We even have WHO director claiming it’s a killshot that should only be given to 60-65+. I haven’t had a chance to compile any data yet. Figured I’d see if anyone else has seen such an analysis already.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
mortality already increased a lot worldwide
i'll take that into consideration, let's watch next year unfold...
Tell that to all the dead soccer players.
If A—>B—>C where C is deaths and A is jab, can we find a B where a population level increases has significantly occurred? My thought was incidence rate of myo/peri carditis
But the booster wasn’t approved until Fall. Have they updated this since?
I like you nigger. Glad to see you on here
It will never be instant death, that would be too obvious...
What's you're saying makes sense, but it seems that not everything goes according to their plans. Would you consider that the globalists screwed up royally, and jab deaths were not expected initially?
Mass sacrifice (herd thinning) events have been both prophesied and motivated by elites for a long time. This would be the most effective way outside of carpet bombing the entire planet with nukes. Especially if you intend to live on the surface yourself.
..which I still expect is going to happen when enough destabilization has occurred. Russia and China can sweep in and finish off the entire west soon.
We lack survival instincts and an incentive to survive at all. If you only live for yourself there's very little morals left.
I don't believe anything is random anymore, just varying variables.
There are many long-term risks: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/51