IQ is a bullshit test. It means only towards a standard of teaching apparent with other such education systems. By comparison to their environment how have they adapted. You can presume unintelligent, because it is without educational literacy. In likewise comparisons of perhaps survival, what is intelligence, how has it faired? Hence IQ is a wrongful assumption.
Needless to say there are huge gaps in IQ. An easier assumption is that neither fairs well in contrary environments, not without adopting more than IQ.
Please test it, put Einstein in the jungle, now put a moron from the jungle, back into that jungle. What went wrong. IQ obviously.
The debate gains greater traction of what has shaped since an evolutionary model, how any civilizations have advanced around it. Tired debates based on the assumptions of provided literacy.
People fail to grasp that IQ is for comparing members of a homogenous group, not comparing heterogeneous groups. They chimp out like others responding to you.
Test the group, and then scale the curve such that 100 is the mean.
IQ is a bullshit test. It means only towards a standard of teaching apparent with other such education systems. By comparison to their environment how have they adapted. You can presume unintelligent, because it is without educational literacy. In likewise comparisons of perhaps survival, what is intelligence, how has it faired? Hence IQ is a wrongful assumption.
This would be true, only if blacks in places outside of Africa didn’t themselves have significantly lower IQs than whites,Asians, and browns in the same country. So OP’s point still stands.
They don't actually. Since diversity pushes, poor background white males are fairing much worse by comparisons of education. In places like the UK. Although that average is still down by larger proportions. And much more is propaganda. But I can bring it up. Whites from poorer backgrounds are becoming neglected by larger proportions within certain nations.
Again I know plenty of smart people who are as dumb as planks. They're simply smart by educational standards but are clueless at being practical. They simply would not adapt without the Internet.
IQ tests don't mean much. Intelligence is also the ability to adapt. Not simply use technology. It is by much larger degrees making the population much dumber. Today's tech is causing autism in much larger proportions. Skills are faster being replaced, stuff that was once an education a few decades ago like sewing, machine repairing, growing and planting, woodworking, etc etc. Until they're specialist subjects, not many gain averages at. Replaced by consumption and
a reliance solely on technology, causing bigger problems. No longer reading, no longer articulating, or learning much apart from expenditure. Sure they might be smart enough to master a preferred status, it doesn't reflect intelligence.
Your sole argument is on educational standards. It is asserting from dominance the need to sell technology and education, because it facilitates the demand. Real clever.
They don't actually. Since diversity pushes, poor background white males are fairing much worse by comparisons of education. In places like the UK. Although that average is still down by larger proportions. And much more is propaganda. But I can bring it up. Whites from poorer backgrounds are becoming neglected by larger proportions within certain nations.
Do you have sources for this, literally everything I look at testifies to the fact that blacks have worse scores, and higher crimes rates than whites and Asians that are in the same class range as them.
Your sole argument is on educational standards. It is asserting from dominance the need to sell technology and education, because it facilitates the demand. Real clever.
Not true, I’m also saying the lack of iq among blacks also contributes to higher crime rates, and fatherless rates.
Sorry, the "validate my racial paranoia" threads are over at Consume Product. Is there an actual conspiracy you'd like to discuss, or are you just looking for excuses why you had to redo fifth grade three times?
No it is a useless assumption. It is often only from a postion of provided literacy based on the evolutionary model.
Where perhaps genes over time breed intelligence, where others breed strength.
IQ doesn't measure much. In contrary environments how does intellect adapt. Only with the tools and resources at hand in a process of interaction taking much longer to develop. Interaction from primarily conflict. Our species only tends to peak in its advancements from fight or flight. Without it techniques have taken far longer to progress. By conflict it has often assumed literacy or dominance.
I am only here to debate. I don't have to prove my IQ. Unlike look at yours. If that was an intelligent response I pity your IQ, it is the equivalent of a nigger's.
IQ doesn't measure much. In contrary environments how does intellect adapt. Only with the tools and resources at hand in a process of interaction taking much longer to develop. Interaction from primarily conflict.
Blacks, despite being in the US and other countries for 5+ generations still significantly have lower iqs than the brown, Asian, and white populations around them. Which means that OPs point still stands. I honestly wish this wasn’t the case. I myself am a minority and it took me a long time to come to terms with this fact.
Do you want me to bring up the education scores in the UK for the last few years. It was a debate held in parliament. White males from poorer backgrounds are simply not competing by the same averages, unlike minorities from similar restrictions. Females are also above averages of males. Sometimes this is propaganda, stupid narratives, but not without alarm, a larger debate.
The USA is different, every State is different, again in its counties. There are far more illegals. Also different standards. With mass migration, that standard really slides, disgustingly, poverty much worse.
What didn't you comprehend about it, in that brain of yours?
I hate repeating myself to dumb autistic multiple account trolls. I know who you are. You just made yourself obvious on a probability of about 95%. I know your other fucktard accounts too. They match the same idiolect. They are quite generic.
