I know many want to think he is "one of us" truth seekers and simply "get's it wrong" sometimes. But he is getting it wrong so often that he is either an irresponsible journalist or an outright disinfo agent by design . I have 3 notable examples from the past year.

1. Stew Peters brought on Dr. Ariyana Love who either doesn't know how to read, or is a disinfo agent.

She claims Ebola and Marburg virus are in the COVID J&J vaccines AND that the vaccines modify specific human genes producing effectively AIDS.

I read over the patents she is referring. They are vaccines for Ebola and Marburg. That is why they contain their proteins. Wouldn't that be obvious to a doctor? https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140017278A1/en

administering to the subject, as a priming vaccination, an immunologically effective amount of a recombinant adenovirus vector comprising a polynucleotide encoding a filovirus antigenic protein

The filovirus protein refers to either Ebola OR Marburg which are both filoviruses. That is how the technology works and somehow this doctor doesn't know. This disinfo agent is building up a strawman of "evidence" for the establishment to take down.

In regards to gene deletion, whether it happens or or not there is no evidence in the patent as she claims. The patent is saying the VIRUS has certain genes deleted.

In some embodiments, the adenovirus is replication deficient, e.g., because it contains a deletion in the E1 region of the genome

For E2- and/or E4-mutated adenoviruses, generally E2- and/or E4-complementing cell lines are used to generate recombinant adenoviruses.

How could anyone miss that?? It says it is the virus' E1 genes not humans as Dr. Love claims. I'm not saying these can't modify DNA, but I am saying her claim is based on at best a misreading of the patent and at worst deliberate disinfo to poison the well of truth.

2. "Former" Pfizer rep, Karen Kingston, claims she has proof in a paper that the covid vaccines contain graphene.

She claims a paper she found from a Chinese company who provides PEG for Moderna vaccines proves there is graphene oxide is in their product and by extension the vaccine.

I looked at the exact research paper and website she cites on the Stew Peters show (Stew could have read it also) and the paper merely refers to research of graphene technology mixed with their product, but does not claim their product always contains graphene. In fact their website shows they create a wide range of variations of PEG which can be used as "excipients", not tying any single one product to any particular vaccine.

So again we see someone muddying the waters with bad information and the only plausible explanation is that it is deliberate. This doesn't mean there is no graphene in the shots, but it does mean this "former" Pfizer employee is poisoning the well.

"CORE-SHELL STRUCTURED POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL FUNCTIONALISED GRAPHENE OXIDE FOR ENERGY STORAGE POLYMER DIELECTRICS" is the paper Karen Kingston cites https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0266353819336371 https://www.sinopeg.com/excipients-for-mrna-delivery-system_c138

3. Claiming Patrick King won a court case which he clearly didn't.

Stew Peters brought Patrick King onto his show claiming in the very headline of the show that King won a lawsuit which he did not. He lost the suit. They also falsely claim the court admitted that no evidence of SARS-Cov-2 virus exists, when they said no such thing. So is Stew Peters a liar / disinfo agent here or just astonishingly incompetent.

Patrick King even admitted on Press for Truth & Rebel News later that he didn't win and he blames Stew for saying otherwise. Look up https://odysee.com/@PressForTruth:4/Pat-King-Interview:6 on Odysee.

4. So now Stew Peters is the one "breaking" the snake venom story with Dr Bryan "leaps of logic" Ardis and doing so once again fully credulously without a hint of skepticism. Keep in mind Stew's history when studying this story. It is likely truth mixed with lies and bad pieces of evidence for the narrative checkers to "debunk".