Where does Space X get funding? Military. NASA. GOV. What about Starlink? Yes there is just enough of a public image.
What about Tesla. Those investors were largely the public? Sure some are.
Have another guess. Gullible people believe in unicorns. Twitter was sinking. It was losing allies and influence. Along comes what? Another narrative. Why?
Oh I don't doubt that SpaceX and Tesla were awarded government contracts or that those companies could be threatened by Musk's attempt to buy Twitter and remove the censorship apparatus in place.
It becomes far more difficult to do so if those companies are multi-nationals. SpaceX is HQ in the US as is Tesla.
Do I detect sarcasm? Why be threatened instead of provide both Intel and revenue under better strategy. It's a tool. It always was a tool. What's the strategy? Or do you believe in boy wonder? Batman.
Absolutely, it's a distraction. Not much has changed. Except. Here's the thing. In those shortages did they want those liberals arming a bunch of riots again? No. It's just got worse in some regards. Better in others. But the same shit another day.
It's also trying to reel them back in. Instead of them being on everything and everywhere else. Let them swear and rant again. See they're back on it again.
It stops banning govs again. It sells more.
Yea there's gonna be shit ahead with those shortages and bills.
What is Twitter, what is social media, why were they designed.
Putting it simply, why does entry into the USA require your social media profiles?
Why is there the push back from the EU and Britain specifically regarding monitoring?
Has that answered it. It is dystopia no matter who has those reigns. It also projects advertising for a bunch corps taking details, and gov further policing them. No matter that policy. Or if supposedly better rules.
Twitter requires phone numbers, you're verified. Or it requires business IP's with verification. There aren't many work around for plebs. These are directly policed by content submitted. Easing some rules simply manages it better. Obviously for profit, demand, and better catchment.
Not if he is another arm of the USA government.
Where does Space X get funding? Military. NASA. GOV. What about Starlink? Yes there is just enough of a public image.
What about Tesla. Those investors were largely the public? Sure some are.
Have another guess. Gullible people believe in unicorns. Twitter was sinking. It was losing allies and influence. Along comes what? Another narrative. Why?
Oh I don't doubt that SpaceX and Tesla were awarded government contracts or that those companies could be threatened by Musk's attempt to buy Twitter and remove the censorship apparatus in place.
It becomes far more difficult to do so if those companies are multi-nationals. SpaceX is HQ in the US as is Tesla.
Do I detect sarcasm? Why be threatened instead of provide both Intel and revenue under better strategy. It's a tool. It always was a tool. What's the strategy? Or do you believe in boy wonder? Batman.
Absolutely right! It's also a distraction from their purposeful inflation and incoming food shortages....but NOOO let's talk about Elon and Shitter
Absolutely, it's a distraction. Not much has changed. Except. Here's the thing. In those shortages did they want those liberals arming a bunch of riots again? No. It's just got worse in some regards. Better in others. But the same shit another day.
It's also trying to reel them back in. Instead of them being on everything and everywhere else. Let them swear and rant again. See they're back on it again.
It stops banning govs again. It sells more.
Yea there's gonna be shit ahead with those shortages and bills.
People need a little hope to get on with the job they are assigned in the plantation.
I am speculating. But it isn't science.
What is Twitter, what is social media, why were they designed.
Putting it simply, why does entry into the USA require your social media profiles?
Why is there the push back from the EU and Britain specifically regarding monitoring?
Has that answered it. It is dystopia no matter who has those reigns. It also projects advertising for a bunch corps taking details, and gov further policing them. No matter that policy. Or if supposedly better rules.
Twitter requires phone numbers, you're verified. Or it requires business IP's with verification. There aren't many work around for plebs. These are directly policed by content submitted. Easing some rules simply manages it better. Obviously for profit, demand, and better catchment.
What is the strategy here? Think.
Jeff Bezos' cock. Just sayin'.