Every time I see some normie saying something like this, I think about the titanically messed up logic behind it.
It's been estimated that in WW2, there were 100,000 small arms rounds fired per enemy casualty. That's a 0.001% "adverse event" rate. So you see, folks, bullets are both safe and INeffective. Do you have some kind of "gunfire hesitancy" problem?
Every time I see some normie saying something like this, I think about the titanically messed up logic behind it.
It's been estimated that in WW2, there were 100,000 small arms rounds fired per enemy casualty. That's a 0.001% "adverse event" rate. So you see, folks, bullets are both safe and INeffective. Do you have some kind of "gunfire hesitancy" problem?