The maintenance of society represents the order following many who consent to the suggestion of SOCI'ETY, noun [Latin societas, from socius, a companion.] - "the union of a number of rational beings; or a number of persons united" aka consent to coming together.
Ones consenting to come together with other ones represents the inversion of our reality; where all perceived (flow) self segregates into individual ones (form). Each of us represents one choice within all balance, and we cannot share choice without ignoring that everything one does represents a choice based response within balance.
This is where "United Nations" comes in...U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". Not unity as suggested (coming together); but unity as being one within all. Nation also implies "a people"; not the suggested brand for nations. No nation is controlled by its people; because the people are tricked to consent to the suggested name over the perceived state of themselves sustaining their habitat by choice.
In short...the many live as choice in a balanced system; yet are being tempted by the few to consent to ignore perceived balance for suggested imbalance. Balance will always destroy whatever imbalance we shape within; yet if we hold onto the imbalance, we are being destroyed with it; which the few are hiding under suggested narratives (his-story; wars; dark ages; resets; fall of civilizations; famines; genocides; shuffling the board with miscegenation etc.)
All suggested towards the many to keep them united in consent to a suggested narrative; instead responding as the one within the oneness of all.
The maintenance of society represents the order following many who consent to the suggestion of SOCI'ETY, noun [Latin societas, from socius, a companion.] - "the union of a number of rational beings; or a number of persons united" aka consent to coming together.
Ones consenting to come together with other ones represents the inversion of our reality; where all perceived (flow) self segregates into individual ones (form). Each of us represents one choice within all balance, and we cannot share choice without ignoring that everything one does represents a choice based response within balance.
This is where "United Nations" comes in...U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". Not unity as suggested (coming together); but unity as being one within all. Nation also implies "a people"; not the suggested brand for nations. No nation is controlled by its people; because the people are tricked to consent to the suggested name over the perceived state of themselves sustaining their habitat by choice.
In short...the many live as choice in a balanced system; yet are being tempted by the few to consent to ignore perceived balance for suggested imbalance. Balance will always destroy whatever imbalance we shape within; yet if we hold onto the imbalance, we are being destroyed with it; which the few are hiding under suggested narratives (his-story; wars; dark ages; resets; fall of civilizations; famines; genocides; shuffling the board with miscegenation etc.)
All suggested towards the many to keep them united in consent to a suggested narrative; instead responding as the one within the oneness of all.
FUCK OFF you fucking boring bot. Fuck the fuck off.
What if preoccupation with temptation causes perception of boredom?