I'd vote for the jew who at least says the right things rather than the cuck who has already been a big proponent of medical tyranny.

That implies choosing between wanting vs not wanting the suggestions by others; what if choice represents the response to perceived balance (need/want); while the suggested choices by others are tempting one to ignore need for want; hence causing the imbalance (want vs not want) by ignoring balance (need/want).

you have two...It can't be avoided.

You are ONE; your free will of choice to count the suggestions of others is what causes the "two". A "two" does not represent a perceivable state within nature; but the choice of those within to ignore being ONE within ALL; which thereby also ignores the ONEness of ALL.

Duverger's Law

• LAW, noun [Latin lex; from the root of lay; a law is that which is laid, set or fixed.] - "an established or permanent rule".

As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) only the movement is ongoing; while everything within is temporary. So how can one form (Duverger) within all flow define a permanent rule for all other form? Could it be the choice of the many to ignore perceived natural law for suggested laws of men; which in return allows the few to rule the many at free will of choice; by simply resisting the temptation to ignore representing a choice?