I have a sneaking suspicion that the real pandemic on the human species has already begun. It is not a 'virus' or bacteria that is going to kill us .... It's a mind virus of ideas.
--
For 10 years we have been infected as a species....we are now hosts to these ideas ....
--
These ideas are like a blight on our society....they will cause us to shutdown our proper facilities and functions ... Our societal organs.....
We will start to self immolate ourselves.......we will demand changes harder and faster.....these are the side effects ... Only those who are spared by the mind virus and its side effects will be free to continue....the rest will slowly spin like water circling the drain....
I put it back to about 1917, and the Russian Revolution spreading the errors of communism throughout the world. Previous incidents of mass psychosis, like the French Revolution, work themselves out in short order as reality hits.
Yes, you are going to see it.
It happened in the Dark Ages, it happened for most of the 20th century.
Once this ideology pandemic is over, assuming you are still alive, you will be broken to the point you are no better than the elites.
AKA you will only desire revenge and death until you kill yourself.
Mind represents memory; a virus implies a vector (to carry). For suggested information to enter memory; consent is required.
IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see.] That implies perceived (inspiration)...not suggested (information). All suggestions represent a choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which gives those suggesting the contract; the power over those consenting to it.
In other words...the many see (perceived); the few slap a label on it (suggested), and if the many consent; than the suggested label defines their understanding of what they see.
A sleight of hand for this goes "Fear is the mind killer" (from Dune). Why? Because fear implies a suggested outcome; for which one ignores to adapt to perceived origin aka ignoring that which is (reality) for that which others suggest will be (fiction).
As form (life) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death); one represents "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance (aka free-dom). To use your words...continuation (flow) causes free will (choice) for those within (form).
Form choosing to go with the flow (towards death); instead of responding as the resistance (for the sustenance of life) represents the "circling the drain" allegory; yet it ain't slower; it's faster since ignorance reduces life's resistance.
Consent to suggested information (want) represents the choice to ignore perceived inspiration (need), yet the parasitic few are constantly suggesting "choices" to deceive the many to misuse their choice upon the suggested choices; instead of as the response-ability within perceived balance.
The NPC behavior; the following of orders; the mainstream narrative lemmings; those who march lockstep with the party-line are ignoring their temporary existence as the resisting form (life) within the ongoing natural order of flow (inception towards death). Instead of resisting the perceived natural order (need); they are choosing to follow the suggested orders of others (want). The consequences thereof represent the inspiration for you to resist the temptation to ignore perceived (need) for suggested (want); yet it's only your free will of choice making that choice.
No, you only need to see it / hear it / touch it for it to enter memory. In some cases, you can imagine it.
Seeing; hearing; touching implies sensing perceived inspiration. Suggested information implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while ignoring perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
The memory (mind) "needs" to be used like a ram (adaptation to ongoing inspiration); yet is tempted to "want" to be misused like a hard-drive (accumulation of suggested information until capacity).
The temporary perceiving memory exists within the ongoing perceivable inspiration aka as form within flow aka as choice within balance. It's the choices of all others that tempt with suggested information to ignore the perceived inspiration. To consent to suggested information then allows it to enter memory as an affixed set of orders; which corrupts the growth of comprehension out of the perceived natural order.
IMAGE (perceived) through -ATION (action aka motion) towards reaction (formed choice); yet choice implies both need (perceived inspiration) and want (suggested information). Others suggest you for example captured moments (pictures) aka captured momentum (balance) or motion pictures (the movement of captured momentum) aka the suggested imbalance (want vs not want) over the perceived balance (need/want).
In short...the picture perceived represents ongoing momentum; the pictures suggested represents captured moments in ignorance of ongoing momentum. As an example...you next to your child. If you remember (respond to memory) the child's birth; then you ignore the child while remembering aka ignorance of that which is for that which was.
Do you really think the bloated attempt to state something has any value? In your first attempt to overly complicate a process you do not seem to understand, you can see clearly that you are incorrect.
For example, once you see the grass bend you cannot unsee it.
The highest value in all existence represents each ones evaluation thereof. I cannot state value; I represent the evaluating state (choice) within the state of value (balance).
