the final redpill
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) makes perceived inspiration from the "current" of ongoing movement the source of everything. The responding choice between perceived inspiration (need) or suggested information (want) represents the responsibility for the EVENT; noun - [Latin eventus, evenio; e and venio, to come] - "the consequence of anything"
In short...perceived inspiration is what comes in; responding choice is responsible for what comes through. The parasitic few suggest information (north; east; west; south aka news-coverage) to deceive the consenting many to ignore perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information).
The internet represents the world wide web of suggested information; also referred to as Plato's Allegory of the Cave. As long as the many consent to be within it (suggested information); so long will the few have control over the ignored outside (perceived inspiration)...simply by resisting the temptation to ignore perceived reality for suggested fiction.
The "internal net" represents each ones comprehension of all perceived inspiration; which requires resisting the temptation of suggested information from others. The growth of comprehension represents ones potential within all perceived potentiality aka the seed of one expressing itself within the soil of all; hence RACE, noun - "radix; radius; radiate; ray; root; generation".
Also; racists implies the suggestion of racism aka choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; in ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law. All -isms are suggested by the parasitic few to trick the ignorant many into consenting to division among each other aka the conflict of reason (want vs not want).
Choice does not need to consent to the suggested conflict of agreement vs disagreement among suggested choices (want vs not want); it needs to respond to perceived balance (need/want).
why do you speak in riddles? Speak simply to be understood instead of to sound smart. Any editor would fire you as a writer.
riddle riddle, whats your middle?
: P
The manipulation going on in this world operates between inspiration and information. The former is being perceived from this system; the latter is being suggested by those within the system.
The many are deceived by the few to ignore perceived reality (inspiration) for suggested fiction (information). What others perceive as a riddle; as nonsense; as word-salad; as a bot etc. represents me taking apart the rules of suggested information; which makes it harder for their ignorance to hide behind information (idolized meaning).
It's your want for understanding that allows others to add complexity (information) over the simplicity perceived (inspiration). Example...the suggestion of "insane person" likely sounds simple to you; yet when I point out that "in-sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos "(by sound) imply us being within and by the source of perceived sound...then you would likely call this complex.
The issue is within your comprehension of perceived reality, and the parasitic few use suggested fiction such as "insane person" to deceive you to consent to ignore the perceived reality of being "within and by" sound; hence the response to sound aka choice of need (resonance) or choice of want (dissonance).
While I'm at want and need...growing comprehension of perceived requires choice of need; while understanding suggested requires choice of want; while ignoring need. Understanding implies "standing under" those who suggest information to you, hence your submission to their free will of choice; when consenting to suggested information.
In short...one cannot comprehend the perceived reality by trying to understand the suggested fiction by others. Comprehension needs to be grown by yourself; instead of wanted from others.
Same with self discernment...can you explain in one word each who; where; what and why you are? That would imply having self discernment.
I edit my writing; while using others as the expression of inspiration, out of which I grow my comprehension. I resist the temptation want to write for others or what others want me to write about. Why? Because otherwise I would consent to a want versus not want conflict (reason); while ignoring need (self sustenance).
you're a mole with the intention to turn others off. or you have schizophrenia or some other mental disability.
Off what? Consenting to suggested pills (red; blue; black or any other crude oil based barbiturates from the pharma cartel)?
Who suggested you that diagnosis? Could it be from the so called jewish psychology monopoly? What if consent to suggested information is what represents mental disability aka memory self restriction towards perceived inspiration?
Aka "one who works in darkness". Well; if the ignorance of others represents darkness; then me poking holes into it to make it harder to ignore enlightenment (through adaptation to the source of light); then mole fits... https://pic8.co/sh/KALPWD.jpg
get off the meds
MED'ICINE, noun [Latin medicina, from medeor, to cure] - "any substance, liquid or solid, that has the property of curing or mitigating disease in animals" aka the cure for Human (Heb; form) represents adaptation to Animal (animation aka flow).
The cure of form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents free will of choice responding to the dominance of balance (momentum). Getting off momentum (balance) implies ignorance (imbalance).