99
Comments (36)
sorted by:
9
6
deleted 6 points ago +8 / -2
4
KiloRomeo [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

So taking a minute to me skeptical here- yes you’re right in the sense that we could most accurately characterize this as: “we no longer need the EUA and you should make sure it can detect the flu”. Still though the way they word it implies to me that they’re aware the PCR FPs caused flu misdiagnosis.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
KiloRomeo [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

They’re pulling the EUA

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
captain-shitpost 0 points ago +1 / -1

your interpretation is incorrect.

they're pulling the EUA for demultiplexed PCR testing, and requiring multiplexed testing starting jan 1, 2022.

demultiplexed testing combines multiple inputs and if any is true, the output is true. so in a demuxed test, if you tested positive for the flu, or most common colds, the demuxed test is still positive. and with this pandemic, it was counted as covid. that's why the flu and cold numbers fell to damn near zero globally.

if they weren't doing this before, there would be no need for the announcement stating that all testing moving forward must be multiplexed, and that demuxed testing is banned. you could still just test "for covid" without testing for the flu... but nope, now that's banned.

1
ipproductions 1 point ago +1 / -0

so... what's the endgame? to bring back the retired flu and to convince people to vaccinate for the flu, which in semi-normie perception would be not as bad as covaks, and then inject the dumbdumbs with MRNA against flu?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
captain-shitpost 0 points ago +1 / -1

Where in the lab alert does it say that testing for just covid is banned?

you're not understanding. the original EUA is for demuxed tests. the EUA is being withdrawn, and the CDC is requiring multiplexed tests moving forward. it's what multiplexing means in this context. it's literally the definition.

"go and purchase private manufactured covid tests".

no, the issue was never about whether they were publicly or privately manufactured. it's whether they're multiplexed or not.

Also, do you have any evidence that the tests that were put out by the CDC and that are being discontinued came back positive if you had influenza but not covid?

again, it's literally the definition of multiplexing. what is being multiplexed? the input signal. if the new tests are required to be multiplexed, it's because the prior tests weren't. so what were they combining?

we already know practically anyone with any cold symptoms was being labeled as a covid death even without a positive test. look up any source for flu deaths in the 2020 winter or 2021 winter, and it's virtually zero. we didn't magically eradicate flu. we just started counting flu as covid.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
captain-shitpost 0 points ago +1 / -1

nope. that's literally what multiplexing is in context.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
TilValhallar 4 points ago +6 / -2

Countdown until COVID disappears:

Yeah, by Easter, like a miracle, remember?

Then right after the election, remember?

Then after the inauguration, remember?

2 more weeks!

6
krypt_o 6 points ago +6 / -0

Makes you wonder, if the PCR test, which is the only test they use as far as I'm aware, doesn't work...

How are they even testing for "covid" or its variants?

1
Blackbeans 1 point ago +1 / -0

They had a test that reacted to input. Put out a positive or negative sign. But it didn't really mean anything. Hence the "false positives, false negatives". Whole thing was bullshit.

3
Brokenmatrix2021 3 points ago +3 / -0

At this point if you believe any of this bullshit you need to be culled. Your deficient cuck DNA stops here.

1
UrTVisLying2U 1 point ago +1 / -0

Underrated comment

2
Thirsty_Liberty_Tree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bill Gates, George Soros and Global Access Health have entered the chat...

2
PoleWatcher 2 points ago +2 / -0

The takeaway... CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and ++++differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. ++++ That's why there was no flu last year, it was all labeled covid!

1
KiloRomeo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

💯

1
bootsy_two_scoops 1 point ago +1 / -0

Coincidentally, the flu just came back.

1
-Ontogenesis- 1 point ago +1 / -0

What are the chances that they developed or selected another test to give them the results they want for their agenda?

1
KiloRomeo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

This line made me lol.

CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.

It’s like they don’t want flu numbers to continue to be disappeared. Maybe this is causing too many sheeple to wake up

1
Skyrison 1 point ago +1 / -0

none of this matters anymore. it's not said to normie fucking morons that watch the brainwashing channels EVERY single fucking day and night. they dont even have to have a virus anymore. government have ULTIMATE power now to do w/e the fuck they want. we didnt fight back enough...

1
sharks_n_colorado 1 point ago +1 / -0

They told us this in July.

1
KiloRomeo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It goes live this week

1
PatriotsVsCommies 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait... this has been up since July 21?

1
KiloRomeo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes but it goes like this week so worth tracking

1
Mrexreturns 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why stealth change?

Just backpedal every testing procedure already.

Or just use the Smart Meter during a lockdown.

1
KiloRomeo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

In think they’re going to try to claim they “beat covid” at least for a period

2
Mrexreturns 2 points ago +3 / -1

There are orders from higher ups about when to stop and when to start.

And those higher ups are like: Banks, Globalist groups or Round Tables.

-2
TilValhallar -2 points ago +1 / -3

Why stealth change?

It's a public lab alert. How is that a "stealth change"?

-1
Mrexreturns -1 points ago +1 / -2

They could just say "abandon all PCR tests" -- but no. Because they will be replaced by Smart Meters.

-2
TilValhallar -2 points ago +1 / -3

you are not the target audience for the message so there is no need to dumb it down so that barely literate people can also understand it.