To be implies out of; hence being processed through motion aka formed (life) by flow (inception towards death).
a) understanding represents standing under the suggested information by others; while ignoring to comprehend perceived inspiration.
b) "do not" aka doing nothing represents a suggestion for which one ignores the perceived "being done by everything". Ask yourself about the origin of no; not; nothing; nothingness...can one thing within every thing perceive no thing?
a) seeing implies perceiving inspiration through senses; which isn't clear since each one perceiving it lacking comprehension about what it means.
b) incorrect implies versus correct aka a conflict of reason aka a rebranding of want vs not want (imbalance); while ignoring need/want (balance). Nature doesn't communicate incorrect information; it moves those within for perceivable inspiration to adapt to. Both correct and incorrect suggestions imply the use of choice to shape perceived into suggestible towards others. That's parasitic behavior aiming to undermine the choice of others with the temptation to ignore perceived for suggested.
What you call "grass" represents form responding to flow; which your senses perceive as moving differences aka inspiration within the constantly changing moment (um). Just wait, and the remaining grass becomes frozen; hence restricted in its bending behavior. You chose to put "grass bending" as affixed information into your memory, and are now contradicted by perceivable change.
Furthermore; if one idolizes the suggested meaning of "grass"; then one ignores what choice can shape it into at will, like for example a shelter; a bed; a toilet; a cleaning utensil; food; compost; an ecosystem; growth potential; the fruits of ones labor; a hobby; an instrument; decoration; medicine and so on. You need to adapt to whatever perceived within momentum; not to suggested meanings you attach to the idol "grass".
As for unseeing...memory is being temporarily shaped and frequency of choice can grow or reduce whatever one chooses to put in it. All perceivable inspiration is always available to each one perceiving it within; yet upheld suggested information corrupts comprehension of perceived for suggested definitions by others. Those within perceivable cannot define it...only themselves in it by growing comprehension of it. Comprehension implies compressed into one (form) by the impressing all (flow).
I want to assure you I did not bother to read this drivel and I am certain noone else will either. You should refocus your efforts.
How could choice within balance be CERTAIN, adjective - "undoubted; unquestionable; that cannot be denied" when there's the choice to doubt; question and deny?
a) I respond to perceived inspiration to grow comprehension thereof...not for others; but for the sustenance of self. How others respond represents their free will of choice.
b) again with the "no" (noone)...why do you put "nothing" in front of one-thing?
My efforts as resisting form represents the response to the velocity of flow aka the source of heat. In other words...suggestion tempts to focus on outcomes; while perceived inspires to adapt to origin.
But if all is form with flow...so too are ideas. And those ideas have their own form and flow. And so as being a part of THE (form and flow that is) - then naturally must subserve the greater it....and so too can it consent to the new form and flow of the encaptured process (having been infected by the sub-form and flow ideas)
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) all perceivable represents form; which when adapted to, allows the growth of comprehension about flow.
IDE'A, noun [Latin video] - "to see". That represents perceived inspiration; yet others can suggest information; which tempts one to ignore perceived (need) for suggested (want). Also notice that the parasitic few utilized the term "video" (VHS) for their suggested information, as to instill ideas into you aka enter-tame-mind (entertainment).
All perceivable (idea) represents form responding to the momentum of flow. Movement represents the response to being moved. Life being moved from inception towards death represents one direction; yet as life within the momentum (balance) of that directing flow; the responding choice of directions temporarily becomes available at the center of balance.
Within momentum we have the free will of choice to move around; while being dominated by the motion that moves us towards the predefined outcome (death). So a) form represents the center of flow and b) as the formed response of flow; one cannot own anything; only utilize everything for self sustenance.
Partial (ONEs form) implies within; out of, and in response to whole (ALL flow). Flow (velocity) causing momentum (balance) represent the cause of differentiation into form (resistance).
The balance (momentum of motion) of velocity/resistance aka flow/form aka balance/choice represents EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka the "greater it" aka the ONEness (energy) of ALL (flow/form) for the ONEs (form) within ALL (flow).
Each one is internally processed by energy for both loss (flow) and growth (form) aka choice of need/want. Choice within balance represents free within dominance (free-dom). Formed resistance within flowing velocity represents reactor within generator.
Consent implies by choice; yet choice represents the center of balance aka the center of the "encaptured process". The process itself represents forward motion; while the resulting momentum represents both the dominating capture and the opportunity for temporary free will of choice to exist within.
Consent suggests "to be of one mind"; yet the motion which "sends" differentiates itself into individual recipient minds (memory) aka flow to form. Consent as suggested represents agreement vs disagreement (imbalance); which ignores response-ability of choice (within balance). In short...choice doesn't need to agree or disagree with suggested choices; but needs to respond to perceived balance.
Do you need to consent to breathing or do you need to breathe?