how Im "inciting division" between races of people who aren't "united"
a) the suggestion of "white" tempts the division of wanting versus not wanting the suggested "white".
b) united; from unity (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness"...not suggested togetherness (collectivism) like for example under suggested umbrellas such as "white" and "black".
c) race (Latin radix) - "radius; radiate" implies ones radiation outwards into all aka propagation of oneself aka temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
They fucking hate you.
Hate vs Love represents the rebranding of want vs not want (reasoning); caused by consenting to suggestion (black & white); while ignoring need (perceived differentiation as inspiration for adaptation).
They don't want to "unite" with you.
a) they don't need to unite (being one); since each "one" of them represents unity.
b) not want (white) represents reasoning against want (black); caused by consenting to suggested black & white.
they want to take what you have
The choice of want (temptation to ignore need) tempts one to want more. What one ignores represents the need to sustain oneself within the offer of everything perceivable. Having implies want of claiming; which ignores need of reacting to being enacted upon.
I adapt to perceived inspiration; which in return grows my comprehension of the perceived. Others choose to view the world through the lens of a want vs not want conflict (black vs white); while I choose need (perceived) over want (suggested).
this shit
Everything perceivable has a purpose; judging suggested information as "this shit" tempts one to ignore the perceived purpose.
Why not ask yourself why you use "unite" when talking about togetherness; while the parasitic few use it (united nations; european union etc.) under the umbrella of a "one" world government to not bring people together (replacement migration); but to ferment endless division among them?
Weird how literally every comment you've made has tried to incite racial division, then you make this post.
Crying out in pain while striking much?
a) the suggestion of "white" tempts the division of wanting versus not wanting the suggested "white".
b) united; from unity (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness"...not suggested togetherness (collectivism) like for example under suggested umbrellas such as "white" and "black".
c) race (Latin radix) - "radius; radiate" implies ones radiation outwards into all aka propagation of oneself aka temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
Hate vs Love represents the rebranding of want vs not want (reasoning); caused by consenting to suggestion (black & white); while ignoring need (perceived differentiation as inspiration for adaptation).
a) they don't need to unite (being one); since each "one" of them represents unity.
b) not want (white) represents reasoning against want (black); caused by consenting to suggested black & white.
The choice of want (temptation to ignore need) tempts one to want more. What one ignores represents the need to sustain oneself within the offer of everything perceivable. Having implies want of claiming; which ignores need of reacting to being enacted upon.
I adapt to perceived inspiration; which in return grows my comprehension of the perceived. Others choose to view the world through the lens of a want vs not want conflict (black vs white); while I choose need (perceived) over want (suggested).
Everything perceivable has a purpose; judging suggested information as "this shit" tempts one to ignore the perceived purpose.
Why not ask yourself why you use "unite" when talking about togetherness; while the parasitic few use it (united nations; european union etc.) under the umbrella of a "one" world government to not bring people together (replacement migration); but to ferment endless division among them?
I rest my case, your honor.