It's strange to me that she would not have mentioned in 2020 Ukraine having terrorized it's citizens for 5 years, or having said in 2015 that Ukraine has just begun terrorizing its citizens.
Only now, after military invasion, did she decide to reveal these horrors that are 'definitely true and not something propagandists made up just this month'.
PER- CEPTION: PER- meaning each Form contributes individual Flow to the One. -CEPTION meaning capture, to bring within One's own boundary. The Flow shares its Form with each One.
Only now, after military invasion, did she decide to reveal these horrors that are 'definitely true and not something propagandists made up just this month'.
Resist the suggested information (want vs not want) and keep pointing out the perceived inspiration (need/want). What's the balance between the few wanting the many to consent to the suggested narrative, and each of the many needing to consent to any suggested narrative?
In other words...instead of biting (suggested); keep questioning hunger (perceived) and you will quickly notice that others just bark; seldom bite...they use suggestion to trick you into biting for them.
PER- meaning each Form contributes individual Flow to the One.
If form responds to being moved by flow as choice to balance (momentum); then is that a contribution by the responding form or does it imply form being processed by flow?
When you say "individual flow" you refer to form having the "free" will of choice to respond to the "dom"inance of balance (momentum) within flow (inception towards death) aka free-dom.
In other words...you moving; while being the response to movement does not represent you being a source for flow. Individual (form) implies out of collective (flow). Only within momentum (balance) can form have the free will of choice over directions; while being moved in one direction (inception towards death) by flow.
As for contributing to the One...the ONEness of ALL (flow/form) implies EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka the internal balance of flow/form aka loss/growth aka velocity/resistance aka electric/magnetic aka ongoing/temporary aka potentiality/potential aka ALL/ONE (the sleight of hand for that is being "alone").
Each ONE (form) within ALL (flow) only has a temporary choice; because of the ongoing balance (momentum) caused by flow for the form within. Both together represent the ONEness (energy) of ALL (flow/form). Sleight of hand for that: "all for one and one for all".
-CEPTION meaning capture, to bring within One's own boundary.
From capere - "take, seize," from PIE root kap - "to grasp". ONE exists temporarily at the center of ALL perceivable balance; hence representing "free" will of choice in response to "dom"iance of balance (free-dom). Balance represents the dominating boundary for the choice within, and responding as choice to balance represents adaptation to perceived inspiration (from within spirit aka spiro - "to breathe") as opposed to suggested information (from within form).
As form within flow aka as temporary resistance (growth) within ongoing velocity (loss)...the seed of ONEs growth happens within the soil of ALL loss; which requires the struggle of self sustenance. This struggle through adaptation to perceived is what grows internal comprehension of externally perceived (compressed within ONE out of ALL perceived).
From the energy perspective...ongoing velocity represents electric flow; temporary resistance within electric flow represents magnetic form. Recharging form requires adaptation to the charging flow (perceived inspiration); while being constantly tempted to discharge among other form (suggested information).
The use of words like capture; seizing; taking; owning; claiming etc. exploits the choice of want over need aka the temptation to ignore response-ability as choice to balance (need/want) instead of falling for the imbalance of wanting vs not wanting to capture; seize; take; own; claim etc. what others are suggesting. For example...if you're thirsty then you need to drink; which makes any drop a utilization for the sustenance of self. Meanwhile; taking liquids for taste; for storage; for control; for fear; for hope and so on...those represent want over need choices aka you falling for temptations.
In short...ONE can utilize ALL offered; yet not claim any other ONEs without the consequences of ignorance. A recent sleight of hand for that was "you will own nothing and you will be happy"; which represents the status quo of existence for those with eyes to see; yet tempts all those who ignore the status quo into responding like "you don't get my stuff" and "how dare you want to take what I have?".
https://archive.ph/NoDdW (for those who can't access the url)
Yes little johnny. Yes they will and are. Welcome to USSA comrade!
They are emulating China.
They are all one big happy incestuous family.
It's a big club, and you ain't in it.
ALL IN A LIP (allegory for suggestion over perception).
It's strange to me that she would not have mentioned in 2020 Ukraine having terrorized it's citizens for 5 years, or having said in 2015 that Ukraine has just begun terrorizing its citizens.
Only now, after military invasion, did she decide to reveal these horrors that are 'definitely true and not something propagandists made up just this month'.
PER- CEPTION: PER- meaning each Form contributes individual Flow to the One. -CEPTION meaning capture, to bring within One's own boundary. The Flow shares its Form with each One.
Apparently she only moved there last year and has been reporting since that time.
Here is her website:
Neues aus Russland http://neuesausrussland.online/
Resist the suggested information (want vs not want) and keep pointing out the perceived inspiration (need/want). What's the balance between the few wanting the many to consent to the suggested narrative, and each of the many needing to consent to any suggested narrative?
In other words...instead of biting (suggested); keep questioning hunger (perceived) and you will quickly notice that others just bark; seldom bite...they use suggestion to trick you into biting for them.
If form responds to being moved by flow as choice to balance (momentum); then is that a contribution by the responding form or does it imply form being processed by flow?
When you say "individual flow" you refer to form having the "free" will of choice to respond to the "dom"inance of balance (momentum) within flow (inception towards death) aka free-dom.
In other words...you moving; while being the response to movement does not represent you being a source for flow. Individual (form) implies out of collective (flow). Only within momentum (balance) can form have the free will of choice over directions; while being moved in one direction (inception towards death) by flow.
As for contributing to the One...the ONEness of ALL (flow/form) implies EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka the internal balance of flow/form aka loss/growth aka velocity/resistance aka electric/magnetic aka ongoing/temporary aka potentiality/potential aka ALL/ONE (the sleight of hand for that is being "alone").
Each ONE (form) within ALL (flow) only has a temporary choice; because of the ongoing balance (momentum) caused by flow for the form within. Both together represent the ONEness (energy) of ALL (flow/form). Sleight of hand for that: "all for one and one for all".
From capere - "take, seize," from PIE root kap - "to grasp". ONE exists temporarily at the center of ALL perceivable balance; hence representing "free" will of choice in response to "dom"iance of balance (free-dom). Balance represents the dominating boundary for the choice within, and responding as choice to balance represents adaptation to perceived inspiration (from within spirit aka spiro - "to breathe") as opposed to suggested information (from within form).
As form within flow aka as temporary resistance (growth) within ongoing velocity (loss)...the seed of ONEs growth happens within the soil of ALL loss; which requires the struggle of self sustenance. This struggle through adaptation to perceived is what grows internal comprehension of externally perceived (compressed within ONE out of ALL perceived).
From the energy perspective...ongoing velocity represents electric flow; temporary resistance within electric flow represents magnetic form. Recharging form requires adaptation to the charging flow (perceived inspiration); while being constantly tempted to discharge among other form (suggested information).
The use of words like capture; seizing; taking; owning; claiming etc. exploits the choice of want over need aka the temptation to ignore response-ability as choice to balance (need/want) instead of falling for the imbalance of wanting vs not wanting to capture; seize; take; own; claim etc. what others are suggesting. For example...if you're thirsty then you need to drink; which makes any drop a utilization for the sustenance of self. Meanwhile; taking liquids for taste; for storage; for control; for fear; for hope and so on...those represent want over need choices aka you falling for temptations.
In short...ONE can utilize ALL offered; yet not claim any other ONEs without the consequences of ignorance. A recent sleight of hand for that was "you will own nothing and you will be happy"; which represents the status quo of existence for those with eyes to see; yet tempts all those who ignore the status quo into responding like "you don't get my stuff" and "how dare you want to take what I have?".