Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

14
()
posted 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 +15 / -1
15 comments share
15 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– KiloRomeo 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I also don't think they're after a prolonged engagement. It's a series of actions with specific aims. Remember Kazakhstan a few months ago?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Ep0ch 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

No it is 100%.

A) They have had months amassing

B) They're going to occupy after invasion, and root any major resistance.

C) In doing so they have to install a new command structure. Or a favourable one.

Your comparison is an existing command against a peasant revolt. Not against a standing army.

In this situation as a comparison, if they cannot effectively enter. It's a case of Aleppo. Because that enemy is using shields and retreating back into Urban centers where it has production and cover. This piece, a human shield. The men now the women. Protecting a command structure where it is rostering them. Largely to cause outcry as sanctions bite and outrage draws World opinion. It protects any other advance. But sooner they'll likely close the border completely and cut off coms.

But you're right who knows fully what that objective is. But it is faster getting full on. Men women are rostered.

Again I don't have to reiterate. I take no side. I am not fighting here. As an overview, discussion, I can only draw on comparison with what seems logical or obvious.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– KiloRomeo 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I think Russia only has money to occupy for a few months. Kazakhstan to new shows they prefer to get in and out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Kazakhstan is very different. Completely different. Largely a closed country. Different politics. It flared probably exploited but a larger protest. Geopolitically Russian position and its allies a competitor alliance to Nato of former satellites sends in peacekeepers.

Russian problem is averting the image of becoming Soviet again. What do any alligned satellites do? They pick sides and possibly unalign. Citizens could even coup.

With Ukraine, due to a huge history not worth getting into, take far too long. But Crimea isn't going anywhere else. It frankly is absurd to even suggest America gives Hawaii back too. They don't even want too. But by geography it dominates Ukrainian coastline. The more Western Ukraine becomes the more threat to Russian Crimea it becomes. It might as well be what it is now because tomorrow it would be. Accidental war was sooner unavoidable, it redefines the borders. Instead of openly engaging until an accident causes it. It isn't only Crimea. Much of Eastern Ukraine is also of Russian origins.

But now once the bear awakes. It doesn't hibernate until its had its fill.

Who knows that full agenda.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– KiloRomeo 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Hawaii asked us to intervene to keep the peace. They recognize they couldn't self govern. Now they have full representation. I'm not seeing the parallel.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– PenisBanana 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I think Russia only has money to occupy for a few months.

With oil at $110 a barrel. FFS.

Yes, that IS the current propaganda, but does that mean that you "think" that? Unfortunately, yes. Yes it does.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy