Yes. It assumes more than it provides. Where there are certain facts within turned into conjecture.
The people who rule the World aren't religious. They use religion when it suites a narrative perhaps. They sold their souls long ago, their religion is only power and greed.
But the offered Ukrainian, is a mixed bag of history that has falsified some of those facts, creating Jews everywhere else.
It turned Cossacks into Jews. It claims Jews are the lost tribes of some place called Kazaria. Instead of Ukraine being Roman, then Ottoman. Then Russian Monarchy. As cossacks led a revolt.
Weren't Scythians, Huns, and possibly also Mongols. They were the Horselords of the steppes that Alexander the Great led? Horses spanned the globe at one point. Nomadic tribes ruled by the Khan's. Or somebody powerful enough to unite them. Like Attilia, Genghis, Alexander. History might lay other claims. Because it needs to paint narratives.
Isn't there a massive conspiracy on the origin of Jews.
Rather then reading of the tribes of here and there and where ever. It's not to say otherwise, it is a global religion. Dubiously they weren't scythians. But wasn't that origin compiled after leaving Babylon, when Jerusalem was rebuilt? It was adopted off of common narratives mostly Summerian, into a history that is often quite mythological.
What it means today. I don't know. But the bible is also a fraud, origin. That history offered isn't very factual.
Yes. It assumes more than it provides. Where there are certain facts within turned into conjecture.
The people who rule the World aren't religious. They use religion when it suites a narrative perhaps. They sold their souls long ago, their religion is only power and greed.
But the offered Ukrainian, is a mixed bag of history that has falsified some of those facts, creating Jews everywhere else.
Tell me, who are the Cossacks?
It turned Cossacks into Jews. It claims Jews are the lost tribes of some place called Kazaria. Instead of Ukraine being Roman, then Ottoman. Then Russian Monarchy. As cossacks led a revolt.
Weren't Scythians, Huns, and possibly also Mongols. They were the Horselords of the steppes that Alexander the Great led? Horses spanned the globe at one point. Nomadic tribes ruled by the Khan's. Or somebody powerful enough to unite them. Like Attilia, Genghis, Alexander. History might lay other claims. Because it needs to paint narratives.
Isn't there a massive conspiracy on the origin of Jews.
Rather then reading of the tribes of here and there and where ever. It's not to say otherwise, it is a global religion. Dubiously they weren't scythians. But wasn't that origin compiled after leaving Babylon, when Jerusalem was rebuilt? It was adopted off of common narratives mostly Summerian, into a history that is often quite mythological.
What it means today. I don't know. But the bible is also a fraud, origin. That history offered isn't very factual.