Need represents perceived; want represents suggested. That being said...creationism represents suggested; transmutation represents perceived.
Try to "create" a thought without shaping it out of everything perceivable already in existence? As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) represents forms (ingredient) transmutation out of flow (base).
Creation (out of nothing) was suggested to the many by the few as to deceive them to ignore perceived transmutation (out of everything).
From your perspective? Nope. In regard to BOT; ROBOT (Latin robur) - "strength". Yep. Now if I say the same stuff I wrote before to you face to face...would you then allow yourself to question what was said instead of who's saying it?
How can one create something; when one shapes it out of everything that was already there? It's like I give you a box of LEGO and you go "I created a car". That ain't creation (created out of nothing); that's transmutation (shaped out of everything). If one ignores perceived transmutation for suggested creation; then one also ignores ones free will of choice as the one shaping within all. That's the trick to deceive others to ignore their own potential; while farming them for their ignorance.
a) LA'BOR, noun [Latin labor from labo, to fail.] - "exertion of muscular strength". There's the robur/robota connection to strength.
b) being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents being temporary force of resistance within ongoing force of velocity, hence forced (enacted flow) labor (reacting form)
c) you got any old czech (balto-slavic?) dictionary to share? Since growing my comprehension about the suggested word being shaped out of the perceived sound; I get more and more about how the parasitic few shaped the different languages for the ignorant many. Any old dictionaries are welcome if you like to share.
Aka entertainment (enter tame mind) suggested "in nomine" (in the name of) an idol (Karel Čapek) by the few towards the consenting many.
1920
Just the right part of suggested his-story to enter and tame the minds of the many living in ignorance of their own stories as ONEs within ALL.
Universal
From U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness"; yet how much could that one comprehend of the perceived world if he consents to entertainment by the few who control the distribution infrastructure for the suggested narrative called his-story; who utilize idols such as Karel Čapek to write fiction about yet others (Rossum), just to suggest the consenting consumers down the chain of command what "robot" means?
universal robot
Aka allegory for ones strength; which one ignores when consenting to other ones suggestions, because growing strength requires adaptation to perceived; while resisting the temptation of suggested.
‘Rossum's Universal Robots’
What's the implied message? Suggested technology for dehumanization of perceived humanity. The sleight of hand for those with eyes to see represents the umbrella used to propagate this... "science fiction" aka SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka perceived inspiration and FIC'TION, noun [Latin fictio, from fingo, to feign.] aka suggested information. Science Fiction represents a deliberate contradict in terms.
From your perspective: "I am, whatever you say I am"; because "If I wasn't, then why would I say I am?".
From my perspective: "The Way I Am" aka form (life) as the expression of the "way" of flow (inception towards death).
junionthepipeline
According to your comment history it's been five days since you last posted more than a one sentence response. Could it be that criticizing the efforts of others is based on your lack of comprehending EF'FORT, noun [Latin fortis - "force"]?
But that means jobs and opportunities and the left would prefer you starve and be poor.
Need represents perceived; want represents suggested. That being said...creationism represents suggested; transmutation represents perceived.
Try to "create" a thought without shaping it out of everything perceivable already in existence? As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) represents forms (ingredient) transmutation out of flow (base).
Creation (out of nothing) was suggested to the many by the few as to deceive them to ignore perceived transmutation (out of everything).
From your perspective? Nope. In regard to BOT; ROBOT (Latin robur) - "strength". Yep. Now if I say the same stuff I wrote before to you face to face...would you then allow yourself to question what was said instead of who's saying it?
How can one create something; when one shapes it out of everything that was already there? It's like I give you a box of LEGO and you go "I created a car". That ain't creation (created out of nothing); that's transmutation (shaped out of everything). If one ignores perceived transmutation for suggested creation; then one also ignores ones free will of choice as the one shaping within all. That's the trick to deceive others to ignore their own potential; while farming them for their ignorance.
The word robot actually comes from the Czech language. Robota means "forced labor."
a) LA'BOR, noun [Latin labor from labo, to fail.] - "exertion of muscular strength". There's the robur/robota connection to strength.
b) being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents being temporary force of resistance within ongoing force of velocity, hence forced (enacted flow) labor (reacting form)
c) you got any old czech (balto-slavic?) dictionary to share? Since growing my comprehension about the suggested word being shaped out of the perceived sound; I get more and more about how the parasitic few shaped the different languages for the ignorant many. Any old dictionaries are welcome if you like to share.
The term was coined in K. Čapek's play R.U.R. ‘Rossum's Universal Robots’ (1920).
Aka entertainment (enter tame mind) suggested "in nomine" (in the name of) an idol (Karel Čapek) by the few towards the consenting many.
Just the right part of suggested his-story to enter and tame the minds of the many living in ignorance of their own stories as ONEs within ALL.
From U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness"; yet how much could that one comprehend of the perceived world if he consents to entertainment by the few who control the distribution infrastructure for the suggested narrative called his-story; who utilize idols such as Karel Čapek to write fiction about yet others (Rossum), just to suggest the consenting consumers down the chain of command what "robot" means?
Aka allegory for ones strength; which one ignores when consenting to other ones suggestions, because growing strength requires adaptation to perceived; while resisting the temptation of suggested.
What's the implied message? Suggested technology for dehumanization of perceived humanity. The sleight of hand for those with eyes to see represents the umbrella used to propagate this... "science fiction" aka SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka perceived inspiration and FIC'TION, noun [Latin fictio, from fingo, to feign.] aka suggested information. Science Fiction represents a deliberate contradict in terms.
Your a bot
From your perspective: "I am, whatever you say I am"; because "If I wasn't, then why would I say I am?".
From my perspective: "The Way I Am" aka form (life) as the expression of the "way" of flow (inception towards death).
According to your comment history it's been five days since you last posted more than a one sentence response. Could it be that criticizing the efforts of others is based on your lack of comprehending EF'FORT, noun [Latin fortis - "force"]?