The trick is that it represents a contradiction in terms the majority lacks comprehension of...
a) free-dom implies "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance; hence the status quo of existing.
b) speech implies suggested word in ignorance of perceived sound; hence a choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which is in ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
In short...everyone exists as free (choice) within dom (balance); yet consent to use of speech implies ignoring perceived source (balance) for suggestions by others (choice).
Maybe a little simpler...those who want freedom of speech ignore that "nigger; kike; hitler did nothing wrong" requires free will of choice; which everyone has; yet ignores for wanting freedom to use it from others.
If one comprehends this; then how about questioning why one can shape words by choice; yet somehow requires the choice of others to share the shaped words?
Comprehending that may then allow one to question if suggestible words are shaped out of perceived sound, and if maybe others exploit suggestion of words (fiction) to corrupt comprehension of perceived sound (reality)?
The trick is that it represents a contradiction in terms the majority lacks comprehension of...
a) free-dom implies "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance; hence the status quo of existing.
b) speech implies suggested word in ignorance of perceived sound; hence a choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which is in ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
In short...everyone exists as free (choice) within dom (balance); yet consent to use of speech implies ignoring perceived source (balance) for suggestions by others (choice).
Maybe a little simpler...those who want freedom of speech ignore that "nigger; kike; hitler did nothing wrong" requires free will of choice; which everyone has; yet ignores for wanting freedom to use it from others.
If one comprehends this; then how about questioning why one can shape words by choice; yet somehow requires the choice of others to share the shaped words?
Comprehending that may then allow one to question if suggestible words are shaped out of perceived sound, and if maybe others exploit suggestion of words (fiction) to corrupt comprehension of perceived sound (reality)?