Question a) if the parasitic few deliberately suggest information to fill up the memory of the many and b) if memory (mind) needs to be used like a ram (temporary storage of information for constant adaptation to perceived inspiration; instead of like a hard-drive (accumulation of suggested information until capacity; while self restricting perceived inspiration)?
Intelligence
What if there's a difference between growing comprehension by adapting to perceived inspiration, and consenting to understand (stand under) the suggested information by others?
we already hear every day
What if form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents temporary resistance (form) within ongoing velocity (flow), and therefore repeated choice of adaptation by resistance to velocity turns out to be the frequency needed to grow resistance within velocity?
What if the need to grow comprehension allows access to infinite perceivable inspiration; while the want for shortcuts corrupts the temporary status of those perceiving?
To choose want over need corrupts the resistance of life being moved from inception towards death, and less temporary resistance within ongoing movement implies a quicker access to outcome (death).
"free" will of choice represents the response to the "dom"inance of balance (free-dom) aka choice (sub) to balance (dom).
Perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) represents natural law; while choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) represents contract law in ignorance of natural law; also referred to as religion (from religio - to bind anew).
The only ones laughing their asses off are the ones you consent to submit your free will to. Question that.
Question a) if the parasitic few deliberately suggest information to fill up the memory of the many and b) if memory (mind) needs to be used like a ram (temporary storage of information for constant adaptation to perceived inspiration; instead of like a hard-drive (accumulation of suggested information until capacity; while self restricting perceived inspiration)?
What if there's a difference between growing comprehension by adapting to perceived inspiration, and consenting to understand (stand under) the suggested information by others?
What if form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents temporary resistance (form) within ongoing velocity (flow), and therefore repeated choice of adaptation by resistance to velocity turns out to be the frequency needed to grow resistance within velocity?
What if the need to grow comprehension allows access to infinite perceivable inspiration; while the want for shortcuts corrupts the temporary status of those perceiving?
To choose want over need corrupts the resistance of life being moved from inception towards death, and less temporary resistance within ongoing movement implies a quicker access to outcome (death).
subscribe lmao
"free" will of choice represents the response to the "dom"inance of balance (free-dom) aka choice (sub) to balance (dom).
Perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) represents natural law; while choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) represents contract law in ignorance of natural law; also referred to as religion (from religio - to bind anew).
The only ones laughing their asses off are the ones you consent to submit your free will to. Question that.