A world tour of pyramids.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
There is much older. Far older in fact.
https://historyofyesterday.com/gunung-padang-the-oldest-pyramid-in-the-world-3b965e6e1772?gi=e71ff5874b2f
The above has virtually been proved. There are others that are still being debated.
They also leave out the pyramid in Bosnia, which is supposedly also 20.000+ years old.
Yes, but unproven. Although I am well aware of it and its non natural formation. Plenty more underwater with claims and ages undetermined.
Here is another
https://alien-ufo-sightings.com/2022/03/ancient-submerged-pyramid-was-recently-discovered-in-china-it-was-build-before-the-ice-age/
https://conexaoufo.com/en/submerged-city-found-in-a-lake-of-china/
The problem is they don't fit the narrative of Rome invented Iron, and everything else was clay. No dating before Christ, and he gave education to all the monkeys. Meaning according to the narrative they cannot be older than 5000 years because there was no Iron, when Rome invented it. They have proved everybody came out of Africa, because it has the oldest pyramids, and it has the gorilla, and it's in the middle of the planet.
Underwater archaeology is incredibly interesting! It's high on my list of "things to do if I suddenly had a lot of money" :-) There's almost certainly something to be done by advancing the state of underwater drones a bit, and then automating the bulk of the survey work.
The problem is getting past the narrative. It's Ironclad. Finds have been reported numerously but then restrictions are imposed and they're further debunked. Or exploration is simply halted by threat of military navy. Where they're erased, and often ruled as natural geology. The ones exposed like Japan, even Incan, the one linked they try to tie into existing archaeology dating. Despite of no record.
Today it's becoming much harder. Because the younger Dryas impact has been quite proved. The impact crater has been found, but that assumption had been there for over a century. It was also known about for decades off the record. But it will take decades to insert into any history, and when it does they simply move the dates back to compensate. Like the neanderthal debate this year on coexistence.
But there are plenty of growing anomalies that are becoming much harder to refute.
India has huge claims and challenges currently with some of the underwater finds and the sanskrit recordings of them. What is the dating of Adam's Bridge and Dwarka. Others https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/9500-year-old-city-found-underwater-off-india-gautam-sen
Or Mayan finds. Now showing ages past 9000 years.
I doubt the record will be set straight. It hasn't. No time soon. Instead they just release another dinosaur to compensate.
yes.
its argued that china has pyramids that are even older but the CCP aint gonna have none of that.