It seems like ever single week there's another meteoric rise and subsequent crash of a shiny, brand new rightwing mascot. Inevitably exposed as fraudulent or having their own personal views in opposition of how they've been represented. What's it going to take before you realize you've fallen for tribal, team sports where both you and the team you believe you're against lose every game and the umpires win?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Well, an honest analysis of “who controls the gold” leaves one to wonder why an absurdly small group of oppressed desert wanderers controls such a large portion of the worlds wealth. Which itself ignores government, media, and intelligence operations. But that’s fine, let’s stick to finance. Who do you identify as the string pullers in finance? Who commands an utterly disproportional portion of world wealth?
I honestly don't think we know who these people are. It's easy to shout "Rothschild" and "Carnegie" and it's a possibility people like that truly are the top. But regarding the group of people you're eluding to, it does seem like there is a disproportionate amount of that group represented in the highest levels of influence. Be that government or entertainment. I don't think we can have a rational discussion about the how's and why's without being called a shill or tribesman though. Or at least if I represent possibilities from my point of view.
Ok you seem reasonable, so how can you fall into their trap of playing the game of us vs them? Your framing of the post here is hostile to an imagined “them” (boomer/low iq righties, who are clearly a minority voice here) and puts yourself in the elevated “us” of the geniuses who see past the deception. Except you yourself admit that a real and honest discussion cannot even occur, due to our channels of discourse being inundated with shills and sliders and well-poisoners (both literal and metaphorical). So don’t you think the first step is getting everyone on the same page, of Truth?
I just don’t think that happens by needless agression or divisiveness. Those things have their time and place, but the very start of the conversation is not it
Back on topic, those names are clearly above most others. If we’re ever going to find out who is above them, then it will only come from those we’ve identified, and after much consternation.
There is absolutely zero "left" wing representation here. That's the entire point of this place. To isolate and insulate the American right. We can have a separate conversation about why that might be, but I'm only talking to "right" wingers and actual shills here. So I don't need to make a post critical of the left, literally every single other post does that. People here need to see something from a point of view that isn't their own ideas regurgitated. This post was genuine. Everyone here believes the left is being played. Nobody here thinks they are. There are people here who genuinely believe their neighbor is their sworn enemy because they voted differently. That's our common enemy at work. Turning us against each other at the lowest level. Most of these fraudulent charlatans reinforce the separation and further the divide.
Wow, you link to Robert Malone on joe rogan in order to bitch about trump supporters. Like cmon bruh. Biden is president right now. The left is just as much (actually more) to blame for the current dystopian take-over of mUhRoNa. Yet instead of actually rising above the fray, to see solutions over new horizons, you reeeeeee about an imagined enemy, which will obviously provoke people into making fun of you, which will only feed into your delusions of “muh rightoids”.
Be best.
Most people here have traditional values, but I disagree with the idea that anywhere near a majority of this sub are people who would vote for trump in 2024.
And you play into the false division by going on and on about perceived issues with trump supporters when most people here would argue against most of his actions (while probably supporting a relatively higher percent of his rhetoric, which makes sense, as every politician speaks with a forked tongue while working against the interests of the people who “elected” them).
It’s all a sham. You don’t get to say “it’s all a sham, but also I’m going to take the sham at face value in order to shit talk an imagined enemy”. That’s just unproductive (i.e. forum sliding or shilling in the extreme case). Your whole screed against this place is just uninformed, if not disinformed.