Why not if it stops the refugees. It's a big turn off. You've escaped war to get drafted. We're full. See how that works. It would also stop inflation. It would create affordable housing, and nationalise production into better operation, generating infrastructure, it would create better education. It would also increase birth rates. It would stop nonsensical vanity projects. It would spread wealth. It would decrease crime.
Only an idiot wouldn't want national service. You're parroting those who profit more, like any corps rivalled.
National service solves a lot of today's problems except it often creates conflict.
How can you support patriotism. But then cow to globohomos.
You see what national service does? It nationalises. In doing so it repairs society. We've literally had up to our eyeballs in excrement since the days when it was a duty.
Every single problem today increasingly is quite ammended by it. The down side is often conflict. Not always. But yeah it could be.
However you're focused on one negative instead of how it actually builds. What it causes. Not warfare the obvious. Who wants WW3? Today some would welcome it over this mess. It frankly is disgusting. In comparison to Post WW2. But service. Education. Infrastructure. Duty. In doing so spreads wealth. Decreases crime. Increases birth rates.
You're parroting the globohomos thinking they've made this planet better by their stereotypes. Until where are we at?
Taxation builds directly into the nation servicing instead of paying China. Investment is going where. Infrastructure faster rebuilds. Services become nationalised, instead of the constant inflation and taxation. Refugees sooner stop their increasing numbers accosting you.
It was always in the constitution. It didn't want to fight foreign wars either, rather rally and patriotism.
I agree. But look at places with national service. For any real argument.
The argument then becomes. What does it improve. Almost all of both Britain and America and Europe were nationalised then. A utopia in comparison to today. Public services like transport, infrastructure, manufacture, perhaps healthcare, housing was affordable and were nationalised, working better than they do now. We have lots of services that have saturated increasing inflation and constant taxation. Taxation is funnelling abroad, often into investment of returning even more refugees. The more migration the greater the economy. Except fucko, no, take Britain it was number one in the 60s then it swamped in the 70s. Education wasn't get your degree in wokism either, or some other fictional farts and crafts of nonsense producing another stereotype from God forbid. It was mostly better for all, instead of creating obesity and increasing crime. Wealth was spread out. Boomers as a result were wealthier than the later generations, apart from its decreasing assholes of today.
Your entire speal against is quite mistaken. You're focused on war and not improving it. Omg take any marching orders. Without realising everybody is singing the same tune. Instead of this, what is this today?
Draft, why not. Seriously? I would be going with my countrymen. We have one of the best trained military's on the planet. Today declining. But the standard is in the top. Hell front line or not, I would be in good company.
But I am not taking about draft. I am talking about national service. Everybody does it for x amount of years, normally 2-3. It would repair society overnight.
Why not if it stops the refugees. It's a big turn off. You've escaped war to get drafted. We're full. See how that works. It would also stop inflation. It would create affordable housing, and nationalise production into better operation, generating infrastructure, it would create better education. It would also increase birth rates. It would stop nonsensical vanity projects. It would spread wealth. It would decrease crime.
Only an idiot wouldn't want national service. You're parroting those who profit more, like any corps rivalled.
National service solves a lot of today's problems except it often creates conflict.
And it's in the constitution. 2nd ammendment.
Less of that of everyone has skin in the game.
How can you support patriotism. But then cow to globohomos.
You see what national service does? It nationalises. In doing so it repairs society. We've literally had up to our eyeballs in excrement since the days when it was a duty.
Every single problem today increasingly is quite ammended by it. The down side is often conflict. Not always. But yeah it could be.
However you're focused on one negative instead of how it actually builds. What it causes. Not warfare the obvious. Who wants WW3? Today some would welcome it over this mess. It frankly is disgusting. In comparison to Post WW2. But service. Education. Infrastructure. Duty. In doing so spreads wealth. Decreases crime. Increases birth rates.
You're parroting the globohomos thinking they've made this planet better by their stereotypes. Until where are we at?
Taxation builds directly into the nation servicing instead of paying China. Investment is going where. Infrastructure faster rebuilds. Services become nationalised, instead of the constant inflation and taxation. Refugees sooner stop their increasing numbers accosting you.
It was always in the constitution. It didn't want to fight foreign wars either, rather rally and patriotism.
I agree. But look at places with national service. For any real argument.
The argument then becomes. What does it improve. Almost all of both Britain and America and Europe were nationalised then. A utopia in comparison to today. Public services like transport, infrastructure, manufacture, perhaps healthcare, housing was affordable and were nationalised, working better than they do now. We have lots of services that have saturated increasing inflation and constant taxation. Taxation is funnelling abroad, often into investment of returning even more refugees. The more migration the greater the economy. Except fucko, no, take Britain it was number one in the 60s then it swamped in the 70s. Education wasn't get your degree in wokism either, or some other fictional farts and crafts of nonsense producing another stereotype from God forbid. It was mostly better for all, instead of creating obesity and increasing crime. Wealth was spread out. Boomers as a result were wealthier than the later generations, apart from its decreasing assholes of today.
Your entire speal against is quite mistaken. You're focused on war and not improving it. Omg take any marching orders. Without realising everybody is singing the same tune. Instead of this, what is this today?
Like how you hope Biden grows a set of balls and invades a sovereign country?
You are a Satanist just like Biden.
so you are for it? aight..you go first ;)
Draft, why not. Seriously? I would be going with my countrymen. We have one of the best trained military's on the planet. Today declining. But the standard is in the top. Hell front line or not, I would be in good company.
But I am not taking about draft. I am talking about national service. Everybody does it for x amount of years, normally 2-3. It would repair society overnight.