They wanted to do mRNA, yes, but when it comes to side effects, viral vector "vaccines" are just as bad. J&J, AstraZeneca and Sputnik use a different mechanism of action but achieve the same goal, i.e they all force your body cells to produce spike proteins, which are toxic themselves.
Both Sputnik and J&J are viral vector "vaccines" that cause your cells to produce spike protein. The same goes for AstraZeneca. Actually, there was a hilarious video on Odysee about this:
https://odysee.com/@OzFlor:7/Sputnik:f
Inactivated virus vaccines are different, they don't hijack body cells like a live virus would. The most damage they can do is produce a different immune response vs. what natural infection does, making you susceptible to an immune overreaction: https://conspiracies.win/p/140cSCy0UK/2012-paper-describes-lung-failur/
The other toxic chemicals they add to the vaccine ("adjuvants") can perhaps cause damage too, if they haven't been screened for long term damage. They're added for an "enhanced" immune response (obviously, since they are toxic).
Sure, adjuvants and ADE are still risk factors here, but this is the third category. It's not either mRNA or inactivated virus. There is a huge category of viral vector "vaccines", and they also work by turning bodies into spike protein factories, much like mRNA.
Yeah, from what I understand, viral vector vaccines eventually also (internally) produce the mRNA required for spike protein production, they just do it by rewriting cellular DNA as opposed to injecting externally produced mRNA.
The additional problem with mRNA vaccine is the lipid nanoparticles, which bypass protective mechanisms and get into every cell, something viruses can't do. Those cells manufacturing spikes have to be killed to save the body, even if they are heart, lymph node or brain cells (stuff which might not regrow). Viral vector vaccines, being viruses, won't do that - they're still bad because they dump spike proteins into the blood stream causing clots: https://www.ft.com/content/f76eb802-ec05-4461-9956-b250115d0577
Agree with the part about rapid vaccine development (COVID showed us pandemic propaganda can last maybe a year).
Another angle could be that they also wanted a suspicious vaccine to separate those who trust what they are told from those who don't ("compliant" vs. "resistors"). Now the resistors may be kicked out of jobs of importance (government, military, media, police etc.) with mandates, depending on Supreme Court.
Printing mRNA and packaging in nano-lipid has to be cheaper for the ((manufacturer)) than having to to clone up the protein in bacteria or cell cultures. Turn your own body into the toxic particle factory.
They wanted a "vaccine" that could be emailed and printed with Crispr.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/J6gWtcfgDRW8/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRISPR
They wanted to do mRNA, yes, but when it comes to side effects, viral vector "vaccines" are just as bad. J&J, AstraZeneca and Sputnik use a different mechanism of action but achieve the same goal, i.e they all force your body cells to produce spike proteins, which are toxic themselves.
Sure, but what would an example of a widely-used inactivated virus vaccine? One of the Chinese ones or Novovax?
Both Sputnik and J&J are viral vector "vaccines" that cause your cells to produce spike protein. The same goes for AstraZeneca. Actually, there was a hilarious video on Odysee about this: https://odysee.com/@OzFlor:7/Sputnik:f
Inactivated virus vaccines are different, they don't hijack body cells like a live virus would. The most damage they can do is produce a different immune response vs. what natural infection does, making you susceptible to an immune overreaction: https://conspiracies.win/p/140cSCy0UK/2012-paper-describes-lung-failur/
The other toxic chemicals they add to the vaccine ("adjuvants") can perhaps cause damage too, if they haven't been screened for long term damage. They're added for an "enhanced" immune response (obviously, since they are toxic).
Sure, adjuvants and ADE are still risk factors here, but this is the third category. It's not either mRNA or inactivated virus. There is a huge category of viral vector "vaccines", and they also work by turning bodies into spike protein factories, much like mRNA.
Yeah, from what I understand, viral vector vaccines eventually also (internally) produce the mRNA required for spike protein production, they just do it by rewriting cellular DNA as opposed to injecting externally produced mRNA.
The additional problem with mRNA vaccine is the lipid nanoparticles, which bypass protective mechanisms and get into every cell, something viruses can't do. Those cells manufacturing spikes have to be killed to save the body, even if they are heart, lymph node or brain cells (stuff which might not regrow). Viral vector vaccines, being viruses, won't do that - they're still bad because they dump spike proteins into the blood stream causing clots: https://www.ft.com/content/f76eb802-ec05-4461-9956-b250115d0577
Basically, natural immunity is the best by far.
Agree with the part about rapid vaccine development (COVID showed us pandemic propaganda can last maybe a year).
Another angle could be that they also wanted a suspicious vaccine to separate those who trust what they are told from those who don't ("compliant" vs. "resistors"). Now the resistors may be kicked out of jobs of importance (government, military, media, police etc.) with mandates, depending on Supreme Court.
Printing mRNA and packaging in nano-lipid has to be cheaper for the ((manufacturer)) than having to to clone up the protein in bacteria or cell cultures. Turn your own body into the toxic particle factory.