Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

32
Yet another false flag. Missile strikes Kramatorsk, kills 30. Zelensky's aid claims it's a russian "Iskander" missile, Zelensky himself calls it a "Tochka-U" missile. Pictures of the missile confirms it as a "Tochka-U", which are NOT USED by the Russian military. (www.aljazeera.com)
posted 3 years ago by allfourth 3 years ago by allfourth +33 / -1
32 comments share
32 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (32)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– allfourth [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

What's left of the missile shows the characteristic grid fins of the Tochka, which Iskander missiles don't have. https://de.catbox.moe/vb8pqa.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K720_Iskander

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTR-21_Tochka

Also, how does a missile that kills 30 people is just sitting there on a perfectly green lawn without visible destruction?

permalink save report block reply
▲ -8 ▼
– ZyklonBen -8 points 3 years ago +3 / -11

Also, how does a missile that kills 30 people is just sitting there on a perfectly green lawn without visible destruction?

It's a missile, not a grenade.

A missile has a warhead and that is what explodes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– NelsC 4 points 3 years ago +5 / -1

The lawn shows about as much damage as if that chunk of metal was just thrown off the back of a truck. It didn't hit that spot at any significant speed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– raven9 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It looks like an old Soviet era SS-21 (tochka-u) that probably had a 9N123K cluster munition warhead. The 9N123K warhead uses a low yeild explosive to airburst at about 2000 meters so the payload of 50 cluster munitions are spread out as they impact over the target area. That would be why the missile body lands nearby, mostly intact.

Having said that even the force of the explosion of a conventional HE warhead could also throw it's missile body away from the impact location so it would land nearby but I think you would probably expect to see more damage to it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -5 ▼
– ZyklonBen -5 points 3 years ago +1 / -6

Ok, Mr Missile Expert. Show me what you were expecting.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– NelsC 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Landscaper's riding lawnmower digs bigger holes in my lawn after a rain has softened the ground. I was hoping, but not expecting, for somebody with experience to explain why there should or should not be a bigger hole.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– ZyklonBen 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Why should there be a hole? The engine of a missile is not the part that explodes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– NelsC 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Why should there be a hole? From impact I would think. The engine doesn't explode, but it should get thrown with some force as it is close to the explosion.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– ZyklonBen 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

I think

So, you opinion is not based on anything rational

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 4 ▼
– KiloRomeo 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Zalensky and Azov have a terrible reputation. When they fail their handlers will hang them out to dry

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Ep0ch 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1

Does anybody know what the train was carrying, has been carrying, outside of a bunch of dumb human shields?

It's in the Donbass. It's supplying arms and moving troops. It's a target.

Now did the Russians hit it. Odds are highly probable. However they're not impossible with what we are seeing from Ukraine. Create a disaster generate opinion. Desperate to use whatever means, it's in their playbook. A playbook they have an advantage, where everybody else is a racist unless you also believe in King Louie. He wants the secrets of fire.

They both have this missile, although it is older tech. But could have easily been supplied to separatists, if not fielded.

I am not buying that it wasn't a target. It's highly probable. They're using way too much cover, and new weapons are quite threatening. In that regard it's not a warcrime, simple causality of being caught in crossfire. Where wolf, I meant bear keeps getting cried.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– raven9 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

We know the Russians did not do it because the missile body is a old Soviet era SS-21 that was decommissioned by the Russian military decades ago but when former Soviet states like Ukraine inherited them when the Soviet Union broke up they kept them in service.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Ep0ch 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

No, we don't. Separatists are also using older equipment, correct? Ukrainian armament caches have been overrun and gained. Decommissioned doesn't mean fully refitted. There could be a depot with older munitions stockpiled rather than recycled.

Russia has a motive. It's an obvious target. Railways transporting military equipment and soldiers. It's on the front line, in the Donbass. Or Donetsk Oblast.

It doesn't mean they did it.

What I have a problem with is the way the bodies were laid out. The missile painted with For the Children. Immediately after the same press was screaming about child causalities. It stinks of fuckery. Also the immediate reaction to it.

Objectively the propaganda has been worse than the war. It's a grim business but the press has been real assholes with that coverage. Unwatchable, undignified, and hysterical. Frankly I don't care. Stop arming monkeys less people get hurt. It really is that simple. But this is beyond moral from an opposing side blowing raspberries and hiding behind a people they don't even give a shit about. It's a geopolitical agenda. To them Russians killing Russians must make them ecstatic. It really is that disgusting. Clap and put him on TV, sing a song. No compass. No perspective. Rather one of those dirty wars.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ZyklonBen -1 points 3 years ago +1 / -2

This is a total lie and just the current Russian narrative that is getting spread by Russian trolls and those simping for Putin.

Russia has hundreds of launchers fielding these missiles in active service.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– raven9 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Not with the serial number that can be clearly seen on the missile wreckage that proves it was in service with the Ukraine military

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– tchouk 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Ukraine has been killing Ukrainians for more than 8 years during their civil war, including thousands of civilians.

Why would anyone be surprised that this is continuing now that the war has grown larger in scope?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Zinnsee 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTR-21_Tochka#/media/File:OTR-21_operators.png

permalink save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– deleted -3 points 3 years ago +1 / -4
▲ -11 ▼
– ZyklonBen -11 points 3 years ago +1 / -12

Russia operates more than 200 Tochka launchers you fucking liar. Why the fuck would Russia not use missiles that are manufactured in Russia?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Smokratez 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Russia is a huge arms dealer. Why are you defending jews again?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ZyklonBen -1 points 3 years ago +2 / -3

Jews? I thought the enemy are Nazis.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Smokratez 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

yeah, ashkenazis are the issues

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Skyrison 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

hey zyklon ben shapiro. you going to almost cry like you did on your show yesterday you weak fuck? go suck off zelensky and set up another donation drive with him lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– tchouk 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Because they're really old and have been displaced by much better newer missiles.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– ZyklonBen -3 points 3 years ago +1 / -4

are you claiming that Russia doesn't use these missiles anymore?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Skyrison 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

i am claiming that ukraine is doing most of this stuff to it's own citizens, then blaming russia, so they can play the whole victim card, while zelensky begs for more weapons so they can launder money.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– ZyklonBen 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Cool story but apart from parroting Russian propaganda, is there anything you can present to substantiate these claims?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Smokratez 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Go to Ukraine, and talk to people. They will confirm.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– tchouk 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

That's what it means when a weapon system is decommissioned and retired, yes.

Like the US doesn't use Nike missiles or F-117 Nighthawk jets any longer because they are retired.

That doesn't mean you don't have them in storage somewhere.

The tochka-u missles are probably not mothballed because Russia gave them away to Syria and Belarus.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– ZyklonBen -2 points 3 years ago +1 / -3

So is that the current Russian narrative that they have given out?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– tchouk 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

No, it's a fact that they've been retired for a number of years now, replaced by newer and better hardware not built in the 80s, 35+ years ago.

It's also a fact that Ukraine has these weapons systems in active service, as does Belarus and a bunch of other post Soviet states.

It's also a fact that the current Ukrainian regime has been killing its own civilian citizens for 8 years, including with these missles.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy