Nothing he has specifically said makes me not trust him (though he often makes mistakes and leaps of logic) but just his "vibe". Something about how he carries himself just doesn't feel like an authentic truth teller, putting his life on the line. I don't know, is it just me?
Comments (23)
sorted by:
He doesn't ask the questions he should and instead schedules nonstop speaking tours with alt media and controlled op
One thing I'd think he'd want to do if he truly thinks there is "snake venom" would be to obtain vials of vaccine and remdesivir (shouldn't be too hard for a doctor with his connections) and test them using some protein identification techniques.
It would be a pretty routine process to check a protein's amino acid sequence against those of known toxins (including snake venom) to see what is there if anything.
He and Mike Adams are both trying to get a sample of it. A new Q&A session was just released. They take about the “watch the water” stuff, which he admits he could be wrong about it and that he is hoping that people with the right skill sets (scientists, etc) will take this info and dig for themselves. They also discuss trying to get a sample of the drug to test. I think it’s prudent we all do our own research on what he suggests. We all know something is fishy about c19. I don’t think we should outright discredit anyone without doing our own research into it. I have started my own. I do think his interview with Mike Adams was perhaps his best. Due to the fact that he presented news articles and scientific research papers. He seems to be someone who is on the spectrum, but I’m not a doctor. This could explain his “excitement” over his findings. I know when I connect dots, even horrible ones, I get excited to share the info and help people.
Yeah. Though it could also be they bring out crazy people (like Alex Jones) who will actually say truth in such a way that people won't believe it.
I think it is at least worth it for researchers to analyze remdesivir vials and falsify what Ardis says. Though Ardis should be calling for that himself if he was legit.
I don't think it's a secret that snake venom is being used to develop modern medicines. Off the top of my head, the anti coagulation effects seen in some venom would have medicinal value in treating clots and other afflictions.
With that said, I don't know if any of the covid treatments were developed using snake venom. Nor would that be considered a conspiracy to me, for the reasons I stated above.
But I've seen, in just this past week, everything from they're putting a snake venom derivitave in the water to give people covid to they're putting snake venom in the vaccines.
Why this fucking chiropractor masquerading as a medical doctor needs a fucking press tour about it tells me it's exactly what it looks like: another grift.
The dumber the bullshit the faster it goes viral, lol.
From the makers of Two More Weeks, The Kraken, A German Server Just Flew Over My House, Military Tribunals, Sealed Indictments, and The Red Deer, comes the latest sensation sweeping boomer facebook feeds for the last 72 hours: SNAKE VENOM WATER VAX BUT ALSO MEDICINE AND THE VIRUS ITSELF!
Yeah "doctor" back cracker will be touring with Marjorie Taylor Greene and the crackhead pillow salesman with special guest, everyone's favorite batshit crazy aunt, Sidney Powell in about two more weeks...
Earlier today when I was listening to his latest Brighteon episode I had the thought, 'what if this guy just stumbled into that Arizona University study pertaining COVID-19 and similarities to rattlesnake bites and then decided to jump on it while it was hot.' I swear, IIRC, that Arizona university story popped up in our circles just days before his interviews came out. It's possible it was the other way around (that the interviews dropped beforehand and caused the Arizona news to heat up), but i'm fairly sure it wasn't. So, imagine if, instead of "1000 hours over the past four months", he literally just pulled up a bunch of info and came up with this narrative over the weekend...
Either way, a lot of the stuff that he is saying is very plausible, and if he hadn't added his speculation about the water source being tainted, I think most of everything he said would have been provable (based on the studies he cites, etc.). I don't think, like Cliff High does, that the theory about the water source is automatically bullshit, but I also don't necessarily think that part is founded in anything real; just speculation based on the water testing.
However, to add to his speculation, it is worth noting that the big news narrative surrounding the lead tainted water in Michigan a few years ago was well timed, if the goal was to create a demand for federal involvement in local water treatment facilities. Anytime national news gives some kind of local story, which primarily impacts poor people, you know that trickery is afoot.
Put no weight into the opinions of the crowd. Better way to live (by your gut). My gut tells me the same thing about him, and then looking at his weak arguments (and fantastic leaps in logic) only confirms he is unreliable.
It has been "fact checked"...
Might be truer than it seems.
There may be a grain of truth to it, but Ardis is disinfo. They always put truth mixed with lies. But no way Ardis could be so naive to make some of the downright stupid arguments he makes, such as "the pope's venom". That is beyond dumb.
And he flat out assumes what that dead researcher Bing Liu was working on before he died. He provides 0 evidence Bing was looking into snake venom.
sure, I wouldn't go out to buy his fucking supplements, but still, I guide myself with ancient knowledge and all the ancients always raved about the snake people and their tricks
hindus used to say the craziest shit about snakes that used light emitting jewels and had an artificial sun and lived inside the earth
shit perhaps is about to sound less crazy in a few years
India is also full of liars who make things up. I wouldn't trust any story from them without solid evidence behind it. Hinduism is full of idolatry as well.
I trust but verify. Until I can discredit what he says, I won’t say a word against him. I think his interview with Mike Adams was his best since it allowed him to show his evidence rather than just speak it. He should stick with this concept. Also check out his Q&A with Mike Adams (just released), it may clear stuff up for some of you. My fiancé is super skeptical (more than me and Im pretty jaded) and even he is intrigued. I think the water and religious aspects are clouding his message as these are things people distrust. If your intuition says somethings off here then follow it and disprove him. We are supposed to be people who uncover the truth. Nothing wrong with questioning his theory, just don’t be so hasty to dismiss it. A lot of people have dismissed theories over the years without research and have been wrong.
He blames the Catholic church, all based on word play. It's a retarded take, which also diverts away from the other group more responsible that gave us the CEOs of Pfizer and Moderna, as well as the head of the CDC.
Get this trust idea out of your mind; it is snake venom to your thought process.
Personally, I think he is connecting dots that aren't there.
But consider, do you think anyone would deliberately create a biological weapon that, when activated, causes the body to produce an autotoxin?
evidence that there was an enzyme, a snake-like enzyme, in the blood of people
And that is interesting, but then let's also find that in Remdesivir vials and vaccinated people.
Me neither. Explodes in popularity overnight, makes bold leap of logic regarding delivery mechanism (testing waste water is not even close to tainting the water everywhere in the world at the same time), and then goes on a wild rant about the Catholic church being behind it all. Fuck this guy.