without digging ive always heard that there is no real evidence jesus actually existed. what if the nwo covered it up and are keeping it secret. in revelations he says something along the lines of i know of those who say they are jews and are not but the synogogue of satan. of course the synagogue of atan would do a cover up job on the coming of christ
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
I think the best evidence is when he healed the blind man twice in Mark. After the man could see he had visual agnosia and needed that also fixed. So why would the authors put that in unless it really happened? If they made it up then to make Jesus appear more divine they wouldn't want to or medically know to record two healings.
They did. He never resurrected in versions of the bible where over a period of around a 100 years competing practices of Christianity fought over the beliefs of the founding print. There is also questions of his disciples, the amount claimed, and the testaments or chapters omitted. Like Thomas and Magdalane. In any event resurrection won, his wife was also omitted, and any original scrolls have been reworded numerously. Monks rewrote on top of the original vellums a few times.
There is also Mithriasm which has a huge resemblance to Christainity. Debates on which is in fact older despite them both sharing the same era. Mithriasm is, but it won't be documented as such.