It seems like ever single week there's another meteoric rise and subsequent crash of a shiny, brand new rightwing mascot. Inevitably exposed as fraudulent or having their own personal views in opposition of how they've been represented. What's it going to take before you realize you've fallen for tribal, team sports where both you and the team you believe you're against lose every game and the umpires win?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
So you’re saying we should look to the financial, usery-based, rent seeking types? Hmmmmm sounding mighty “alt-right” there big guy
Now now, is that really what I said?
And the Far left and the Far Right have more in common than either faction would like to admit, certainly more than anyone with "neo" as a preferred political pronoun.
Well, an honest analysis of “who controls the gold” leaves one to wonder why an absurdly small group of oppressed desert wanderers controls such a large portion of the worlds wealth. Which itself ignores government, media, and intelligence operations. But that’s fine, let’s stick to finance. Who do you identify as the string pullers in finance? Who commands an utterly disproportional portion of world wealth?
I honestly don't think we know who these people are. It's easy to shout "Rothschild" and "Carnegie" and it's a possibility people like that truly are the top. But regarding the group of people you're eluding to, it does seem like there is a disproportionate amount of that group represented in the highest levels of influence. Be that government or entertainment. I don't think we can have a rational discussion about the how's and why's without being called a shill or tribesman though. Or at least if I represent possibilities from my point of view.
Ok you seem reasonable, so how can you fall into their trap of playing the game of us vs them? Your framing of the post here is hostile to an imagined “them” (boomer/low iq righties, who are clearly a minority voice here) and puts yourself in the elevated “us” of the geniuses who see past the deception. Except you yourself admit that a real and honest discussion cannot even occur, due to our channels of discourse being inundated with shills and sliders and well-poisoners (both literal and metaphorical). So don’t you think the first step is getting everyone on the same page, of Truth?
I just don’t think that happens by needless agression or divisiveness. Those things have their time and place, but the very start of the conversation is not it
Back on topic, those names are clearly above most others. If we’re ever going to find out who is above them, then it will only come from those we’ve identified, and after much consternation.