New 9/11 footage
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
I wouldn't exactly call it propaganda? But let that rest for now.
I'm not gonna say I'm a 'no planer', because I wasn't there so I can't really tell for sure. But have you ever seen an elongated object crash into something stationary? I'm gonna assume yes. Now, when those to objects collide, there's this phenomenon called "physical deformation". And, since we know that steel and concrete beats a lightweight material like aluminum, the deformation would be expected on the object of least physical strength ie the plane.
Can you find me footage of said phenomena in ANY of the footage from that day?
Because I couldn't.
It's 100% dis-info propaganda. There are actual legitimate questions about what hit the pentagon, since it was only captured by 3 video cameras (gas station, and the 2 security cameras) and neither really show a plane. But the WTC buildings, literally every pair of eye balls and camera was pointed in the location of those buildings. If it was simply bombs, there would be countless video footage of no planes. But there isn't, it defies all logic and reason. But someone has gone to great lengths to inject these deliberate bad ideas into the 9/11 debate, and what it does is discredit legitimate questions and problems with the narrative by attaching deliberately insane or stupid ideas to them.
Find me footage of physical deformation occuring on the planes, before they vanish into the buildings.
ANY footage will do.
Good luck.
I can do one better. Here is what a plane crash into a wall looks like https://youtu.be/F4CX-9lkRMQ It basically just disappears into the wall.
Lol, you're comparing two very different things and didn't find what I requested (it's a rigged game, I know - because it doesn't exist.... :) ).
Yeah, I've seen this footage being referenced before and do you honestly think an F4 shares the same mechanical attributes of a 737?
Now, I'm no pilot, but it seems to me that a much smaller fighter jet would have an easier time operating at high speeds and low altitudes than a fully loaded 737.
Not only that, but aren't large passenger planes somewhat limited, because of their size, in below 10000 ft because of different atompspheric conditions? I believe it's about 287 mph, ie much slower than that controlled experiment you brought up.