I've had the displeasure of working with members of the "entertainment industry" and it's pretty shocking when you realize how colossally stupid the heads on TV and in film are. Like really, they are incredibly stupid.
When you really think about it, these people have made careers of either pretending to be other people, reading teleprompters, singing, and telling jokes. On their resume I think their top skills would be;
memorization
creative thinking
reading from a distance
a charming smile
team player
So in summary, the people with the loudest voices in traditional and social media have the same skill set as a kid at McDonalds. Yet for some reason, they are the wealthiest and most influential members of our society.
For example do you think Jussie Smollett came up with a plan to stage his own lynching on his own or did someone higher up and more sinister tell him to do it which explains why he seemed to be very worried about being suicided in jail?
If anything it makes these people even more loathsome because I have to believe that a lot of them aren't that stupid but they really have no qualms about just parroting the lines their masters feed them even if they know its bullshit.
Consider..."enter-tame-mind" and STUPID, adjective - "wanting in understanding" in regards to choice (suggested information) towards choice (consent to suggested information) contract law; which ignores balance (offered perception) to choice (responding growth of comprehension)?
memorization
The memory (mind) needs to be used like a ram (adaptation to ongoing perceived inspiration); yet is tempted to be misused like a hard-drive (accumulation of suggested information). Enter-tame-mind represents feeding suggested information towards consenting minds.
creative thinking
Suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) ignores perceived transmutation (implies out of everything). As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); transmutation implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka forms transmutation out of base flow.
Those with creative thinking are remembering (respond to memory) suggested information (fiction); while ignoring to shape out of perceived inspiration (reality).
reading from a distance
Following the suggested narrative.
a charming smile
Perpetuating the suggested narrative with sales-pitches for the choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law.
team player
Suggested unity (togetherness) in ignorance of perceived unitas - "the state of being one; oneness"
for some reason
Reason represents the want versus not want conflict; caused by consenting to want or not want any suggested information (want); while ignoring perceived inspiration (need). The parasitic few utilize suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many; which is how they control both sides of every conflict in this system.
Choice represents the response to perceived balance (need/want); yet is tempted to ignore this for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) by the suggesting choices of others.
I've had the displeasure of working with members of the "entertainment industry" and it's pretty shocking when you realize how colossally stupid the heads on TV and in film are. Like really, they are incredibly stupid.
When you really think about it, these people have made careers of either pretending to be other people, reading teleprompters, singing, and telling jokes. On their resume I think their top skills would be;
So in summary, the people with the loudest voices in traditional and social media have the same skill set as a kid at McDonalds. Yet for some reason, they are the wealthiest and most influential members of our society.
Hunger Games was a warning.
I think it goes beyond that.
For example do you think Jussie Smollett came up with a plan to stage his own lynching on his own or did someone higher up and more sinister tell him to do it which explains why he seemed to be very worried about being suicided in jail?
If anything it makes these people even more loathsome because I have to believe that a lot of them aren't that stupid but they really have no qualms about just parroting the lines their masters feed them even if they know its bullshit.
Some of the schemes these people come up with are so hilariously stupid, it’s like they are lifting ideas from a Scooby Doo cartoon.
Smollett probably convinced himself his plan was so cunning, nobody could figure it out. Pee-pee Gate was another example.
Fortunatoey for us, the cunning plans are so terrible, they are pretty easy to spot.
Consider..."enter-tame-mind" and STUPID, adjective - "wanting in understanding" in regards to choice (suggested information) towards choice (consent to suggested information) contract law; which ignores balance (offered perception) to choice (responding growth of comprehension)?
The memory (mind) needs to be used like a ram (adaptation to ongoing perceived inspiration); yet is tempted to be misused like a hard-drive (accumulation of suggested information). Enter-tame-mind represents feeding suggested information towards consenting minds.
Suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) ignores perceived transmutation (implies out of everything). As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); transmutation implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka forms transmutation out of base flow.
Those with creative thinking are remembering (respond to memory) suggested information (fiction); while ignoring to shape out of perceived inspiration (reality).
Following the suggested narrative.
Perpetuating the suggested narrative with sales-pitches for the choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law.
Suggested unity (togetherness) in ignorance of perceived unitas - "the state of being one; oneness"
Reason represents the want versus not want conflict; caused by consenting to want or not want any suggested information (want); while ignoring perceived inspiration (need). The parasitic few utilize suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many; which is how they control both sides of every conflict in this system.
Choice represents the response to perceived balance (need/want); yet is tempted to ignore this for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) by the suggesting choices of others.