whats with the weird duality in which they describe him? At one hand hes the literally devil who resides in some flaming under world torturing souls, but then hes described much differently in other places. lucifer morning star the bringer of light? banished to live amongst us as punishment.. cus he was jealous of us?
theres also the weird occult connection with Satanism lucifer sun worship and masonry?
another weird thing is how heaven is described in the book of enoch. when he goes to petition for the Watchers He meets the high holy one (not god mind you, god is AIM) who is a huge being of immense light that sits on a giant crystal throne with rivers of fire and lava flowing from the base. hundreds of thounds of silent worshippers stand around him at all time while lighting and thunder rage above them.. if lucifer had a throne that would be it
anyone got any theory's on this stuff? I'm in uncharted territory here
They suggest a description; you consent by either wanting or not wanting it.
a) this represents choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which ignores balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
b) Either choice of want or not want; will put you into a conflict with all who chose the other side. This conflict (want vs not want) represents the "dualism" suggested to you.
Example: under natural; your choice exists within the left/right balance; so choosing to take a step left implies coming from a right and vice versa. Your ignorance of perceived natural law for suggested contract law allows those suggesting dualism; to put you into a left (democrat) versus right (republican) conflict.
All the conflicts in the world represent want vs not want choices that ignore need, and that are rebranded at will by those making suggestions...true vs false; good vs bad; believer vs non-believer; on vs off; us vs them; min vs max; Christianity vs Islam; pro-life vs pro-choice; feminists vs patriarchy; Coke vs Pepsi; Nintendo vs Sony; communism vs capitalism; nationalism vs internationalism etc. all of these represent want vs not want choices towards the suggestions by the choice of others.
The few suggest "abortion"; the many consent by wanting or not wanting it; either choice confirms the suggestion and gives those suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested meaning at their free will of choice; because those consenting are ignoring theirs when consenting to suggestions by others. The few then rebrand want (pro-choice) vs not want (pro-life); while suggesting that the versus in-between represent "reason; logic", and it is that reasoning that allowed the suggested "abortion" to continue unopposed for over half a century and counting.
Meanwhile; the few put a sleight of hand (notice of liability) out for those with eyes to see (those who resist ignorance)...while the many are stuck within the conflict of reason between pro-life vs pro-choice; they can't comprehend that "life equals choice". Both sides are "alive" while using "choice" to consent to the conflict between life vs choice. This comedy interwoven into drama represents the handiwork of the masons of free will of choice (freemasonry).
All light and dark allegories represent growth of comprehension (light) and ignorance corrupting comprehension (dark). The bringer of light represents inspiration (from within spirit); while the cause of darkness represents information (form within form).
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we represent temporary resistance (growth) within ongoing velocity (loss). What does velocity causes within itself? Momentum aka balance within flow for the responding choice of temporary form within.
Choice represents the response to balance (need/want) aka form balancing within flow; yet the ongoing flow tempts the temporary form to ignore this for the suggestions of other form aka imbalance (want vs not want) through the choice to ignore balance (need/want).
As for inspiration...spirit; from spiro - "to breathe" aka forms adaptation to flow. Ones senses perceiving movement represents communicated inspiration (from within spirit); others suggesting us what it means represents information (from within form). Form represents the resistance to the velocity of flow; which one ignores when falling for the temptation of other form.
In short...self sustenance of life implies choice of need over want; ignorance thereof as the temptation towards death implies choice of want over need. The parasitc few exploit the ignorance of the many as the happy merchants of temptation (want over need).
The -ism implies a) contract law between choice (suggestion) and choice (consenting) and b) suggested information; while ignoring perceived inspiration. Your consent to suggested information is what allows those suggesting it to withhold it from you aka to hide it aka to conceal it aka OCCULT', adjective [Latin occultus, occulo; ob and celo, to conceal.]
The consenting many are falling for the "spell-craft" of the suggesting few. Before the suggested word comes the perceived sound. The few suggest "insane person"; the consenting many ignore the perceived "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound).
As for SA'TAN, noun [Heb. an adversary.]...that's allegory for resistance aka forms status quo within the velocity of flow...unless ignored. Choosing to adapt to inspiration (Lucifer) represents resisting (Satan) temptation aka the struggle to sustain self for form (Jesus) within flow (God).
in nomine (in the name of aka contract law) patris (flow) et filii (form) et spiritus sancti (adaptation as form to flow).
a) when velocity (flow) meets resistance (form) it causes friction; vibration; resonance and heat accumulation (sun).
b) all ship allegories represent the ONE vessel (form) within ALL movement (flow) aka you as form within flow; choice within balance; temporary within ongoing; resistance within velocity; magnetic within electric; potential within potentiality; growth within loss; ONE within ALL.
c) Sun; Son; ONE. The few don't worship the sun; among the many who ignore to be the ones with the choice; the few represent the "chosen ones".
PETI'TION, noun [Latin petitio, from peto, to ask, properly to urge or press.] aka perceiving (watcher) form responding by resistance (petition) to incoming flow in exchange for comprehensible information out of perceived inspiration.
As ONE (form) within ALL (flow)...ALL (flow/from) represents ONE (in energy) aka the ONEness of ALL. Those within perceived (form) can "meet" what causes the perceived (flow) by comprehending it. Comprehension represents temporary growth with the ongoing loss of perceived inspiration. HO'LY, adjective - "whole, entire" represents ALL (potentiality) from the perspective of ONE (potential).
To be (ONE) implies out of (ALL) aka one thing (form) out of everything (flow) aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life), form to flow (death) aka ONEs transmutation out of ALL. The source of light implies flow meeting form within momentum.
Flow causing balance (momentum) represents the source of sound; form represents the choice of response to sound aka need (resonance) or want (dissonance). We don't make sound; we respond to sound by shaping out of perceived sound aka transmutation out of base (alchemy); which is why each one represents a silent vessel (form) within motion (flow). We're a noisy bunch tho.
Sleight of hand:
"Hello, darkness, my old friend" (ignorance)
"I've come to talk with you again" (temptation)
"Because a vision softly creeping" (suggestion)
"Left its seeds while I was sleeping" (corruption)
"And the vision that was planted in my brain" (information)
"Still remains...within the sound of silence" (inspiration)
Aka ONEs lack of comprehension towards ALL perceived; causes by falling for the temptations of other ONEs.
a) adaptation to perceived inspiration represents ones growth of comprehension (compressed into one); while consenting to suggested information represents understanding thereof (standing under another one).
b) try utilizing need over want; perceived inspiration over suggested information and implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want).
c) no other can offer you comprehension; you can only grow it by your own choice. Believing what I write; does not represent comprehending what you perceive.