Serious Q: If the earth is flat, did it form naturally or by the hand of God?
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
But what if that ball were much larger than you currently understand? Do you describe the flat space currently under your feet as being a ball? Or is that small patch of earth flat?
What is Earth? What does it mean to be flat? What is the arctic circle? What is the black sun? Why isn't our star map an inverted globe? Why can we see the same stars when the nights sky faces four different directions during the four seasons? How do you know you are going straight if you are relying on magnetic north to circumnavigate the globe?
But, it isn't. We know exactly what the dimensions are.
No credible evidence supports this theory.
A round planet,
the opposite of round.
It marks the southern limit of the area within which, for one day or more each year, the Sun does not set
IDK, a Nazi symbol, or a novel.
What the fuck is an inverted globe? there is no relevance to this term in any astrophysics terminology.
We don't. We see the big dipper in a totally different position in summer vs. winter.
Because a compass is always attracted to the same relative position that being magnetic north. All maps are drawn pointing True north (top of the world) but because the magnetic north is always moving, navigation requires you to know what the magnetic declanation is. For example, ships on the Atlantic use a different offset than ships in the Pacifc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwIKx96q8lE&t=98s
So you can go in a circle around a globe, guided by the magnetic north, but not on a flat plain? Because Magnetic declination... And you can go around the North pole itself? But again you can't do this on a flat plain because of "Magnetic declination"? You can't grasp the concept that the stars should not be displayed on a flat map, while the Earth is a globe? You think flat is the opposite of round? You don't know the difference between Earth with a capital letter, and earth as the ground? You can picture standing on a globe, but not visualize the flat ground under your feet, while looking directly at a manufacture floor. That was the Question by the way. You state repeated information as facts without analysis of any kind, simply assuming you were told the truth and therefore provide that information as evidence and facts. You speak of the iron core of the Earth, yet can not fathom what the Black Sun could be. And again, there is no credible evidence that when you look at your own feet, that the small space you occupy is flat? Which ties back into your lack of an ability to understand terms such as flat and round are relative, and not opposite concepts.
K.
Yes
There is no such thing as a flat plane (referencing shape of the earth)
If you are at the equator, yes, you can fly around the earth constantly adjusting for magnetic declaration, yes. However, today, we use GPS in airplanes making it much easier.
There is no evidence of a flat plane. None.
Stars are in outer space. Why would they appear on a map of the earth?
Yes, it is.
Uh, yeah, I guess, what is it for you?
Grammer nazi?
The ground is not flat, over the span of thousands of miles, it eventually curves. What is "manufacture floor" - I have one in my kitchen, is that what you mean?
What?
I repeat known facts, that is true. What are you doing? Repeating baseless conspiraices?
I see the truth with my own eyes. I do not need to be convinced via Youtube which seems to be what happened to you.
I read, observe and make calculated decisions on empirical evidence. You do not do this, otherwise you would know the earth is a ball.
Correct. what is it? Have you seen it with your own eyes? Has any peer-review paper suggested this is true? has the scientific community supported such an idea? Molten iron, on the other hand, can be explained and is supported by thousands of scientists who believe the massive pressure and our magnetic van allen belts is keeping us alive from cosmic radiation is 100% plausible. While nothing is 100% since no one has ever seen the core, empirical evidence suggests it is true.
A 1x1 square can be flat. It can be perfectly flat because it only covers a small area. But if you take that 1x1 square, and expand it outwards a few thousand miles, gravity will pull it towards the center every time. If it were to remain perfectly flat over thousands of miles, you would need to elevate it. This is why suspension bridge towers are never 100% parallel. If you took an engineering course, you would learn that you need to compensate for the curvature of the earth. Go ask an engineer. They will confirm.
Semantics is a bitch.
I stopped reading as soon as I read this. I then stood up, walked around in a circle upon my flat floor and then sat back down. I can do this at the north pole as well. Do I need to tell you how irrelevant "Magnetic declination" is to where the compass will point while performing this feat? Well, in all fairness who knows, as you can never test it by passing over the antarctic without being shot out of the sky by an international alliance of military forces. Which is perfectly normal for a polar cap, without anything to hide, and nothing of value upon it.
Getting back on topic, I must say, you sir are not even smart enough to acknowledge the existence of the floor under your feet. Nobody can debate a person, so deprived of understanding that they do not understand basic concepts such as 'flat', or 'plain'.
I Sir salute you, as I am stun locked by your ineptitude. You Sir are truly a wonder to experience. Good day!