The problem is getting past the narrative. It's Ironclad. Finds have been reported numerously but then restrictions are imposed and they're further debunked. Or exploration is simply halted by threat of military navy. Where they're erased, and often ruled as natural geology. The ones exposed like Japan, even Incan, the one linked they try to tie into existing archaeology dating. Despite of no record.

Today it's becoming much harder. Because the younger Dryas impact has been quite proved. The impact crater has been found, but that assumption had been there for over a century. It was also known about for decades off the record. But it will take decades to insert into any history, and when it does they simply move the dates back to compensate. Like the neanderthal debate this year on coexistence.

But there are plenty of growing anomalies that are becoming much harder to refute.

India has huge claims and challenges currently with some of the underwater finds and the sanskrit recordings of them. What is the dating of Adam's Bridge and Dwarka. Others https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/9500-year-old-city-found-underwater-off-india-gautam-sen

Or Mayan finds. Now showing ages past 9000 years.

I doubt the record will be set straight. It hasn't. No time soon. Instead they just release another dinosaur to compensate.