Notwithstanding my own theories that the whole conflict is engineered, possibly on both sides (though at least some of the casualties are real, since most people on the lower floors aren't in on it), I'm personally partial to the "liberating Donbass" spiel. At the very least, because NATO set the precedent for it back in the 90's, with Kosovo. So now, whenever a national region wants to declare independence, and there's a strong enough foreign force to assist it, it's all fair play. Sorry, that's how the rules were rewritten, too late for backsies now.
And then there's how NATO nations crap all over themselves at the thought of Iran or North Korea having nukes, yet see nothing wrong with sprinkling military bases and long-range missiles all over the world - because the military alliance that tried to bomb Iraq, Syria and half of Serbia back to the stone age, is certainly non-aggressive and acting only in the best interests of everyone.
Long story short, the balance of power is shifting, and the organization that styled itself the only de facto superpower for the past 30 years, is reaping what it's been sowing for that period, if not even longer.
Russia invaded that fucking place, for mostly bullshit reasons.
Yes. Reasons for any invasion in the world always revealed to be bullshit. It is just common practice, nothing more. It is very strange to blame that on Russia, when for everybody else it is completely OK.
Russia bad, m'kay. Ukraine is a corrupt shithole, but that doesn't have much of anything to do with Russia
Ukraine have everything to do with Russia. It is single etnicity. You could take any Russian and in 99.99% he will have Ukrainian relatives, and vice versa. That shiity war is like TX vs Arisona, f.e.
doesn't give Russia any right to go in and get a bunch of fuckers killed and burn the place down.
Yes. Just like any other military invasion in the world.
Send weapons, not people. I'm cool with it. The weapons are for defense. If Russia moved their stupid tanks, ships, and planes out of Ukraine's boarders, then the Ukrainians wouldn't have to fire fucking javelin and stinger missiles at them.
That does not work like that. Part of that weapons would be seized or destroyed by Russians, and use of other part will induce more Russian tanks, ships and planes inside Ukraine's border, that's all.
The only way to stop that impossible war is an order of NWO to Putin and Biden to stop. Easy as fuck. If NWO want to move more weapons into playground, than it is about more dead white people, not about some "defence" or "help".
It is a staged war. Just another simple fact - Ukraine, since the beginning of the war never ever even tried to attack any target on territory of Russia. If you are in real war against real enemy with military bases within 100km from your capital - wouldnt you at least try to attack enemy infrastructure? Of course you will. And any other sane and independent leader will do it in first place. But not in that case. Zelensky have an order from their masters - in no case try to attack anything on the territory of enemy. That is completely staged. Everything, from fake nAzI to fake invasion.
I already wrote a post that it seems that NWO want to make only few large regions on Earth that will be controlled by few NWO puppets - North America, South America, Africa, Europe, China, Middle East. Don't know about India, it could be another large region, or it will be somehow relate to another.
NWO was burnt with that small stupid "Young Leaders" that made more harm to NWO, than all conspirologists together. Seems that they changed tactic and will establish only few well-known and extremely devoted puppets in control of few large regions that could not be merged yet due to the traces of traditionality that they will try to destroy with much more effort when that few regions will be established.
Ukraine have everything to do with Russia. It is single etnicity. You could take any Russian and in 99.99% he will have Ukrainian relatives, and vice versa.
I've been meaning to ask something related to this. It's not quite a theory yet, more like a musing. So far, the Russian armed forces have both decimated the Ukrainian military bases and defenses, and, for some reason, littered the country with Z-marked military vehicles and assorted gear. Which, as we're meant to believe, are being appropriated by the remaining Ukrainian fighters on a daily basis.
So my question is - how can anyone tell if a Z-marked tank is crewed by Russians or already appropriated by the Ukrainians, given that to most foreigners, the two look and talk exactly alike? Right now, there are even news and social media posts about Russian troops "defecting" to Ukraine, tanks in tow... which is a great way to get your family in the gulag in an actual war, so unless the guys in questions are incubator-grown clones or really pissed at their folks, that's not a likely move.
What I'm musing is, this might be a way to saturate the area with Russian troops under the pretense of defecting - not pretense before the Ukrainians, since they'd likely know the difference, but pretense before foreigners, who wouldn't. So that at a certain point, these brave defectors from dictatorship can quietly occupy all the crucial strategic assets like power plants and water lines, and the world at large wouldn't realize it before it's too late.
