Levels of thinking for humanity
(media.communities.win)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
This is the levels of thinking for humanity, through a conspiracy lens. Inspired by the conspiracy pyramid and iceberg memes. Generally speaking, the lower you go, the higher the level of thinking is required to come to that conclusion or research that subject.
However keep in mind that just because something is lower, that doesn't mean I necessarily think it is true. It is possible that someone who is on a higher level of thinking may come to a false conclusion. There are also true statements that are higher up, however these truths are very obvious and don't require a high level of thinking to realize.
This is obviously based on my own perspective, however I have not explicitly stated which things I think are true and which are false. Although you can probably figure it out with some logic and deductive reasoning. Not to mention my post history if you want to go down that road. These are the levels of thought from my perspective as a conspiracy theorist, that is all. Hope this explanation made sense, enjoy!
This is a great list. You could add fomenkos alternative timeline to that though i guess the “ all history is fake” thing covers it
A recent one that is kinda cool is the mudflood and christs millenial kingdom and the most recent civilization reset, worlds fairs etc
I bet you could zoom out and add more topics to it. Could make an excellent poster,
Thanks. This was removed on R/conspiracy...I think I know why. I've never heard of fomenkos but I have heard about Tartaria which I was hinting at. Not sure what the connection to Christ is. If there was a reset these same people gave us our religions, so I don't know why you would believe in it.
I agree with the tiered approach to classifying conspiracy theories. I had a similar thought a while ago. But my reasoning was different: You could classify conspiracy theories on the basis of how much you are willing to believe.
For example, someone who requires rigorous evidence in order to believe something would only believe a very few things (eg: the most extreme being a mathematician within his field of study). On the bottom, you'd have people willing to believe things without a shred of evidence. Conspiracy theorists tend towards the latter - I don't mean that in a bad way. They tend to be intuitive, and their intuition fills the gaps where data is missing. If we all waited for rigorous evidence, we'd all be asleep concerning the NWO takeover attempt.
We cannot see monkeys turning into humans. That is the lie. The evidence for flat earth is overwhelming when you get into it. Stars and seasons actually make no sense on the globe model. For example we see the same constellations year after year, which makes perfect sense if the stars are rotating around the earth. This makes no sense if the earth is flying through space as it is in the heliocentric model. The different climates of the arctic and antarctic make no sense on a globe, they should be much more similar. I don't know why you think you saw curvature. Maybe it's because it's what you were expecting to see. Maybe the shape of the window made it appear curved. I have been in planes and have never seen it. There is even high altitude balloon footage that shows a perfectly flat horizon.
There are so many proofs. No detectable motion, being able to bring boats and other objects back into view that should have disappeared over the horizon. The sun is clearly local and moves across the earth. You can tell by watching a time lapse of a sunset and zooming in on it. Why does Nasa gives us cgi photos of the earth? Water always remains level and the oceans sticking to the globe is impossible without gravity, which cannot be demonstrated or proven, or verified.
I have heard that the windows are fish eyed. Have you sky dived and seen the curve?
Suggested his-story ignores ONE representing the expressed narrative of ALL. A lie represents the suggested contradiction of what others consented to believe to be a truth.
Inspiration is freely perceived; information is being suggested; which allows those who suggest it to withhold it from those who consent to it. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) it is the velocity of flow that advances and destroys all the form within; especially the form that ignores to resist the velocity of flow. To civilize each other through suggestion represents the domestication of free will into the submission to the free will of others.
As ONE (form) within ALL (flow) it is implied that ALL is ONE in energy aka the ONEness of ALL aka the ONE world system for the ONEs within ALL. What controls (govern) mind (from mens; ment)? Balance (flow) and responding choice (form)...unless ignored for the suggested choices of others.
The few represent the parasitic response to the ignorance of the many. If each of the many ignore to respond to the balance of ALL as the ONE with the free will of choice; then the response will be a few CHOSEN ONEs who resist the temptation to ignore their free will of choice. Control over free will implies consenting by free will to suggestion by free will of others. The ignorance of the many tempts the insolence of the few.
The many consent to look at what the few suggest them to mimic. The "path" of the "psych" (Greek psykhē "breath, spirit, soul") implies being form (life) adapting to being moved by flow (inception towards death). Meanwhile...PSYCH - "to outsmart" + "make a bid (suggestion) meant to deceive an opponent."
One represents "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom. Being subjected to the will of others (slave) implies consent by free will to suggestion by free will of others. Those who identify as slaves consent to not want to use their response ability of choice within balance.
Creationism represents a suggested belief system and implies "creation out of nothing" aka one creator who made all. This ignores perceived transmutation; which implies ONEs transmutation out of base ALL (energy) aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death). One cannot perceive creation (new out of nothing); one perceives transmutation (shaped out of everything). Perception itself represents input of ALL things perceivable into each ONE thing consciously receiving perceivable input.
Hate vs love represents the suggested rebranding of want vs not want (imbalance); which implies ignorance as choice towards responding to need (balance).
Everyone starts on level 1. At some point, they drop lower.
It took me 7-8 years to go from Level 1 -> Level 6 (bottom of the iceberg). Minus the part about moon landings, simply because I've never looked into it.
I think flat earth theory is used by 3 letter agencies to discredit any forum they can't control. So the forum looks full of crazy people and scares away new comers. There might be some people who truly believe the earth is flat, but allowing it to go unchallenged is bad for the forum.
There is definitely some controlled opposition like the Flat Earth Society and maybe a few others. However there are genuine flat earthers who make good arguments. The moon landing hoax is a stepping stone to flat earth, so you should probably start with the former before exploring the ladder. I would recommend "American Moon", you can find it on Bitchute.
BRAVO!
As above so below.