That "Ukrainian Nazis" narrative is a lie too.
Yes, Ukrainian nazis exists (existed?) and they definitely not in great love with Russians and Polish people. But in the first place their main enemy is Jews. They even agreed to make an alliances with Russians and Polish to resist Jewish invasion and power seizure in Ukraine. There was even some kind of agreement between Russian and Ukrainian nationalists about mutual sanctuary, and there was cases when it perfectly worked. Russian and Ukraininan nationalists cooperated in the fight against muslims invasion too. In the past they participated in different Slavic Nationalist Union meetings and had no any problems with coexistence with Polish and Russians nationalists. AFAIK all questions among Slavic nations was set on hold by most nationalistic movements due to the growing and obvious threat of NWO and muslims invasion in Europe. That was up to the events of 2014.
Take a look, f.e. - https://last24.info/read/2014/11/20/3/4863 (in Russian, use online translator Google translate f.e.). Don't forget that it is still a propaganda, but the cooperation between Russain and Ukrainian nationalists was a real thing and that could be still true, taking in account that after 2014 Jewish power seizure MSM began to show some other Ukrainian nazis nobody know about.
Russian nationalists even got offers from FSB and Russian Federation state officials to head LPR/DPR but denied, because don't account Ukraininans as enemies. Check Dmitry Demushkin case, f.e. https://khpg.org/en/1608809502 (in English)
There is possibility that real Ukrainian nationalists go underground after 2014 power shift to avoid extermination by Jewish government and some jewish shills took their place to explicitly force Ukraininan-Russian tensions in the country.
Now we see some strange "nazis" who are on the side of Jews and NWO with never known leaders and complete absence of any nationalistic ideology. That is not Ukrainian nazis at all, it is some NWO military units.
Hardly that things will be heard even here, and hardly they are important, but that is just another proof that all that Russian-Ukrainian tensions are completely staged and nearly everything is a lie, even in such small details.
The stage is bigger...neither do Ukrainians control Ukraine; nor do Russians control Russia. Nation implies "a people"; yet all suggested nations are controlled by the same international parasites.
International doesn't just represent on international scale (rootless); but internal-national aka "extending toward the interior" (spreading among the rooted).
The issue is the labeling of nations; which deceives the people (the real nation) to ignore responding as individual ones (choice) to collective all (balance). The label "nation" is being suggested by the choice of the few and consented to by the choice of the many; which represents choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; in ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
The sleight of hand "African-American" should've opened the eyes of ignorance towards the nation racket; yet even a contradiction as big as two continents within the same person is being willingly ignored.
Exactly. As in any other country.
There is a war, not that fake TV wars they stage and show us, but a war between people and parasites. Only one thing is on our side - they need us in one form or another, but people does not need parasites at all. We could kill them all without any consequences, but they can't genocide all of us.
As consenting choice to their suggestions. Us falling for their suggestions is what destroys us; which is what they racketeer.
How would a host learn to overcome a weakness (ignorance) without attracting parasites exploiting it (suggestion)? Also; the ignorance of the many is what causes the insolence of the few.
It's consent to suggestion (want) while ignoring perception (need); which causes the conflict (want vs not want). Us vs them; host vs parasite; killing vs genocide etc. are all rebranded names for the same conflict.
As choice we are not within conflict; but within balance (need/want aka perception/suggestion). The majority of our species ignores perceived balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want); which a) represents the temptation of ignorance and b) represents the weakness of the host that attracts the parasitic exploitation thereof.
Take suggested pornography for example...killing the so called jews peddling that smut doesn't address the weakness within the consenting many whatsoever. Furthermore; the so called jew label is used as a liability shield to promote a boogeymen to the many as to allow them to keep shirking responsibility over self towards blaming others.
Why isn't the responsibility of each one to choose need (self sustenance of life) over want (temptation luring towards death) mentioned while reasoning about all these conflicts? What about alcohol? Same modus operandi by the few; same ignorance by the many; who predominantly consent to genocide by mass distribution of alcohol.
Choice represents the center of a balance based system, and the many choose to ignore this. Why wouldn't the few exploit this?