IQ is a bullshit test. It means only towards a standard of teaching apparent with other such education systems. By comparison to their environment how have they adapted. You can presume unintelligent, because it is without educational literacy. In likewise comparisons of perhaps survival, what is intelligence, how has it faired? Hence IQ is a wrongful assumption.
Needless to say there are huge gaps in IQ. An easier assumption is that neither fairs well in contrary environments, not without adopting more than IQ.
Please test it, put Einstein in the jungle, now put a moron from the jungle, back into that jungle. What went wrong. IQ obviously.
The debate gains greater traction of what has shaped since an evolutionary model, how any civilizations have advanced around it. Tired debates based on the assumptions of provided literacy.
No it is a useless assumption. It is often only from a postion of provided literacy based on the evolutionary model.
Where perhaps genes over time breed intelligence, where others breed strength.
IQ doesn't measure much. In contrary environments how does intellect adapt. Only with the tools and resources at hand in a process of interaction taking much longer to develop. Interaction from primarily conflict. Our species only tends to peak in its advancements from fight or flight. Without it techniques have taken far longer to progress. By conflict it has often assumed literacy or dominance.
I am only here to debate. I don't have to prove my IQ. Unlike look at yours. If that was an intelligent response I pity your IQ, it is the equivalent of a nigger's.
IQ doesn't measure much. In contrary environments how does intellect adapt. Only with the tools and resources at hand in a process of interaction taking much longer to develop. Interaction from primarily conflict.
Blacks, despite being in the US and other countries for 5+ generations still significantly have lower iqs than the brown, Asian, and white populations around them. Which means that OPs point still stands. I honestly wish this wasn’t the case. I myself am a minority and it took me a long time to come to terms with this fact.
Do you want me to bring up the education scores in the UK for the last few years. It was a debate held in parliament. White males from poorer backgrounds are simply not competing by the same averages, unlike minorities from similar restrictions. Females are also above averages of males. Sometimes this is propaganda, stupid narratives, but not without alarm, a larger debate.
The USA is different, every State is different, again in its counties. There are far more illegals. Also different standards. With mass migration, that standard really slides, disgustingly, poverty much worse.
IQ is a bullshit test. It means only towards a standard of teaching apparent with other such education systems. By comparison to their environment how have they adapted. You can presume unintelligent, because it is without educational literacy. In likewise comparisons of perhaps survival, what is intelligence, how has it faired? Hence IQ is a wrongful assumption.
Needless to say there are huge gaps in IQ. An easier assumption is that neither fairs well in contrary environments, not without adopting more than IQ.
Please test it, put Einstein in the jungle, now put a moron from the jungle, back into that jungle. What went wrong. IQ obviously.
The debate gains greater traction of what has shaped since an evolutionary model, how any civilizations have advanced around it. Tired debates based on the assumptions of provided literacy.
Ultimately who cares?
No it is a useless assumption. It is often only from a postion of provided literacy based on the evolutionary model.
Where perhaps genes over time breed intelligence, where others breed strength.
IQ doesn't measure much. In contrary environments how does intellect adapt. Only with the tools and resources at hand in a process of interaction taking much longer to develop. Interaction from primarily conflict. Our species only tends to peak in its advancements from fight or flight. Without it techniques have taken far longer to progress. By conflict it has often assumed literacy or dominance.
I am only here to debate. I don't have to prove my IQ. Unlike look at yours. If that was an intelligent response I pity your IQ, it is the equivalent of a nigger's.
Blacks, despite being in the US and other countries for 5+ generations still significantly have lower iqs than the brown, Asian, and white populations around them. Which means that OPs point still stands. I honestly wish this wasn’t the case. I myself am a minority and it took me a long time to come to terms with this fact.
Do you want me to bring up the education scores in the UK for the last few years. It was a debate held in parliament. White males from poorer backgrounds are simply not competing by the same averages, unlike minorities from similar restrictions. Females are also above averages of males. Sometimes this is propaganda, stupid narratives, but not without alarm, a larger debate.
The USA is different, every State is different, again in its counties. There are far more illegals. Also different standards. With mass migration, that standard really slides, disgustingly, poverty much worse.