Basic assumption: Elites are parsites. Proof: They absolutely can't exist without their host - people. From the other side, human being could perfectly exist without them. Unlike symbiotes, parasites don't provide any profit for host. Elites does not provide anything useful, only do harm to the people. So, elites are parasites per se. This gives us a stone solid basic point and a lot of clues.
Parasites are dumb, they don't need to develop any complex consciousness to feed from the host. Parasites need nutrition from the host. Parasites have some mechanism to replicate in hosts. Parasites use hosts as protection. And so on. You see? A lot of new things to study and look for vulnerabilities.
It could be very hard to kill a parasite without killing a host. Usually this achieved using antiparasitic drugs. (there exist other ways of killing parasites, but let's leave them for another round) Yep, we just need some kind of ivermectin for elites. (Isn't that the unconcious reason they so hate that ivermectin?)
Antiparasitic drugs works either by directly intrfering with parasite vital organs, or by depriving parasite from food. (If you know other princilpes - share it with class).
To choose antiparasitic drug we have to determine parasite vital organs and their nutrition. This will allow us to choose most effective vector of attack for out antiparasitic drug.
What could be elite food necessary for their existence?
Of course it is real food provided by people, we could try to find highly elite-specific food to poison it without harm for host.
It could be wealth too. Not only physical wealth, but also wealth in form of credibility among hosts, trust from other parasites, etc.
Also it could be host compliance, submission, obedience, whatever, you got it.
What could be elites vital organs?
Obviously MSM, bank system, governments, entertainment industry, NGOs, all that stuff. Elites could not survive without that organs.
How they replicate, what is their eggs or larvas and how they get into hosts?
Seems that it is MSM, education system and all around that seeds parasites eggs into hosts. Need to take a closer look to that stuff strictly from the point of parasite reproduction.
And so on.
If we really want to finally get rid of parasites, we inevitable had to find a decent vector or vectors of attack. To find it, we have to focus on the things that are common for all that parasites and don't take in mind some individual for separate parasite things. There is little sense of getting rid of single helminth.
We have to get rid of parasites. Parasites are dumb, if you do not fight them, they always kill the host, even if it will result in parasite own death.
There are no parasites humans could not beat after coldminded pure scientific take. That parasites named "elites" are no different, we just never take them as who they really are, that is the problem. We spent too many time discussing which parasite specimen is worse or what that specimen did. May be it is time to drop all that shit and began to solve the problem in whole?
Let's begin our scientific study. Let's set up our experiments. Let's touch and disturb different parts of parasites, observe reaction, find regularities, weaknesses, connections, etc. #BurnTheBrige is nice such experiment - MSM disturbed, parasite began to budge, it's definitely worth attention - how it budge, what is the ties between parts of it, etc. It is important not only to just try burn that bridge, I think it is much more inportant to track the results of that probe impact.
a) from French élite - "selection, choice". If the many ignore their own choice; then the few become the chosen ones.
b) parasites represent the response to a weakness within the host. The weakness for choice within balance (need/want) represents the choice to ignore need (responsibility) for want (temptation).
Because existence implies being within balance as the responding choice. So choosing ignorance (want over need) tempts the response of those who exploit ignorance by suggesting wants (temptations).
PEOPLE, noun [Latin populus.] - "the body of persons". A person (per sonos aka by sound) represents ones choice based response to all perceived sound...resonance (need) or dissonance (want). Consenting to the suggestion of "people" tricks one to follow the suggested orders of other ones; hence forming a chain of command (pyramid scheme). That's the choice of dissonance; based on wanting to unite; while ignoring the need of U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness."
Taking out those who exploit the host weakness of ignorance (choice of want over need); just tempts more efficient parasites. Instead one needs to utilize the ongoing parasitic exploitation as inspiration to shape ones own self sustenance by taking responsibility (choice) over the weakness (temptation of choosing want over need).
How would the ignorant many indulging in their self destructive temptations ever change their choices; without the consequences of imbalance forcing them to adapt to lack of balance?
