Can the few perpetuate genocides by suggesting the many to enact them upon each other; while simultaneously consenting to the suggestion that the few are being targeted by genocides?

Does religion (religio - "to bind anew) represent the industrialization of submission (consent to suggestion); which allows the few to frame the already consenting many with any subsequent suggestion?

Does consenting to any suggestion causes the conflict of reason (want vs not want); which would allow the few to control both sides of every conflict the many are consenting to aka division (reason) by suggestion (-isms)? And could those conflicts be perpetuated indefinitely by simply suggesting contradictions to both sides within every conflict of reason (aka talmudic reasoning)?

Does nature offer "false" information towards perceiving senses? If not; then could the few suggest "true" information; which when consented to by the many (want or not want) allows the few to contradict consented to "true" with "false"; hence allowing them to rebrand the original choice of want vs not want (reason) into for example true vs false; good vs evil; believer vs non-believer; right vs left; capitalism vs communism; patriarchy vs feminism; pro-life vs pro-choice; meat-eater vs vegan; black vs white; nationalism vs internationalism; Sega vs Nintendo; Coffee vs tea; like vs dislike...