A disease so deadly
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Or the tests are 90%+ unreliable. Has logic died?
the inventor of the PCR test said it's not a diagnostic tool and that you can find anything with enough cycles. a positive result at 35 cycles means there's much less viral material than a positive result at 15 cycles, because each cycle effectively amplifies the test, and they had to amplify it many more times.
it's why jabbed people have a higher standard for cases. if you test positive at 40 cycles and are unjabbed, even if you have no symptoms, you're a case. if you get hit by a car and die while walking out of the grocery story, and your corpse tests positive at 100 cycles, you're a covid death.
but if you're jabbed, then you are not counted as a covid case unless you're hospitalized, dead, or test positive at under 28 cycles. at first they called these "breakthrough cases", and now they occasionally say the word "breakthrough", but they do not count any cases in jabbed people in the US unless it meets this higher standard.
but even worse, apparently multiple countries, including some states in the US, have been pulling this shit where if you say you're jabbed, and the name on your jab record doesn't exactly match your medical records, they will count you as unvaccinated anyways. so, if your jab card says "Blood Reign" or "Blood Shall Reign" but your medical record says "Blood S Reign", they will count you as unjabbed.
The other issue is they aren't even testing for a whole virus. They are literally testing for just fragments of DNA or RNA. That means theoretically they could test positive when sick with other similar diseases.