Overall, the whole Z thing is something unusual, so maybe that's one way to explain it. So far, however, it's only a musing, not a complete theory by any means.
So my question is - how can anyone tell if a Z-marked tank is crewed by Russians or already appropriated by the Ukrainians, given that to most foreigners, the two look and talk exactly alike?
I don't know. Especially taking in account that this markings (Z and V AFAIK) all made by hand.
What I'm musing is, this might be a way to saturate the area with Russian troops under the pretense of defecting - not pretense before the Ukrainians, since they'd likely know the difference, but pretense before foreigners, who wouldn't. So that at a certain point, these brave defectors from dictatorship can quietly occupy all the crucial strategic assets like power plants and water lines, and the world at large wouldn't realize it before it's too late.
Possible, yes. But I'm being Russian and living in Russia still can't find anything about goal of that war. OK, Putin send troops to do something in Ukraine. So, at what moment it will be announced that war is over? What goals should be acheved to declare the victory? Any war or operation should have some reason and some goal. With that impossible war the reason permanently changing every day, and there is no any declared goal at all.
I think that war have no any goals. That impossible war is a goal itself. They failed with coronahoax, and hoax with "supply chain shortages" rises a lot of unwanted questions, so they need a big distraction and good cover for artificial "shortage" and they easily sacrifice white, intolerant, christian, vaxx-denying population of some Ukraine for that. That point of view perfectly explain all that insanity and stupidity of what we really see in that mess, especially if we apply some effort to slip behind the curtains of propaganda.
So, that Z's and V's is just another way to make everything as uncertain as possible in that mess.
In my impression, the real goal of the war is to serve as an excuse for the various economic sanctions, the cutting of business and political relations between key national blocs - basically Cold War 2.0.
So now I'm looking at the finer details, to try and figure out how the theatrical spin will go. Including how the conflict will be declared "over". At this point, the options I see are:
Putin getting "deposed", with a successor, perhaps Medvedev but I'm not too sold on him, taking the reins while continuing to cool relations with the west.
Zelensky going off his meds, declaring total war while antagonizing the west for not helping him enough, so that when Russia effectively takes possession of the country, it's seen as a necessary evil.
Zelensky getting "killed" as a martyr, with Putin becoming the official evil bogeyman of the west (sorry, Pooh Bear), solidifying the new opposition of international blocs for the foreseeable future.
Mind you, I'm also noting this happens in the year of the American mid-term elections, combined with dirt on Biden and his Ukraine ties crawling into the limelight, and even Trump getting extra screentime again. Though again, these are mostly musings that I haven't begun to fit into a comprehensive theory.
Possible. They did that trick with Medvedev already.
This will mean that Ukraine become independent from NWO. Higly improbable, that will mean that NWO shills - Europe and Russia just teardown Ukraine in pieces. Interesting, that Poland MSM already published maps where Ukraine is teared down in parts, with Lvov region as part of Poland (historically correct, that part of Ukraine was part of Poland).
Possible too. But I doubt about opposition. Evil Putin will carefully play role of next Evil Xi, for example, while the West will copy that nice "social credit" system from China, which will be based on loyalty to the Western elites, and all who will resist will be marked as Evil Putin shills.
Though again, these are mostly musings that I haven't begun to fit into a comprehensive theory.
I think it will be hard to fit anywhere, because they literally creating chaos and nonsence, some kind of smoke screen to run their real shit on us. May be it will be reasonable to take a look on what the hell is going behind that smoke screen...
I am not. Giving guns to monkeys, only kills more monkeys, then we pay double. We gotta protect the monkeys, giving them even more guns, we have to train the monkeys how to use our guns, sending in specialists, and still somehow we have also got to house all the monkeys. More inflation. More crime. Less services strained.
It would be simpler if we weren't involved, because almost anything is better than listening to monkeys. Zelenskyy is definitely not my president. Except we could get hit, and at any rate we probably will, they're running out of monkeys, and our guns.
Aside we are involved on a war level. But does it need final approval. Just 2 more weeks, there's still a few more monkeys.