Again IQ is based on educational methods often assuming literacy and other various forms of education. It doesn't necessarily mean intellect. What is intelligence. The ability to read and write, using technology? Or the ability to adapt within environments, surviving? You have therefore projected a baseless assumption. One that often asserts dominance in aid of selling technology and education.
Until one can factually argue in percentages that the human race isn't surviving. It is becoming far more threatened, becoming even dumber by technology. But at least they have some social status.
IQ is a bullshit test. It means only towards a standard of teaching apparent with other such education systems. By comparison to their environment how have they adapted. You can presume unintelligent, because it is without educational literacy. In likewise comparisons of perhaps survival, what is intelligence, how has it faired? Hence IQ is a wrongful assumption.
Needless to say there are huge gaps in IQ. An easier assumption is that neither fairs well in contrary environments, not without adopting more than IQ.
Please test it, put Einstein in the jungle, now put a moron from the jungle, back into that jungle. What went wrong. IQ obviously.
The debate gains greater traction of what has shaped since an evolutionary model, how any civilizations have advanced around it. Tired debates based on the assumptions of provided literacy.
Ultimately who cares?
People fail to grasp that IQ is for comparing members of a homogenous group, not comparing heterogeneous groups. They chimp out like others responding to you.
Test the group, and then scale the curve such that 100 is the mean.
This would be true, only if blacks in places outside of Africa didn’t themselves have significantly lower IQs than whites,Asians, and browns in the same country. So OP’s point still stands.
They don't actually. Since diversity pushes, poor background white males are fairing much worse by comparisons of education. In places like the UK. Although that average is still down by larger proportions. And much more is propaganda. But I can bring it up. Whites from poorer backgrounds are becoming neglected by larger proportions within certain nations.
Again I know plenty of smart people who are as dumb as planks. They're simply smart by educational standards but are clueless at being practical. They simply would not adapt without the Internet.
IQ tests don't mean much. Intelligence is also the ability to adapt. Not simply use technology. It is by much larger degrees making the population much dumber. Today's tech is causing autism in much larger proportions. Skills are faster being replaced, stuff that was once an education a few decades ago like sewing, machine repairing, growing and planting, woodworking, etc etc. Until they're specialist subjects, not many gain averages at. Replaced by consumption and a reliance solely on technology, causing bigger problems. No longer reading, no longer articulating, or learning much apart from expenditure. Sure they might be smart enough to master a preferred status, it doesn't reflect intelligence.
Your sole argument is on educational standards. It is asserting from dominance the need to sell technology and education, because it facilitates the demand. Real clever.
Do you have sources for this, literally everything I look at testifies to the fact that blacks have worse scores, and higher crimes rates than whites and Asians that are in the same class range as them.
Not true, I’m also saying the lack of iq among blacks also contributes to higher crime rates, and fatherless rates.
Blocked.
Sorry, the "validate my racial paranoia" threads are over at Consume Product. Is there an actual conspiracy you'd like to discuss, or are you just looking for excuses why you had to redo fifth grade three times?
No it is a useless assumption. It is often only from a postion of provided literacy based on the evolutionary model.
Where perhaps genes over time breed intelligence, where others breed strength.
IQ doesn't measure much. In contrary environments how does intellect adapt. Only with the tools and resources at hand in a process of interaction taking much longer to develop. Interaction from primarily conflict. Our species only tends to peak in its advancements from fight or flight. Without it techniques have taken far longer to progress. By conflict it has often assumed literacy or dominance.
I am only here to debate. I don't have to prove my IQ. Unlike look at yours. If that was an intelligent response I pity your IQ, it is the equivalent of a nigger's.
Blacks, despite being in the US and other countries for 5+ generations still significantly have lower iqs than the brown, Asian, and white populations around them. Which means that OPs point still stands. I honestly wish this wasn’t the case. I myself am a minority and it took me a long time to come to terms with this fact.
Do you want me to bring up the education scores in the UK for the last few years. It was a debate held in parliament. White males from poorer backgrounds are simply not competing by the same averages, unlike minorities from similar restrictions. Females are also above averages of males. Sometimes this is propaganda, stupid narratives, but not without alarm, a larger debate.
The USA is different, every State is different, again in its counties. There are far more illegals. Also different standards. With mass migration, that standard really slides, disgustingly, poverty much worse.
What didn't you comprehend about it, in that brain of yours?
I hate repeating myself to dumb autistic multiple account trolls. I know who you are. You just made yourself obvious on a probability of about 95%. I know your other fucktard accounts too. They match the same idiolect. They are quite generic.
Again IQ is based on educational methods often assuming literacy and other various forms of education. It doesn't necessarily mean intellect. What is intelligence. The ability to read and write, using technology? Or the ability to adapt within environments, surviving? You have therefore projected a baseless assumption. One that often asserts dominance in aid of selling technology and education.
Until one can factually argue in percentages that the human race isn't surviving. It is becoming far more threatened, becoming even dumber by technology. But at least they have some social status.