I'm not too much of a follower myself. You can't learn the secrets of this world by simply one person. You have to learn from multiple individuals of multiple different backgrounds. Finding the extraordinary individual is difficult. By creating followers, they can lead them. That's my best assumption. Hit the follow, like and subscribe button for me. That's exactly what they say. Don't do that for me, block me if you'd like. It's your decision.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
a) that's because a secret implies withheld information as suggested by others; to which you already consented...otherwise you wouldn't want suggested secrets from others.
Meanwhile; this "perceivable" world doesn't communicate in secrecy, it moves everything to communicate inspiration towards perceiving senses. The illuminated simply adapt to the perceived source of light; while struggling to resist the suggested darkness.
"exit light" (exit comprehension) "enter night" (enter ignorance) "take my hand" (consent to suggestion) "we're off to never-, neverland" (diminished growth potential).
b) person aka per sonos (by sound). Each ONE represents by ALL sound perceived.
"from" implies by their suggested information; "through" implies utilizing others within balance as perceived inspiration (need) or suggested information (want). To learn implies to teach self and vice versa aka growing comprehension by adaptation to perceived. Others represent tools used for the growth (need) of comprehension of for diminishing it (want).
What if collective balance represents the background; foundation; source of every individual choice within? Before you fall for the temptation of what individuals suggest; consider what individualizes them?
Of course; because one has to ignore the highest value in all perceivable existence...ones choice of evaluation.The one you're suggested to look for represents the one you want to put over yourself; the one you can shirk responsibility of choice onto; while following him towards death.
Life is tempted to follow; yet demanded to resist being moved; hence choice within balance.
The few suggest creationism (out of nothing); while using idolatry (suggested meaning to worship) to sell it to the consenting many who are tempted into ignorance.
"hit like & subscribe" represents allegory for "choose want & submit"
I know some people think you're a bot. And if you are, that's okay by me. Questioning and thinking is the goal here.
The sleight of hand: "I am whatever you say I am...if I wasn't, then why would I say I am?" implies that the suggestions of others cannot define who you are; unless you consent to them. What others suggest you are; represents a label upon what's being perceived beforehand.
I was before you can suggest what I am...so why would I consent to ignore the perceived (inspiration) for the suggested (information); which would give others to power to define what I am.
What's interesting about the "bot" label; is that those suggesting it are diminishing themselves under technology. They also accuse me of being too different; while accusing others of being NPC's aka same acting order followers.
As for yourself...it doesn't matter what I am; but what you choose to shape out of it for the sustenance of self. Not as responses to me or others; but as your expression of self within everything.
Quests towards goals imply outcome orientation. Is life outcome oriented (towards death) or the resistance to being moved towards predefined outcome (death) for the sustenance of self?
What if your origin (balance) represents the solution to every answer (choice), and you the expression within (growth or loss)?
As for thinking...can you choose to not think in response to perceived input? Can that which is moved choose to not respond to movement...or does that represent self corrupting ignorance?
"As for thinking...can you choose to not think in response to perceived input?"
Being married, you learn to master this.