If we didn't give the monkeys guns, there wouldn't be as much monkey business. The propaganda is worse than the war. They'd surrender or something.
We could simply bolster our allied defenses. But hey they weren't selling without a war facilitating their demand.
They do, without our guns. There wouldn't be as many dead monkeys. But we are fighting Russia see. When do we fight them objectively instead of hiding behind monkeys? In 2 more weeks?
Which Monkeys? I am quite sure Crimea is Russian it has Sevastopol located on it. What about Donbass and Luhansk Oblast. What about a larger population of kindred people who once shared a language and history?
I am quite sure giving them opposing guns, kills them? But if it makes you sleep.
If they weren't armed would they fight each other? But fair enough if you're fighting for them, I mean why not, they're fighting for you. But damn those nukes, it was much simpler before they came along. Wars were once upon a time ago won. Instead of fought in the shadows, behind human shields, and armies of monkeys.
Notwithstanding my own theories that the whole conflict is engineered, possibly on both sides (though at least some of the casualties are real, since most people on the lower floors aren't in on it), I'm personally partial to the "liberating Donbass" spiel. At the very least, because NATO set the precedent for it back in the 90's, with Kosovo. So now, whenever a national region wants to declare independence, and there's a strong enough foreign force to assist it, it's all fair play. Sorry, that's how the rules were rewritten, too late for backsies now.
And then there's how NATO nations crap all over themselves at the thought of Iran or North Korea having nukes, yet see nothing wrong with sprinkling military bases and long-range missiles all over the world - because the military alliance that tried to bomb Iraq, Syria and half of Serbia back to the stone age, is certainly non-aggressive and acting only in the best interests of everyone.
Long story short, the balance of power is shifting, and the organization that styled itself the only de facto superpower for the past 30 years, is reaping what it's been sowing for that period, if not even longer.
Dude, what happened? Why are you on the NWO side all of a sudden?
Yes. Reasons for any invasion in the world always revealed to be bullshit. It is just common practice, nothing more. It is very strange to blame that on Russia, when for everybody else it is completely OK.
Ukraine have everything to do with Russia. It is single etnicity. You could take any Russian and in 99.99% he will have Ukrainian relatives, and vice versa. That shiity war is like TX vs Arisona, f.e.
Yes. Just like any other military invasion in the world.
That does not work like that. Part of that weapons would be seized or destroyed by Russians, and use of other part will induce more Russian tanks, ships and planes inside Ukraine's border, that's all.
The only way to stop that impossible war is an order of NWO to Putin and Biden to stop. Easy as fuck. If NWO want to move more weapons into playground, than it is about more dead white people, not about some "defence" or "help".
It is a staged war. Just another simple fact - Ukraine, since the beginning of the war never ever even tried to attack any target on territory of Russia. If you are in real war against real enemy with military bases within 100km from your capital - wouldnt you at least try to attack enemy infrastructure? Of course you will. And any other sane and independent leader will do it in first place. But not in that case. Zelensky have an order from their masters - in no case try to attack anything on the territory of enemy. That is completely staged. Everything, from fake nAzI to fake invasion.
I already wrote a post that it seems that NWO want to make only few large regions on Earth that will be controlled by few NWO puppets - North America, South America, Africa, Europe, China, Middle East. Don't know about India, it could be another large region, or it will be somehow relate to another.
NWO was burnt with that small stupid "Young Leaders" that made more harm to NWO, than all conspirologists together. Seems that they changed tactic and will establish only few well-known and extremely devoted puppets in control of few large regions that could not be merged yet due to the traces of traditionality that they will try to destroy with much more effort when that few regions will be established.
I've been meaning to ask something related to this. It's not quite a theory yet, more like a musing. So far, the Russian armed forces have both decimated the Ukrainian military bases and defenses, and, for some reason, littered the country with Z-marked military vehicles and assorted gear. Which, as we're meant to believe, are being appropriated by the remaining Ukrainian fighters on a daily basis.
So my question is - how can anyone tell if a Z-marked tank is crewed by Russians or already appropriated by the Ukrainians, given that to most foreigners, the two look and talk exactly alike? Right now, there are even news and social media posts about Russian troops "defecting" to Ukraine, tanks in tow... which is a great way to get your family in the gulag in an actual war, so unless the guys in questions are incubator-grown clones or really pissed at their folks, that's not a likely move.
