how Im "inciting division" between races of people who aren't "united"
a) the suggestion of "white" tempts the division of wanting versus not wanting the suggested "white".
b) united; from unity (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness"...not suggested togetherness (collectivism) like for example under suggested umbrellas such as "white" and "black".
c) race (Latin radix) - "radius; radiate" implies ones radiation outwards into all aka propagation of oneself aka temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
They fucking hate you.
Hate vs Love represents the rebranding of want vs not want (reasoning); caused by consenting to suggestion (black & white); while ignoring need (perceived differentiation as inspiration for adaptation).
They don't want to "unite" with you.
a) they don't need to unite (being one); since each "one" of them represents unity.
b) not want (white) represents reasoning against want (black); caused by consenting to suggested black & white.
they want to take what you have
The choice of want (temptation to ignore need) tempts one to want more. What one ignores represents the need to sustain oneself within the offer of everything perceivable. Having implies want of claiming; which ignores need of reacting to being enacted upon.
I adapt to perceived inspiration; which in return grows my comprehension of the perceived. Others choose to view the world through the lens of a want vs not want conflict (black vs white); while I choose need (perceived) over want (suggested).
this shit
Everything perceivable has a purpose; judging suggested information as "this shit" tempts one to ignore the perceived purpose.
Why not ask yourself why you use "unite" when talking about togetherness; while the parasitic few use it (united nations; european union etc.) under the umbrella of a "one" world government to not bring people together (replacement migration); but to ferment endless division among them?
There is only one unity that matters, white unity.
a) matter (form) represents segregated immaterial (flow).
b) what you talk about represents suggested collectivism (coming together under one "white" banner against the hordes of "shitskinistan"...that ignores unity (oneness); because instead of sustaining oneself you are tricked to fight others.
c) all these conflicts you think are winnable by fighting others represent reasoning (want vs not want) over a suggestion made by the parasitic few to divide the ignorant many. You're being farmed for ignorance (choice of want over need).
d) segregation isn't about being against others; but for the sustenance of self. If your mind is set on those "shitskins"; then it ignores the propagation of your skin; your blood; your radius (race). You need to struggle to express your origin; while resisting the temptation of whatever others are suggesting. The more you do; the more your own kin will be attracted to your behavior; to the fruits of your labor.
The solution is to get white people to stop thinking they need to be friends with every shitskin mud monkey that jews dredge up and force into their countries.
You're really going to have to try harder, my nocturnoluminescent friend.
a) the suggestion of "white" tempts the division of wanting versus not wanting the suggested "white".
b) united; from unity (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness"...not suggested togetherness (collectivism) like for example under suggested umbrellas such as "white" and "black".
c) race (Latin radix) - "radius; radiate" implies ones radiation outwards into all aka propagation of oneself aka temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
Hate vs Love represents the rebranding of want vs not want (reasoning); caused by consenting to suggestion (black & white); while ignoring need (perceived differentiation as inspiration for adaptation).
a) they don't need to unite (being one); since each "one" of them represents unity.
b) not want (white) represents reasoning against want (black); caused by consenting to suggested black & white.
The choice of want (temptation to ignore need) tempts one to want more. What one ignores represents the need to sustain oneself within the offer of everything perceivable. Having implies want of claiming; which ignores need of reacting to being enacted upon.
I adapt to perceived inspiration; which in return grows my comprehension of the perceived. Others choose to view the world through the lens of a want vs not want conflict (black vs white); while I choose need (perceived) over want (suggested).
Everything perceivable has a purpose; judging suggested information as "this shit" tempts one to ignore the perceived purpose.
Why not ask yourself why you use "unite" when talking about togetherness; while the parasitic few use it (united nations; european union etc.) under the umbrella of a "one" world government to not bring people together (replacement migration); but to ferment endless division among them?
a) matter (form) represents segregated immaterial (flow).
b) what you talk about represents suggested collectivism (coming together under one "white" banner against the hordes of "shitskinistan"...that ignores unity (oneness); because instead of sustaining oneself you are tricked to fight others.
c) all these conflicts you think are winnable by fighting others represent reasoning (want vs not want) over a suggestion made by the parasitic few to divide the ignorant many. You're being farmed for ignorance (choice of want over need).
d) segregation isn't about being against others; but for the sustenance of self. If your mind is set on those "shitskins"; then it ignores the propagation of your skin; your blood; your radius (race). You need to struggle to express your origin; while resisting the temptation of whatever others are suggesting. The more you do; the more your own kin will be attracted to your behavior; to the fruits of your labor.
You:
Also you:
You're really going to have to try harder, my nocturnoluminescent friend.