The great Barrington declaration is a joke. Literally any chucklefuck with internet access can sign it and claim to be a doctor. I just signed it right now as Dr Butt Snacks a PHD holder and medical practitioner from Missouri and it still went through lol. Don't believe me try it yourself on their website.
Who the company I work for? I make six figures as a controller for a mid size produce company. Dr butt snacks however makes zero dollars and is just doing it for the lulz. Seriously go sign it right now it takes like 30 seconds you will see what I mean
What is your user but a false identity? I'm just pointing out how easy it is to sign this thing that's all no need to get butt hurt about it. Unless you think it's not easy to sign? Again you can verify this yourself easily. The three doctors that authored the declaration are legit with good credentials but most of the other signatures are suspect because of the ease of signing and lack of vetting. It's good to be aware of the realities of things like this.
but a worthless fag from a loveless home could lie. I mean, what type of dirty jew fag lies about being a Medical practitioner, and then brags about it?!? Ever since the rabbi sucked your cock you've been worthless.
I will explain the point I was trying to make since you all predictably missed it. This GBR is easy to manipulate that means it can be manipulated by anyone for any reason. If you wanted to bolster your claims of herd immunity being widely accepted by the medical community for example wouldn't it be great if you could pad the stats and create thousands of signatures out of thin air from supposed MDs. Going the other way bad actors (like myself in the example) can file thousands of false signatures under obviously ridiculous names to discredit the GBR. My point is its a bad system they set up ripe for manipulation and therefore is suspect in either redirection whatever narrative you want to believe.
Nobody can alter the contents of the GBR, not even I.
I see what you are saying about fake identities. The fallacy here is called appeal to popularity. We can recognize this fallacy and assess the GBR for what it says rather than the number of people who support it.
Yeah this is the point I was trying to make and your position is very reasonable. To say it is a joke was perhaps a mistake on my part. More correct to say keep an open mind and understand that people want to manipulate us on multiple vectors. Checking sources and vetting information is important and often I see users on here believing things outright eith very sketchy proof or no proof at all. I agree with the majority of the user base on lockdowns being bad and I am anti mask/vaccine mandate. I personally took the vaccine but believe everyone should have that choice and anything else is government over reach. So it's funny I actually support the position of the GBR but due to the nature of the signatures am unsure how wide spread that belief is among medical practitioners of the west.
I get your point...but I don't think it was set up specifically to mis-direct people or to be used to destroy credible arguments...I don't think that was its intent. Of course this is my opinion...I could be wrong. If it was...well...that would be very nefarious to say the least...but with these monsters who knows?
They also say this about VAERS in the US and the Yellow Card system in the UK. Do you think those criticisms are valid? Do you find all online petitions to be invalid because people are able to create multiple email addresses?
I don't think it is a joke because one can read it and consider what it says. We do not rely upon the number of signatories to determine its validity.
It's not a joke - they should require people provide proof of their MD or medical status...but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Those who initially signed it are verifiable scientists who are credible.
The great Barrington declaration is a joke. Literally any chucklefuck with internet access can sign it and claim to be a doctor. I just signed it right now as Dr Butt Snacks a PHD holder and medical practitioner from Missouri and it still went through lol. Don't believe me try it yourself on their website.
Who the company I work for? I make six figures as a controller for a mid size produce company. Dr butt snacks however makes zero dollars and is just doing it for the lulz. Seriously go sign it right now it takes like 30 seconds you will see what I mean
What is your user but a false identity? I'm just pointing out how easy it is to sign this thing that's all no need to get butt hurt about it. Unless you think it's not easy to sign? Again you can verify this yourself easily. The three doctors that authored the declaration are legit with good credentials but most of the other signatures are suspect because of the ease of signing and lack of vetting. It's good to be aware of the realities of things like this.
You make jack
You are a piece of shit with no human integrity.
Human beings respond truthfully when asked:
but a worthless fag from a loveless home could lie. I mean, what type of dirty jew fag lies about being a Medical practitioner, and then brags about it?!? Ever since the rabbi sucked your cock you've been worthless.
Lol
What makes it a joke besides the fact that some serious scientists didn't foresee unscrupulous pedophiles like yourself might fraudulently sign it?
Again, take your booster, keep your hands off children, and die screaming, bleeding from every orifice.
I will explain the point I was trying to make since you all predictably missed it. This GBR is easy to manipulate that means it can be manipulated by anyone for any reason. If you wanted to bolster your claims of herd immunity being widely accepted by the medical community for example wouldn't it be great if you could pad the stats and create thousands of signatures out of thin air from supposed MDs. Going the other way bad actors (like myself in the example) can file thousands of false signatures under obviously ridiculous names to discredit the GBR. My point is its a bad system they set up ripe for manipulation and therefore is suspect in either redirection whatever narrative you want to believe.
Nobody can alter the contents of the GBR, not even I.
I see what you are saying about fake identities. The fallacy here is called appeal to popularity. We can recognize this fallacy and assess the GBR for what it says rather than the number of people who support it.
Appeal to Popularity Fallacy: Definition & Examples https://study.com/academy/lesson/appeal-to-popularity-fallacy-definition-examples.html
Yeah this is the point I was trying to make and your position is very reasonable. To say it is a joke was perhaps a mistake on my part. More correct to say keep an open mind and understand that people want to manipulate us on multiple vectors. Checking sources and vetting information is important and often I see users on here believing things outright eith very sketchy proof or no proof at all. I agree with the majority of the user base on lockdowns being bad and I am anti mask/vaccine mandate. I personally took the vaccine but believe everyone should have that choice and anything else is government over reach. So it's funny I actually support the position of the GBR but due to the nature of the signatures am unsure how wide spread that belief is among medical practitioners of the west.
Herd immunity is accepted by the medical community, stupid fag.
Now that experts have gathered a huge amount of support and < horror !> publicity for good, as opposed to evil, now its only about a "narrative"
Fuck off back to your kibbutz, fag jew.
I get your point...but I don't think it was set up specifically to mis-direct people or to be used to destroy credible arguments...I don't think that was its intent. Of course this is my opinion...I could be wrong. If it was...well...that would be very nefarious to say the least...but with these monsters who knows?
Yep everyone that disagrees with you is a pedophile. Totally not unhinged at all. Have a nice day dude.
They also say this about VAERS in the US and the Yellow Card system in the UK. Do you think those criticisms are valid? Do you find all online petitions to be invalid because people are able to create multiple email addresses?
I don't think it is a joke because one can read it and consider what it says. We do not rely upon the number of signatories to determine its validity.
It's not a joke - they should require people provide proof of their MD or medical status...but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Those who initially signed it are verifiable scientists who are credible.