What I'm musing is, this might be a way to saturate the area with Russian troops under the pretense of defecting - not pretense before the Ukrainians, since they'd likely know the difference, but pretense before foreigners, who wouldn't. So that at a certain point, these brave defectors from dictatorship can quietly occupy all the crucial strategic assets like power plants and water lines, and the world at large wouldn't realize it before it's too late.
Overall, the whole Z thing is something unusual, so maybe that's one way to explain it. So far, however, it's only a musing, not a complete theory by any means.
I don't know. Especially taking in account that this markings (Z and V AFAIK) all made by hand.
Possible, yes. But I'm being Russian and living in Russia still can't find anything about goal of that war. OK, Putin send troops to do something in Ukraine. So, at what moment it will be announced that war is over? What goals should be acheved to declare the victory? Any war or operation should have some reason and some goal. With that impossible war the reason permanently changing every day, and there is no any declared goal at all.
I think that war have no any goals. That impossible war is a goal itself. They failed with coronahoax, and hoax with "supply chain shortages" rises a lot of unwanted questions, so they need a big distraction and good cover for artificial "shortage" and they easily sacrifice white, intolerant, christian, vaxx-denying population of some Ukraine for that. That point of view perfectly explain all that insanity and stupidity of what we really see in that mess, especially if we apply some effort to slip behind the curtains of propaganda.
So, that Z's and V's is just another way to make everything as uncertain as possible in that mess.
In my impression, the real goal of the war is to serve as an excuse for the various economic sanctions, the cutting of business and political relations between key national blocs - basically Cold War 2.0.
So now I'm looking at the finer details, to try and figure out how the theatrical spin will go. Including how the conflict will be declared "over". At this point, the options I see are:
Putin getting "deposed", with a successor, perhaps Medvedev but I'm not too sold on him, taking the reins while continuing to cool relations with the west.
Zelensky going off his meds, declaring total war while antagonizing the west for not helping him enough, so that when Russia effectively takes possession of the country, it's seen as a necessary evil.
Zelensky getting "killed" as a martyr, with Putin becoming the official evil bogeyman of the west (sorry, Pooh Bear), solidifying the new opposition of international blocs for the foreseeable future.
Mind you, I'm also noting this happens in the year of the American mid-term elections, combined with dirt on Biden and his Ukraine ties crawling into the limelight, and even Trump getting extra screentime again. Though again, these are mostly musings that I haven't begun to fit into a comprehensive theory.
I think it will be hard to fit anywhere, because they literally creating chaos and nonsence, some kind of smoke screen to run their real shit on us. May be it will be reasonable to take a look on what the hell is going behind that smoke screen...
I am not. Giving guns to monkeys, only kills more monkeys, then we pay double. We gotta protect the monkeys, giving them even more guns, we have to train the monkeys how to use our guns, sending in specialists, and still somehow we have also got to house all the monkeys. More inflation. More crime. Less services strained.
It would be simpler if we weren't involved, because almost anything is better than listening to monkeys. Zelenskyy is definitely not my president. Except we could get hit, and at any rate we probably will, they're running out of monkeys, and our guns.
Aside we are involved on a war level. But does it need final approval. Just 2 more weeks, there's still a few more monkeys.
If we didn't give the monkeys guns, there wouldn't be as much monkey business. The propaganda is worse than the war. They'd surrender or something.
We could simply bolster our allied defenses. But hey they weren't selling without a war facilitating their demand.
They do, without our guns. There wouldn't be as many dead monkeys. But we are fighting Russia see. When do we fight them objectively instead of hiding behind monkeys? In 2 more weeks?
Which Monkeys? I am quite sure Crimea is Russian it has Sevastopol located on it. What about Donbass and Luhansk Oblast. What about a larger population of kindred people who once shared a language and history?
I am quite sure giving them opposing guns, kills them? But if it makes you sleep.
If they weren't armed would they fight each other? But fair enough if you're fighting for them, I mean why not, they're fighting for you. But damn those nukes, it was much simpler before they came along. Wars were once upon a time ago won. Instead of fought in the shadows, behind human shields, and armies of monkeys.