45 Who would be afraid of honest discussion regarding male genital mutilation? (media.conspiracies.win) posted 349 days ago by glownigger8675309 349 days ago by glownigger8675309 +49 / -4 30 comments download share 30 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
There are hospitals that refuse to perform this. It's considered cosmetic.
You sound anti-cosmetic
I've seen the differences because my sister had her kids at a hospital that didn't circumsize, and my kids were born at a hospital that did circumsize.
Everyone goes on about teaching the boys how to take care of themselves, I never see people discuss when the babies are in diapers. Most likely because that makes any problems the result of the adults that are supposed to be taking care of them.
No real health benefit in the modern age unless the foreskin is deformed by a genetic condition and even then the foreskin can be stretched over time to compensate for such.
Eh, I'm all natural... What health benefit do you have with your disfigured cock that I don't have? Lol, you need lotion to jerk your desensitized gerk, I don't :)
One of my nephews had no issue. One of my nephews did have issues. I'm referring to diaper age. They're adults now. I am aware that would make it their adult supervision at, " fault". But, one of my nephews definitely had issues.
you dont mutilate a baby. to each their own your ass you sick fuck.
God willing if I ever have a son, he will NOT be mutilated.
I'd like to sue the hospital that mutilated me.
I got that two-tone cut.
They do with their teeth….
Idk, got it done to me... I'm fine. Never gave it a thought
And we wonder why we have so many issues with sex in our society. It starts at birth.
the more i saw how early the imprinting starts the more i realized such early conditioning could span generations and go unnoticed by the average person.