Van Allen said it, that even a fast crossing in the radiation belts would be lethal.
No, he did not.
or if they did they fucking died
You know shit. You're uneducated and get your 'facts' from morons who also know shit.
When NASA commenced its lunar spaceflight program, its scientists already knew about the belts and their spatial and energy distribution. Apropos the energies: electrons below about 1 MeV were unlikely to be dangerous, as were protons below 10 MeV. For example, a proton with an energy of 3 MeV could penetrate about 6 mm of aluminium (a typical spacecraft material) whereas one of 100 MeV could penetrate up to 40 mm. So engineers fashioned shielding that consisted of a spacecraft hull and all the instrumentation lining the walls.
Further, knowing the belts’ absence above the poles, the altitude of the lower edge of the inner belt being ~600 km (well above the LEO) and the location of the South Atlantic anomaly, where doses are at a high 40 mrads/day at an altitude of 210 km allowed NASA to design the Apollo translunar injection (TLI) orbit in a way that the spacecraft would avoid the belts’ most dangerous parts.
Apollo 11 bypassed the inner belt and only passed through the weaker part of the outer belt.
Thanks for the reply. I want to believe we went to the moon, but I cannot deny all the fuckery with images and missing tapes and equipment. I’m always up to be persuaded, each option is almost equally as fascinating. Either we did it, or we faked it.
Which everyone that is claimed to be fake has a plausible reason why you are seeing what you are seeing. eg; illuminated astronaut - moon dust is highly reflective, angled shadows, what happens when you have direct undiffused sunlight and no atmosphere, on and on. The conspiracy people think just because it does not look like that on earth, they have no frame of reference. Of course things look different. No stars? Yeah, dim wit, that what happens when you have no atmosphere and super glare from the surface of the moon.
Hey, I’m not angry or bitter one way or another. Like I said I can be persuaded and love to see the facts of each side. Thanks for the well explained reply - it’s fun to think about regardless for sure. I’ve been watching this old documentary that says around 1967 NASA realized they couldn’t ever put a man on the moon before 1970, so they used all their equipment and simulation stuff to fake it. But how can you explain the astronauts acting like complete dickheads on the moon? Jumping and falling and hitting their helmet on rocks n shit, very possibly tearing a hole in any part of their suit. Why would they be fucking around like they’re in a bounce house. I know gravity is different but Jesus Christ it’s like they’re retarded and don’t know the smallest tear can literally give them the worst death imaginable but they’re cracking jokes and acting like 5 year olds. I can understand some countries doing a water simulation and call it a space walk, I’ve seen videos of bubbles floating while they’re supposedly in space. That doesn’t mean we didn’t go to the moon, but why even be shady about it and fake that even? There’s definitely shady shit - I include losing the tapes and re-recording over important data shady as well
No, he did not.
You know shit. You're uneducated and get your 'facts' from morons who also know shit.
When NASA commenced its lunar spaceflight program, its scientists already knew about the belts and their spatial and energy distribution. Apropos the energies: electrons below about 1 MeV were unlikely to be dangerous, as were protons below 10 MeV. For example, a proton with an energy of 3 MeV could penetrate about 6 mm of aluminium (a typical spacecraft material) whereas one of 100 MeV could penetrate up to 40 mm. So engineers fashioned shielding that consisted of a spacecraft hull and all the instrumentation lining the walls.
Further, knowing the belts’ absence above the poles, the altitude of the lower edge of the inner belt being ~600 km (well above the LEO) and the location of the South Atlantic anomaly, where doses are at a high 40 mrads/day at an altitude of 210 km allowed NASA to design the Apollo translunar injection (TLI) orbit in a way that the spacecraft would avoid the belts’ most dangerous parts.
Apollo 11 bypassed the inner belt and only passed through the weaker part of the outer belt.
Thanks for the reply. I want to believe we went to the moon, but I cannot deny all the fuckery with images and missing tapes and equipment. I’m always up to be persuaded, each option is almost equally as fascinating. Either we did it, or we faked it.
Which everyone that is claimed to be fake has a plausible reason why you are seeing what you are seeing. eg; illuminated astronaut - moon dust is highly reflective, angled shadows, what happens when you have direct undiffused sunlight and no atmosphere, on and on. The conspiracy people think just because it does not look like that on earth, they have no frame of reference. Of course things look different. No stars? Yeah, dim wit, that what happens when you have no atmosphere and super glare from the surface of the moon.
Shit happens. This is no evidence of anything.
We did it.
Hey, I’m not angry or bitter one way or another. Like I said I can be persuaded and love to see the facts of each side. Thanks for the well explained reply - it’s fun to think about regardless for sure. I’ve been watching this old documentary that says around 1967 NASA realized they couldn’t ever put a man on the moon before 1970, so they used all their equipment and simulation stuff to fake it. But how can you explain the astronauts acting like complete dickheads on the moon? Jumping and falling and hitting their helmet on rocks n shit, very possibly tearing a hole in any part of their suit. Why would they be fucking around like they’re in a bounce house. I know gravity is different but Jesus Christ it’s like they’re retarded and don’t know the smallest tear can literally give them the worst death imaginable but they’re cracking jokes and acting like 5 year olds. I can understand some countries doing a water simulation and call it a space walk, I’ve seen videos of bubbles floating while they’re supposedly in space. That doesn’t mean we didn’t go to the moon, but why even be shady about it and fake that even? There’s definitely shady shit - I include losing the tapes and re-recording over important data shady as well
lmao sheep
baa