Don't worry if Russia didn't get the invasion memo. Invade by someday.
I am sure that Klaus will think of something else. How to solve a problem like our health just kill it, and with our energy just pour the gasoline all over it. Creating another scandal to talk nothing else about. Because it will get them protesting, now beat them with a stick.
Wait and see. Promises. They're coming. The Russians are coming. On Wednesday. Darn it.
Ukraine would sooner choose which for the security and stability. So what was the point?
It must be incompetence, because they must have learned from Afghanistan to sound the retreat. Let them sort out their own security, it's obviously guaranteed by cancelling flight and pulling business and creating economic uncertainty. Big win for democracy. The Russians are coming.
2 more weeks....
Outside of the obvious musing. It's practically a certainty something will have to break before it gives.
What are the terms, a presumption of conflict. Any resolution is either reinforce or retreat. Or this scenario plays again.
Edit: Outside of the absurdity. Laughably ironic. But agenda's motion. Not a topic I want to dive into. Clearly nothing is abstract if it's formulated. Although with the going rates of ludicrousity there is only decline, it is causing increasing distrust, uncertainty, and failure. Inevitably forcing resolve. Tell me today, what it means?
Conflict sooner causes closure and potentially also creates far more opportunites. Or it sooner rears. But aren't those stakes a much wider angle playing into far more shenanigans?
Don't worry if Russia didn't get the invasion memo. Invade by someday.
I am sure that Klaus will think of something else. How to solve a problem like our health just kill it, and with our energy just pour the gasoline all over it. Creating another scandal to talk nothing else about. Because it will get them protesting, now beat them with a stick.
No Santa isn't real.
Wait and see. Promises. They're coming. The Russians are coming. On Wednesday. Darn it.
Ukraine would sooner choose which for the security and stability. So what was the point?
It must be incompetence, because they must have learned from Afghanistan to sound the retreat. Let them sort out their own security, it's obviously guaranteed by cancelling flight and pulling business and creating economic uncertainty. Big win for democracy. The Russians are coming.
2 more weeks....
Outside of the obvious musing. It's practically a certainty something will have to break before it gives.
What are the terms, a presumption of conflict. Any resolution is either reinforce or retreat. Or this scenario plays again.
Edit: Outside of the absurdity. Laughably ironic. But agenda's motion. Not a topic I want to dive into. Clearly nothing is abstract if it's formulated. Although with the going rates of ludicrousity there is only decline, it is causing increasing distrust, uncertainty, and failure. Inevitably forcing resolve. Tell me today, what it means?
Conflict sooner causes closure and potentially also creates far more opportunites. Or it sooner rears. But aren't those stakes a much wider angle playing into far more shenanigans?