It's the suggested explanations that represent form (in-form-ation) within flow; which are only held together by consent of the many to the suggestions of the few. The wind allegory (blown away) represents the ongoing perceivable inspiration aka the foundation we shape all suggestible information out of; yet it's the exchange thereof among ourselves aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; that corrupts our comprehension of everything perceivable; because now we think in terms of the suggested explanations of others. Their words are upheld within our memory; while we ignore the perceived sound those suggested words where shaped out of.
I don't work in physics or anything even science related
Here's the foundation of "work"...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". You represent half of the internal power (the choice within balance; the resistance within velocity).
Next, PHYS'IC, noun [Gr. from nature; to produce.]...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) you represent the produced; hence to be (produced) out of (nature).
Lastly; SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka to adapt to perceived inspiration; as opposed to scientism aka to consent suggested information.
Does the indoctrination work so well that they explain everything away with formulas and then new formulas to explain discrepancies in the current failed model?
"in the current" represents the ongoing flow; you represent the temporary form within. The suggested models aim to keep the wool over your eyes; to keep you ignorant of the need of the temporary to resist the velocity of the ongoing for self sustenance.
The "discrepancies" aka discredit (want of credit; creed; faith aka suggested information over perceived inspiration) represents your growth of resistance to the suggested temptation by others. You were farmed up to the point where the suggested food doesn't distract you enough anymore; which tempts you to now want different food. Yet that's just you; while all the others around you have different stages of comprehension; corrupted by different layers of suggested information.
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents credit to creditor; while discredit represents the consequence of ignoring perceived value (liquidity).
Even if there are 150 formulas to get lost and confused in...
The suggested information we stack within out memory; when consenting to it, represents the allegory of the Tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder".
what about the simple observations we can't ignore?
a) perceived inspiration represent the simple observation of a moving system.
b) being the response to perceivable implies the choice of both need (adaptation) and want (ignorance of need). Each one represents the choice at the center of perceived balance (need/want); who needs to resist the temptation of suggested imbalance (want vs not want). All of this is derived from being form within flow; from being the resistance to velocity; from being the reaction to an enacting system etc.
In short...ONEs free will of choice allows the ignorance of ALL perceived (inspiration) for what other ONEs are suggesting (information). The struggle of self sustenance requires resisting want (suggested) for need (perceived).
HOW DOES NO ONE IN PHYSICS OR ASTRONOMY ASK THESE QUESTIONS
The status quo for those who choose want (suggested) over need (perceived) represents following orders (towards death); instead of being the resistance to the natural order (for the sustenance of life). The allegory for this represents the "path of least resistance".
I present these questions and more, on multiple occasions, and almost everyone will come out to viciously defend the accepted bullshit model
a) Present aka PRE (before) ESSE (to be) implies to be (form) out of (flow). You don't present; you express.
b) what others are defending represents the suggested information they chose to "want"; which you contradict as "not want" when suggesting them different information. Both of you are being tricked to reason (want vs not want) against each other about suggested information; while ignoring to adapt (need) to perceived inspiration.
c) as choice one exists at the center of perceived balance (need/want). Viewing the world as a conflict is caused by choosing want (suggested) over need (perceived); which causes want vs not want (conflict of reason). Both of you are fighting over the suggested meaning (information); while ignoring the perceived meaning (inspiration).
d) true vs false; right vs wrong; good vs evil etc. represents a rebranding of want vs not want. You are tricked to switch sides within the same conflict; whenever seeing through a deception on your side, and if you lose enough of your side; you're tempted to hold onto the remaining even harder; hence attacking anyone trying to contradict your worldview; your faith; your belief; your truth; your side against the world.
they consider us animals
We represent AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] + HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] aka form animated by flow. You are being deceived by suggested words (animal; human) to devalue one side (animal) underneath the other (human); while ignoring the perceived status quo of an animal (animated) human (form).
It's the suggested explanations that represent form (in-form-ation) within flow; which are only held together by consent of the many to the suggestions of the few. The wind allegory (blown away) represents the ongoing perceivable inspiration aka the foundation we shape all suggestible information out of; yet it's the exchange thereof among ourselves aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; that corrupts our comprehension of everything perceivable; because now we think in terms of the suggested explanations of others. Their words are upheld within our memory; while we ignore the perceived sound those suggested words where shaped out of.
Here's the foundation of "work"...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". You represent half of the internal power (the choice within balance; the resistance within velocity).
Next, PHYS'IC, noun [Gr. from nature; to produce.]...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) you represent the produced; hence to be (produced) out of (nature).
Lastly; SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka to adapt to perceived inspiration; as opposed to scientism aka to consent suggested information.
"in the current" represents the ongoing flow; you represent the temporary form within. The suggested models aim to keep the wool over your eyes; to keep you ignorant of the need of the temporary to resist the velocity of the ongoing for self sustenance.
The "discrepancies" aka discredit (want of credit; creed; faith aka suggested information over perceived inspiration) represents your growth of resistance to the suggested temptation by others. You were farmed up to the point where the suggested food doesn't distract you enough anymore; which tempts you to now want different food. Yet that's just you; while all the others around you have different stages of comprehension; corrupted by different layers of suggested information.
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents credit to creditor; while discredit represents the consequence of ignoring perceived value (liquidity).
The suggested information we stack within out memory; when consenting to it, represents the allegory of the Tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder".
a) perceived inspiration represent the simple observation of a moving system.
b) being the response to perceivable implies the choice of both need (adaptation) and want (ignorance of need). Each one represents the choice at the center of perceived balance (need/want); who needs to resist the temptation of suggested imbalance (want vs not want). All of this is derived from being form within flow; from being the resistance to velocity; from being the reaction to an enacting system etc.
In short...ONEs free will of choice allows the ignorance of ALL perceived (inspiration) for what other ONEs are suggesting (information). The struggle of self sustenance requires resisting want (suggested) for need (perceived).
The status quo for those who choose want (suggested) over need (perceived) represents following orders (towards death); instead of being the resistance to the natural order (for the sustenance of life). The allegory for this represents the "path of least resistance".
a) Present aka PRE (before) ESSE (to be) implies to be (form) out of (flow). You don't present; you express.
b) what others are defending represents the suggested information they chose to "want"; which you contradict as "not want" when suggesting them different information. Both of you are being tricked to reason (want vs not want) against each other about suggested information; while ignoring to adapt (need) to perceived inspiration.
c) as choice one exists at the center of perceived balance (need/want). Viewing the world as a conflict is caused by choosing want (suggested) over need (perceived); which causes want vs not want (conflict of reason). Both of you are fighting over the suggested meaning (information); while ignoring the perceived meaning (inspiration).
d) true vs false; right vs wrong; good vs evil etc. represents a rebranding of want vs not want. You are tricked to switch sides within the same conflict; whenever seeing through a deception on your side, and if you lose enough of your side; you're tempted to hold onto the remaining even harder; hence attacking anyone trying to contradict your worldview; your faith; your belief; your truth; your side against the world.
We represent AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] + HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] aka form animated by flow. You are being deceived by suggested words (animal; human) to devalue one side (animal) underneath the other (human); while ignoring the perceived status quo of an animal (animated) human (form).