Can the few perpetuate genocides by suggesting the many to enact them upon each other; while simultaneously consenting to the suggestion that the few are being targeted by genocides?
Does religion (religio - "to bind anew) represent the industrialization of submission (consent to suggestion); which allows the few to frame the already consenting many with any subsequent suggestion?
Does consenting to any suggestion causes the conflict of reason (want vs not want); which would allow the few to control both sides of every conflict the many are consenting to aka division (reason) by suggestion (-isms)? And could those conflicts be perpetuated indefinitely by simply suggesting contradictions to both sides within every conflict of reason (aka talmudic reasoning)?
Does nature offer "false" information towards perceiving senses? If not; then could the few suggest "true" information; which when consented to by the many (want or not want) allows the few to contradict consented to "true" with "false"; hence allowing them to rebrand the original choice of want vs not want (reason) into for example true vs false; good vs evil; believer vs non-believer; right vs left; capitalism vs communism; patriarchy vs feminism; pro-life vs pro-choice; meat-eater vs vegan; black vs white; nationalism vs internationalism; Sega vs Nintendo; Coffee vs tea; like vs dislike...
Frame religion? Evolution Framed religion, cannot have them listening to God, they might think God told them to do it, they're better off being programmed monkeys. Listen to the science, it has become a belief. God poses a direct threat to any ungodly elites unless you're the pope, because God told him to get a vax passport, it is now needed to congregate.
Falsifying religious genocide nope, quite sure they were devils.
Grow up. You are either really dumb, or you don't understand the irony, which is it? Foreigner? Your impediment is caused by your beliefs and your lack of the language used.
There is no framing religious genocide the other side were heathens, devils, or infidels. Until evolution turned everybody into monkeys. Now they simply comply with another belief system, listen to the science, today it has become baseless, another theory likely to change upon any actual facts. Science a few hundred years ago thought the globe was flat. Today, it manufactures dinosaurs off artistic impressions. Science framed religion to force control. Control today means you're a monkey. Believe in the vax, monkey, it doesn't vax, but it demands your belief that it does. Because it wants to control how you congregate.
Obviously you're a juvenille, and most likely a monkey. You use rhetoric, your username, you don't even understand until you don't make any sense. Because you're a copy and paste glowie.
Who controls religion, God. God is not controlled. It creates the likes of Manson or Hitler. Or Jesus. Therefore science is needed to create monkeys. People who believe in consumption, controlling the narrative of their existence and their beliefs. Science today is a belief. Theory; Do you believe in dinosaurs, or the Big Bang? Until you simply vax, and are sooner controlled. The pope has called for vax passes to enter the Vatican because he's another monkey, or did God tell him? Last time we all checked, God didn't need a passport to worship. But do believe in the science. It extracts control of the narrative for profit.
Let me read this again...
Could you falsify a religion to frame a genocide?
Do you mean what the Christians did to all us "pagans"?
Yes, you can.
More people have died in the name of Christianity than any other religion or war, and yet they're always framing themselves as the victim.
Enlightening rebuttal.
Islam enters chat ...
Must be rough to be a thousand years old.try adulting.
Can the few perpetuate genocides by suggesting the many to enact them upon each other; while simultaneously consenting to the suggestion that the few are being targeted by genocides?
Does religion (religio - "to bind anew) represent the industrialization of submission (consent to suggestion); which allows the few to frame the already consenting many with any subsequent suggestion?
Does consenting to any suggestion causes the conflict of reason (want vs not want); which would allow the few to control both sides of every conflict the many are consenting to aka division (reason) by suggestion (-isms)? And could those conflicts be perpetuated indefinitely by simply suggesting contradictions to both sides within every conflict of reason (aka talmudic reasoning)?
Does nature offer "false" information towards perceiving senses? If not; then could the few suggest "true" information; which when consented to by the many (want or not want) allows the few to contradict consented to "true" with "false"; hence allowing them to rebrand the original choice of want vs not want (reason) into for example true vs false; good vs evil; believer vs non-believer; right vs left; capitalism vs communism; patriarchy vs feminism; pro-life vs pro-choice; meat-eater vs vegan; black vs white; nationalism vs internationalism; Sega vs Nintendo; Coffee vs tea; like vs dislike...
Frame religion? Evolution Framed religion, cannot have them listening to God, they might think God told them to do it, they're better off being programmed monkeys. Listen to the science, it has become a belief. God poses a direct threat to any ungodly elites unless you're the pope, because God told him to get a vax passport, it is now needed to congregate.
Falsifying religious genocide nope, quite sure they were devils.
Grow up. Seriously.
Grow up. You are either really dumb, or you don't understand the irony, which is it? Foreigner? Your impediment is caused by your beliefs and your lack of the language used.
There is no framing religious genocide the other side were heathens, devils, or infidels. Until evolution turned everybody into monkeys. Now they simply comply with another belief system, listen to the science, today it has become baseless, another theory likely to change upon any actual facts. Science a few hundred years ago thought the globe was flat. Today, it manufactures dinosaurs off artistic impressions. Science framed religion to force control. Control today means you're a monkey. Believe in the vax, monkey, it doesn't vax, but it demands your belief that it does. Because it wants to control how you congregate.
T. Room temp iq christcuck.
Obviously you're a juvenille, and most likely a monkey. You use rhetoric, your username, you don't even understand until you don't make any sense. Because you're a copy and paste glowie.
Who controls religion, God. God is not controlled. It creates the likes of Manson or Hitler. Or Jesus. Therefore science is needed to create monkeys. People who believe in consumption, controlling the narrative of their existence and their beliefs. Science today is a belief. Theory; Do you believe in dinosaurs, or the Big Bang? Until you simply vax, and are sooner controlled. The pope has called for vax passes to enter the Vatican because he's another monkey, or did God tell him? Last time we all checked, God didn't need a passport to worship. But do believe in the science. It extracts control of the narrative for profit.