The issue here is your want to be provided by others; while ignoring that only flow (inception towards death) provides all for each one form (life) within. Everything perceivable can be used; but ignoring it for the suggestion of nothing by others, corrupts ones comprehension of everything perceivable. In other words..."does not" cannot exist within perceivable reality.
You are tricked to believe in suggested "nothingness". Read the "neverending story" (flow) and its antagonist "the nothing" (ignorance by form).
The few suggest porn; the many consent by masturbating themselves into extinction. Who does the harm? Would taking porn away inspire the many to question the weakness for temptation? What about alcohol? This self destructive vice is so protected by mass ignorance that rothschild can literally put their name on the label; while mass distributing liquid death to those willing to drown themselves in it.
How about "the root of all evil" (money)? No other life-form uses it; the majority exists under the poverty line; and the so called rich don't use money...whose at fault for ignoring that the highest value in existence represents evaluation (choice); which represents the response to all perceived value (balance)? The parasitic few simply suggest a substitute value so that the ignorant many can shirk responsibility of evaluation by choice to them; while devaluating themselves in the process.
The chosen ones represent the response to the many who ignore their free will of choice, and the ignorance of the many tempts the insolence of the few. Per se (by itself) originates in energy (the oneness of all existence); which implies self sustenance, and therefore the parasitic response to mass ignorance sustains self sustenance (balance) by forcing imbalance onto the many until they choose to take responsibility over choice. It will happen; but it can only happen one after another. One cannot share free will of choice with others; only the consequences of making choices in response to all perceived are shared.
All energy is offered to each one within; so if the many choose to ignore it; then the few who withstand ignorance can wield it over the many. Energy harvesting.
You have it embedded into this sentence...mechan-ism aka choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which represents the inversion of perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
The mechanic one needs to respond to represents perceived inspiration (need); while the parasitic mechanism represents suggested information (want)...your choice.
Choosing to consent to any suggestion implies wanting or not wanting it. Whatever side one chooses will put one against the other side; which is called the conflict of reason (want vs not want). The few therefore utilize suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many; which a) keeps the many busy reasoning against each other and b) protects the suggesting few under the reasoning over the suggested.
Example...the few suggest abortion; the many consent to want (pro-choice) vs not want (pro-life) the suggested; which so far kept the abortion racket protected for over half a century. The many are so ignorant that they don't even comprehend that "life equals choice"; while engaging by choice within a pro-life vs pro-choice conflict. Same with all the protests in the world aka PROTEST', verb intransitive [Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it.] - "to affirm with solemnity".
The few suggest want (temptation); the vulnerability represents the choice to resist suggested want for perceived need and everyone already has it; yet chooses to ignore utilizing it. The trick the few use to deceive the many from noticing need; is simply to direct them at what they "not want"; hence herding their cattle within the pasture of reason (something; something...georgia guidstones...age of reason).
The hard part isn't the temptation to kill others (not want); but the struggle to resist temptations (want) while sustaining self (need).
There ya go again...the want to reduce symptoms with suggested barbiturates; while ignoring the perceived cause. Learn from the Muslims...fasting to starve parasites aka choice of reduced intake; while resisting temptation; instead of extra intake of poison for the parasites within you.
Mass ignorance towards perceived reality (inspiration); which represents the soil to grow the seed of suggested fiction (information). Fiction sprouts like "nothing" else within ignored reality...
The ignorant many who willingly operate civilization (domestication of free will) for them; while destroying themselves by chasing suggested outcomes (wealth; goals; winning; power; prestige; lust; vanity; hope; fear; achievements; trophies; entertainment; education; validation; confirmation; order out of chaos; leaders to follow; responsibilities to shirk; absolution of sins; enlightenment; gibs me dats; endless information; life after death; purpose; a way out; escapism; pussy and so on).
Need over want; perceived inspiration over suggested information, and implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want). It's all it takes; but it's a struggle that one can only choose for the sustenance of self...not for others. If one does; then the consequences will benefit all others.