That would be the reference to the "Roman SOLAR CULT calendar, product of those that are CONDEMNED for thinking "to change times and laws". Which, apparently, "will end and be destroyed, and the world will return to Yahweh's calendar ... of course AFTER a major purge of those in rebellion to His ways"
Or in other words, people can't even choose when to take a holiday, or fear genocidal retribution. Not exactly a freedom-loving mindset, I'd say.
By all means, let's make it "institutions can't choose how to set the calendar", again for the same genocidal reasons. So, why not? What's so wrong about it? If anything, the solar calendar is far more useful as an agricultural measure, since the months follow seasons a lot more accurately. Never mind the stroke of genius that was the leap year, since that streamlined things further. So again, what's the big transgression here? What's the cardinal sin of... having a calendar that's actually useful for practical purposes?
Next thing you'll tell me that Christmas is satanic, because the date is set under the solar calendar... fittingly, again by the Romans, since that's when they celebrated the solstice.
Why, did I personally change the calendar or something? I mean, I'm all for a four-day workweek, but somehow, that doesn't strike me as a cardinal sin against the creator.
So, to ask the question edgewise: What is wrong with changing the calendar? What is wrong with basing months and dates on the Earth's position around the Sun, rather than lunar cycles? What is wrong with having holidays based around practical utility rather than religious doctrine?
That would be the reference to the "Roman SOLAR CULT calendar, product of those that are CONDEMNED for thinking "to change times and laws". Which, apparently, "will end and be destroyed, and the world will return to Yahweh's calendar ... of course AFTER a major purge of those in rebellion to His ways"
Or in other words, people can't even choose when to take a holiday, or fear genocidal retribution. Not exactly a freedom-loving mindset, I'd say.
Nope, that's not what he is saying. Why lie? That is not "in other words".
He's talking about institutions that changed the calendar.
Not really tough to understand.
By all means, let's make it "institutions can't choose how to set the calendar", again for the same genocidal reasons. So, why not? What's so wrong about it? If anything, the solar calendar is far more useful as an agricultural measure, since the months follow seasons a lot more accurately. Never mind the stroke of genius that was the leap year, since that streamlined things further. So again, what's the big transgression here? What's the cardinal sin of... having a calendar that's actually useful for practical purposes?
Next thing you'll tell me that Christmas is satanic, because the date is set under the solar calendar... fittingly, again by the Romans, since that's when they celebrated the solstice.
Yeah, you have good intentions.
Who were good people looking out for the well-being of everyone, right?
Like the Vatican today?
Again, you don't seem to understand the point.
You attacking the OP personally, duh.
Why, did I personally change the calendar or something? I mean, I'm all for a four-day workweek, but somehow, that doesn't strike me as a cardinal sin against the creator.
So, to ask the question edgewise: What is wrong with changing the calendar? What is wrong with basing months and dates on the Earth's position around the Sun, rather than lunar cycles? What is wrong with having holidays based around practical utility rather than religious doctrine?
You have to change his words to your own fake bullshit.
You don't love freedom if you are telling him to leave and create his own sub.
Why lie?