It Is to try to get us to doubt us about each other. This is happening on so many boards.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Every suggested narrative represents information for you to uphold within your memory (mind); while you ignore being within a moving system (life being moved from inception towards death).
The parasitic few stack suggested information within your mind; while the ongoing system is breaking it apart. You ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information; which is what traumatize you when the perceived reality takes apart the suggested fiction. Meanwhile that parasites are keep fueling the fiction with endless more suggestions to keep the consenting many in ignorance of the ongoing reality.
Any suggested information towards your choice represents for you the choice to want or not want it. Whichever you choose will put you into a conflict with all those who chose the other side of the same suggestion. Want versus not want (imbalance) is being suggested by the parasitic few to mean "reason; logic"; which is what deceives the ignorant many to reason themselves out of conflicts; while ignoring that reason represents the conflict.
Choice represents the response to perceived balance (need/want); while being tempted by suggested choices of others (want vs not want).
Both suggestions by the few for the many to choose to want or not want them. Either choice represents consent to suggested; which gives those who suggest the consent required to define; redefine and contradict the suggested meaning at their free will of choice.
The also weave notices of liability (sleight of hand) within the suggested information like vaccine (from vacca; cow) and man-dates.
Before one can choose to want or not want any suggested side; one represents the response-ability of choice within the perceived balance (need/want) of the ongoing system, and being the response to being moved implies being the temporary force of resistance (growth) to the ongoing force of velocity (loss).
You need to struggle to resist the temptations of others; not fighting each other about what is suggested.
The "power" the parasitic few are wielding represents the ignorance of the many who consent to follow the suggested orders of the few; while ignoring to resist the natural order moving them towards death.
It's the many who believe to be within a game; that ignore that the highest value (balance) within all existence represents ones evaluation (choice) thereof. Within the rhetoric of a game (playing to achieve a price) you already represent the biggest price that can be (ones existence within all), and you can even grow yourself while being one (choice) within all (balance).
Only if one chooses to ignore being the center (choice) of perceived balance (need/want); can the suggestions by other choices tempt one into imbalance (want vs not what). That latter represents the sides you find yourself stuck within, yet they exist only within your memory; upheld by your free will of choice; while causing self destruction; corruption; restriction etc.
Go outside; look at any other life-form...do they also need to choose a side within the conflict that torments your mind? If not; why not? How can you coexist in the same habitat with all these other life-forms; while being stuck within a conflict by yourself?
Aka red shield; an allegory for protector of blood aka bloodlines. Their lesser suggested name is "Bauer" (German for farmer). If only one could choose to farm all perceived for the self sustenance of ones bloodline; instead of ignoring it for the suggested conflicts with other.
If one slaughters the rothschild dynasty; then does that make the ignorant many less susceptible to fall for the temptation of suggestions by a parasitic few? What about host response-ability (choice) over shirking it by blaming others?
fuck off bot.
Would you like to talk a little about lust?
How about we investigate together what I would be used for as a bot? Pushing of narratives? Distraction from mainstream topics? Harvesting of information? Do I seem to be used for the usual talmudic shenanigans of reasoning? Does me doing my own thing (adaptation to inspiration) seem to be utilized to disturb communities? Is there any sacred cow topic I protect? Am I glow-niggering others into violent threats? Am I subverting the beliefs of others with questions their chosen beliefs restrict them from answering?
Do you have any topic; you feel comfortable enough in, to let me poke it by use of free will of choice?
For discretionary purposes? Fighting in the open is the best and most humorous option.
How funny would it be to undermine the suggested conflict without consenting to choose a side within it?
Satanists don't get how tone deaf they are...and it's great!
It's like Lady Gaga doing halftime at the Super Bowl...full of yuks.