In Russia, in 2000s was one interesting initiative to add and article in Constitution about elected authorities liability to the voters. Shortly, idea was very simple. At the end of the term, during elections of new president/representative/governor/mayor/whatever, voters also judge the work of previous one. If majority voted that their life become better, the previously elected person get a reward for the good job and could be elected again if want to. If majority voted that nothing changed, then elected person just leave the office or participate in elections again. If majority voted that life become worse, then elected person go to jail for the same time he was in office, with confiscation of all assets gained during last term.
At the time, there was possible to change the Constitution only via the referendum. It was allowed to start referendums on any questions if your initiative group collected enough signatures (half million, IIRC) from citizens.
But as soon as above initiative get necessary number of signatures to start referendum, referendums in Russia was nearly prohibited (now we could start referendums only for some insignificant questions, and only after authorisation from authorities), people lost the right to change Constitution (only president or senate could do it), the initiative group and signature collectors was declared "extremist/terrorist organization" and sued, even the idea of elected authorities liability itself was declared extremist, i.e. illegal to share and promote.
So, the attempt to do something really useful in absolutely legal way completely failed in Russia, but proved that Russian authorities explicitly deny any responsibility for anything to the voters.
So, it is interesting, if there any country where authorities really liable before their voters for everything they promise and do after election.
PS: Initiative group was named AVN - Armia Voli Naroda, Army of Will of Nation(People). Interesting, does anybody abroad ever heard anything about one of most supported and most failed political movement of Russia?
"will" represents ONEs free will of choice in response to the balance of ALL. We cannot share will; we are being deceived to ignore this while submitting to the will of others by choice (suggestion) to chocie (consent) contract law; which represents the inversion of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
You talk about "elected representatives"...what is used for both electing and suggestion of electable? Choice. So what representative of choice is one electing? The choice of others...that represents both submission to the choice of others and shirking of response-ability as choice within balance.
The "will" represents ONEs sole authority over self within ALL and each has to wield it by ONEself for the sustenance of self. The government you try to overthrow; replace; vote out etc. represents a mirror of your ignorance towards govern (to control) + ment (from mens; mind). How do the few control the mind of the many? By choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law.
Notice also that the armies of those you try to oppose are all responding as lockstep order followers; hence them submitting to the suggested choices of the few; while ignoring their own free will of choice. You are trying to mimic them by building your own army of followers; but you ignore that the origin of the chain of command (a pyramid scheme) represents exploitation of ignorance through suggestion.
In short...will represents an individual tool; while the parasitic few collectivizing the many who ignore it under the will of the few.
Inception towards death represents the only "way" for all the life in-between; the behavior of this ongoing movement represents the only laws of nature ( [Latin legalis, from lex, legis, law.], and the ONEs (form) within ALL (flow) represent the partial (form) within the absolute (flow).
In other words...natural law is being perceived; while the laws of men are suggested. To choose the latter (want) ignores the former (need) and ignorance of perceived corrupts the comprehension thereof, which is why the many don't get what's going on.
a) the only number that matters within ALL represents ONEself.
b) the signature represents the willing consent to choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law aka the contractual consent to ignore your choice for submission to the choice of others.
Flow (inception towards death) enacts the formed (life) state of being that you bear. You represent the ONE referendum within the constitution of ALL perceived reality. It's the suggested meaning of "constitution and referendum" that tricks you to ignore the perceived meaning thereof.