the internet is a fast way to get info, and info moves the mind.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) the mind of form needs to respond to perceived inspiration (from within spirit) yet is tempted to want to respond to suggested information (from within form).
The suggested internet deceives one to ignore the perceived "moving" inspiration communicated to ones senses; for suggested information towards ones choice of consent.
The perceived internal net represents ones comprehension of all perceived inspiration through adaption to it; while resisting the temptation to fall for the suggested information by others.
Question what comes first...perceived sound or suggested words shaped by choice out of perceived sound? Nature communicates itself by moving everything within; which senses perceive as inspiration (from within spirit; from Latin spiro - "to breathe"). Breathing represents form (life) adapting to flow (inception towards death).
Everything suggested implies by the choice of others; hence information (from within form). Every suggested information requires your consent by choice to either want or not want the suggested information. Both want or not want (suggested information) represent the ignorance of need (perceived inspiration).
Before you can choose to want or not want what others suggest; you respond as choice to balance (need/want) under natural law (as defined by flow upon form).
In short...reality communicates itself through movement; not by how others within reality describe it.
I do agree
That's the issue. You judge suggested information (want vs not want aka agreement vs disagreement); while ignoring perceived inspiration. Your free will of choice represents the response to balance (need/want)...not to the suggested choices (want vs not want) by others. Suggestion is parasitic to perception; which is what the few exploit to control the many.
Agreement vs disagreement among choices represents imbalance; hence in ignorance of choice responding to balance (momentum) caused by the natural order (flow) for the responding form within.
leading us to believe
To believe represents to consent by choice to suggestion by choice of others aka submission of free will to the will of others; who then gain the power to define; redefine and contradict whatever suggested one consented to believe.
Choice submitting to choice represents contract law aka RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew]; while the original bond under natural law represents offer (balance) response (choice).
to believe that these seeds are our own thoughts and opinions
The many think in words; because the suggestions of the few domesticated them to consent to it. Suggesting humans to respond to words is called civilizing them; while suggesting dogs to respond to words is called domesticating them. Perceived sound exists before suggested word and the parasitic few comprehend this; which is what allows them to wield all languages as spell-craft against the consenting many.
This is how they can strip natural connotations out (Latin to Pig-Latin aka English); while weaving inverted rhetoric into words; how they can communicate under multiple layers of numerology underneath the spoken languages; how they can hide suggested law systems (maritime admiralty law) underneath other suggested law systems (common law) by use of different meanings (legalese); how politicians can suggest endless fiction; while avoiding to consent to any choice to choice contracts within reality and so on.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) the mind of form needs to respond to perceived inspiration (from within spirit) yet is tempted to want to respond to suggested information (from within form).
The suggested internet deceives one to ignore the perceived "moving" inspiration communicated to ones senses; for suggested information towards ones choice of consent.
The perceived internal net represents ones comprehension of all perceived inspiration through adaption to it; while resisting the temptation to fall for the suggested information by others.
Question what comes first...perceived sound or suggested words shaped by choice out of perceived sound? Nature communicates itself by moving everything within; which senses perceive as inspiration (from within spirit; from Latin spiro - "to breathe"). Breathing represents form (life) adapting to flow (inception towards death).
Everything suggested implies by the choice of others; hence information (from within form). Every suggested information requires your consent by choice to either want or not want the suggested information. Both want or not want (suggested information) represent the ignorance of need (perceived inspiration).
Before you can choose to want or not want what others suggest; you respond as choice to balance (need/want) under natural law (as defined by flow upon form).
In short...reality communicates itself through movement; not by how others within reality describe it.
That's the issue. You judge suggested information (want vs not want aka agreement vs disagreement); while ignoring perceived inspiration. Your free will of choice represents the response to balance (need/want)...not to the suggested choices (want vs not want) by others. Suggestion is parasitic to perception; which is what the few exploit to control the many.
Agreement vs disagreement among choices represents imbalance; hence in ignorance of choice responding to balance (momentum) caused by the natural order (flow) for the responding form within.
To believe represents to consent by choice to suggestion by choice of others aka submission of free will to the will of others; who then gain the power to define; redefine and contradict whatever suggested one consented to believe.
Choice submitting to choice represents contract law aka RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew]; while the original bond under natural law represents offer (balance) response (choice).
The many think in words; because the suggestions of the few domesticated them to consent to it. Suggesting humans to respond to words is called civilizing them; while suggesting dogs to respond to words is called domesticating them. Perceived sound exists before suggested word and the parasitic few comprehend this; which is what allows them to wield all languages as spell-craft against the consenting many.
This is how they can strip natural connotations out (Latin to Pig-Latin aka English); while weaving inverted rhetoric into words; how they can communicate under multiple layers of numerology underneath the spoken languages; how they can hide suggested law systems (maritime admiralty law) underneath other suggested law systems (common law) by use of different meanings (legalese); how politicians can suggest endless fiction; while avoiding to consent to any choice to choice contracts within reality and so on.
This is the way.
Learn to hear and follow your intuition.