We even have WHO director claiming it’s a killshot that should only be given to 60-65+. I haven’t had a chance to compile any data yet. Figured I’d see if anyone else has seen such an analysis already.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
My hypothesis is that extremely healthy people have cells capable of creating an excessive amount of spikes when exposed to the mRNA gene modifications. They create more spikes + have higher cardiovascular load
They have better circulation, more active muscle use, the mRNA gets circulated faster.
Also cardio athletes express much more ACE-2 and spike protein antibodies have affinity to those receptors - > bigger risk after body has reacted to the spike in the injection.
Interesting hypothesis .. I have heart people theorize that the increased metabolism of these athletes spreads the nanoparticles containing the mRNA more widely through the body .. the million dollar question is whether non-athletes will suffer a similar fate, albeit delayed by some weeks, months or years?
That’s fair. If it were cellular stamina then we would see a strong age related confound. This seems to be true though could also be correlated with circularity ability